DEATH TO THE BANKERS!

 

by Banjo_Billy

There are all kinds of political slogans. All of them are designed to put a message into the empty noggins of as many people as possible. And when the message is received and the People become enlightened, then action is taken and political change occurs. Small wonder that the Enemies of Mankind always try to monopolize the Media so that these slogans are muffled and their own slogans and messages go out to deceive the world and to betray the People.

In modern times, these Deceivers have promoted their own slogans such as “Free Trade” or “Normal Business Cycle” or “We are all Immigrants” in order to put false ideas into the empty noggins of the people who trust them and believe their words.

For example, in 1914, the bankers promised that if we gave them the authority to loan us back our own money at interest, that they would make sure that there would never be any bank failures or inflations or depressions. After all, they assured us, politicians cannot be trusted with printing money but only bankers who understand how to filch the smallest farthing should have such power. And so, the empty noggins on Capital Hill believed that the world’s greediest and most ruthless people could be entrusted with our wealth and gave to the bankers the Federal Reserve Banking Swindle, the world’s biggest cash cow, for their very own.

It took only fifteen years for the bankers to get all of the kinks ironed out and the Federal Reserve Banking System working smoothly. Then, once they were confident that all was in place, they and their relatives on Wall Street engineered the Stock Market Crash of 1929 and the Great Depression. During the Great Depression, as millions of people starved and were thrown into poverty, the bankers grew fat and were able to buy cheap factories and businesses so that their extended families could also make a lot of money once they had brought them all over as “oppressed immigrants” from Eastern Europe. Once the factories were safely in the hands of their relatives, the bankers put those factories to work making their relatives rich with war material for World War Two.

After all, nothing makes money for a banker better than a war. Unless, of course, it’s two wars, or three or more than three. Korea, Vietnam, and the present, unending war against the enemies of Israel do nothing but makes money. Yes, wars kill and maim millions of people and cause unimaginable suffering, but they are really wonderful money-makers for the bankers and their relatives in manufacturing and retail. Oy, such profits, you wouldn’t believe!

Smedley Butler wrote "War is a Racket."

Such wars were never designed to be won and an end put to the alleged “causes” for such wars because wars that are never won must forever be fought. And unending wars create unending profits for those greedy and ruthless monsters on Wall Street and the bloated creatures counting their profits in the banks.

Presently, the bankers have been able to blackmail and bribe the treasonous Congressmen into allowing them to rape and pillage the People and to destroy our country. After all, when the People realize that we are being defrauded, we tend to become agitated towards those who defraud us. So, to make sure that the bankers are safe, the bribed politicians promote the immigration of foreigners to dispossess us of our country just as the bankers have dispossessed us of our wealth. After the bankers have shipped our manufacturing overseas at great profit to themselves, and after they have foreclosed our homes since we no longer have jobs to pay the mortgage, the next step is to sell the foreclosed homes to the foreigners whom the bankers have made wealthy by giving them our jobs.

But these schemes become unraveled because the huge amounts of money that the bankers claim exist in the country, in fact, are merely delusions of a banker’s account ledger. If you charge fifty percent interest on a dollar, that makes a dollar fifty. Even though the dollar exists, the interest does not exist. It is nothing but a banker’s creation through accounting trickery. The same is true with the trillions of dollars allegedly in circulation today. Most of this money does not, in fact, exist because it is only an entry in an account book but not real money.

And so, how can a banker sell the empty houses that he has swindled from the People if there is not enough money to buy them? The People can’t buy them because we have no jobs. Our jobs were sent off to India and China and Mexico and every other place where the bankers and their relatives could profit from cheap labor. And so, our houses are sold to the fully-employed foreigners and immigrants who can afford to buy them, at interest, from the bankers because the bankers gave them our jobs.

But even so, the account books claim that the country owes the bankers a lot more money than really exists because interest-on-a-loan always creates the impression that more money is owed than was borrowed. And when that interest is compounded, the mere numbers exponentially make the false claim that everything in the world is owed to the bankers and that we are in debt to them. Like a magic-wand that gives its possessor the whole world, interest-on-a-loan gives the bankers (in theory and on paper) all of our wealth for free. And for the bankers to get our wealth, all we have to do is agree that his swindles are honest and that we are in his debt.

So, what is a poor, starving banker to do when he “owns” more houses than he can sell to foreigners? What is he to do as these homes are quickly being destroyed as the dispossessed, homeless and starving street people squat in them and tear them apart? The quick solution to this emergency of the bankers not having enough money, is to have the tax payers whom the banker has betrayed, buy them.

And so you see, our present “credit crises” can very easily be solved by giving our tax money to the bankers so that they can fill their vaults with the real dollars that their ledger books say should actually be there. Make no mistake; this is not “creative book keeping” at all. This is out-and-out larceny. The Congress-critters know it but their own mortgages are owned by the bankers so they are all in favor of offering us up to Molach to save themselves.

Those grinning, smiling politicans know that they are going to give the bankers and the Wall Street swindlers 700 billion of our dollars just so that these rich thieves can continue to fly their Leer jets and vacation in their Swiss chalets and Riviera resorts. But to make us all agree to the swindle and to not vote the politicians out for treason or to shoot them, they are pretending to wring their hands and beat their breasts over “how” to give the bankers our money. The question is not “should” they betray us to the swindling bankers and Wall Street vampires but “how” can they betray us. And once our money is given to those vultures, we are assured that it will be “business as usual” and that the “crises has passed” and that a “new business cycle” will begin as the bankers continue to defraud us of our property, betray us to our enemies and dispossess us of our lands.

Do the bankers sit by and let the politicians decide their fate? Do they let the wheels of politics and democracy turn with solid verity? Of course not! They are bankers and thieves. They are not about to let a politician decide the fate of the People when they can add a bit of blackmail to the mix. And so, to make sure that the politicians hurry up and give them 700 billion dollars with no strings attached, the bankers make their great threat. They play their ace-in-the-hole. They up the ante and tell you they aren’t bluffing.

Remember when the bankers promised that there would never be a depression if we gave them the power to loan us back our own money at interest? Remember that almost as soon as they got the Federal Reserve Banking Act approved, they threw us into the Great Depression? So, are the bankers today nicer than the ones who controlled the FED in 1929? No, because this time they are threatening the politicans with this ace-in-the-hole: “Give us 700 billion dollars for free or we will cause another Great Depression.”

And so, we are back at full circle with our money teetering on the brink of total loss on one side and another Great Depression on the other side. Only this time, there is one difference that the bankers did not foresee. In 1929, they enjoyed the fruits of their swindles with their Rolls-Royces, mansions, Charleston-dancing flappers, bootleg liquor, European vacations and Cuban cigars. But now in 2008, there is a slogan than will stop them just like a steel trap stops a rat:

DEATH TO THE BANKERS

Grafitti this on the walls of every bank. Slap this on bumper stickers on every car. Tattoo this on the forehead of every politician you can tie-up and torture. Brand this in fear over the heart of every banker in the land. A slogan is just some empty words that put ideas into the minds of empty noggins. But once a few empty noggins are filled with illuminating light, actions occur and the world is changed. It doesn’t take much to make the world a better place. Anyone can do it. It may be a long road that a banker walks on his way to the scaffold, but every road starts with just one step. And you, yes YOU! You can help a banker on his way. Start with just one slogan spray-painted today.

Original here

                  

INCOG MAN NOTE:

To the few of you White “conservatives,” “moderates” and “liberals” out there, or even you militant Blacks and sensitive Gays who have read this far: You need to put aside all the bullshit about yourselves and get on the stick. I’m as serious as I can be now.

Yeah, I know I’m a son of a bitch towards you all the time, but I’d never be like what these corrupt slime really and truly are, what they have done to us and are planning. Everything about your lives will mean nothing when they finally turn this whole country into the New World Order shithole they’ve always wanted and have been gradually working towards.

They’ve used you to divide up the one possible threat to their evil machinations: An awakened White population in solidarity. You know this to be true deep down, but just will not face it because of your personal, selfish world view. When will you ever get it?

You liberal Whites need to seriously reevaluate the whole deal: You’ve been used by the very people you always fought against; just by feeding you what you wanted to hear — clever trick, wasn’t it? If you really think about it, you’ll see that’s exactly the deal and always has been.

You conservative Whites need to figure out that all the “Islamo-Facism” and the necessary “Globalism” crap you’re been fed 24/7 is just that: Total bullshit. How much more manure will you ingest before you finally put two and two together about these traitors?

This is NOT about some image we have of ourselves or a lifestyle that we wish to project. It’s about the country of the United States and whether or not we will continue on the course we have obviously been put on by these people. We need to put a stop to these game-playing, manipulative scam artists and soon!

We’re in a real war, people — us poor American slobs, the Goyim, versus the octopus of centralized International Jew Banking and his many arrogant Jewish supremacist foot soldiers doing everything they can to snow-job you and keep you confused and in the dark about the real deal.

Oh, I know you Jews won’t like any of this kind of talk, whatsover. Figuring that out proved everything to me. Even daring to broach anything about this will make them curse you with all kinds of names they keep at the ready for an awakened Goyim, especially White Goyim. But multitudes of Whites have thrown aside any critical thinking and have been totally brainwashed by them into acting as enforcers of PC on their behalf — insulating the real “man” from public scrutiny.

But it’s all coming to an end folks, regardless. The Jew’s big mouth, once again, gives them away and people of all kinds are now waking up to the financial, political and social morass they’ve created in this country. You Jews need to think about a one-way ticket to Tel Aviv, since your days as a parasite in America are coming to an end — a fast approaching end, no less.

— Phillip Marlowe

Go here for a good run-down on the situation: Bailout Bedlam: Robbing the Taxpayer to save the Banks and watch the following video.

700 Billion is nothing

Watch this short, 7 minute video from Democracy Now! describing the current situation. Also, talks about the “Derivatives” issue on the horizon and the missing trillions from the Pentagon that I talked about in my blog post on the Super Zionist Dov Zakheim (in my 9/11 section). Also, go to my Videos I page above you and watch the video “The Money Masters” to understand the fiat money system and the background as briefly mentioned in the above video.

                       

NOTE! All the Jewish Supremacists and Zionists spoken about here are mostly from the Khazar tribe originating from southern Russia (also called the Ashkenazi), who converted in the 8th-9th century, AD. Not the true Israelites of the Bible nor the Torah Jews (Neturei Karta). These KHAZAR interlopers donned the cloak of Judaism, yet retained ancient criminal and parasitic functions among host nations. Over the centuries, their behavior has caused the Gentile populations to rise up and throw them bodily out or worse. This has happened about 79 times. Now, Zionistic elements of them have control of important and powerful parts of America and other White, European nations, as well as having their own stolen country in the Mideast that we’re now completely beholden to — no matter what they do to us or what they make us do to the world for them. According to their Talmud, we are nothing but “Goyim” or cattle to them.

Print Friendly

About INCOG MAN

100% White boy born and bred in the USA. Dedicated to awakening Whites to all the crap being done to our decent, fair-minded race and exposing the devious brainwashing rats behind it all. Wake the ef up, White people!
This entry was posted in Economy, Jew Crime and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

50 Responses to DEATH TO THE BANKERS!

  1. Victates says:

    Incog,

    Why do you persist in the whole Ashkenazi equals Khazaria thesis? Let alone calling NK ‘Torah jews’ dividing them from the rest of the Ashkenazi, which by the way they generally are.

    I have responded to your two articles, well not yours but rather the writings of other people that you have posted here, as my friend Lionaxe asked:

    Preliminary comments: http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot.com/2008/09/some-brief-comments-to-incogman.html

    Response to the exerpts you posted from Gilad Atzmon’s article: http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot.com/2008/09/response-to-incogman-part-i.html

    Response to the article you posted from ‘CelticSicilian’ ‘proving’ that the one equates the other: http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot.com/2008/10/response-to-incogman-part-ii.html

    Balls in your court: either respond in a reasonable time frame or concede. Oh and please don’t plead lack of time: if you can’t back up your claism then you shouldn’t post it.

    As an aside please riddle me this: if NK are ‘Torah jews’ then what pray are you doing saying you are against jews? You don’t appear to be against them at all: all you seem to be against is Zionism. Which by-the-way you should in theory, although not in practice due to current real politick, be all for. Also your claiming that the Ashkenazi are not the same as the NK can only mean you are judging them by religion and not by race. Which I dare say means you can’t be a Racialist now can you old chap?

    Also the Zionist conspiracy thing is overly simplistic it doesn’t understand jewry as jewry is. I’d suggest looking at their history and having a think about it: you might be able to comprehend that jews look for the best solution and often radically disagree about it. That is how you should be looking to understand their behaviour since it isn’t all pro-Israel, but that rather is simply a trend within jewry at the moment, much like adherance to socialism and communism was as well as secular assimilation was in the 19th century.

    Oh and I do believe Lionaxe has debunked the supposed Talmudic quote about goyim equals cattle. You’d do better to focus on the actual connotation of goy in both Yiddish and Hebrew writings as well as terms like Shiksa rather than the imaginary stuff. If you want to read a fairly decent critique of the Talmud I’d suggest sitting down and reading an English translation of Eisenmenger’s ‘Entdecktes Judenthum’. Since it actually has the Hebrew facsmilies for a start.

    If you want to fight the jews Incog that’s fine by me, but if you really want to fight them rather than help them then you will have to start with getting the basics right rather than spouting off stuff that most people with an IQ over 120 can debunk with a little checking.

  2. incogman says:

    Your comment was in my moderation que due to number of links, only. I will read it more closely later. I know you will be sarcastic about that, but right now I’m involved in the bailout biz.

    We’ll discuss ancient history later.

  3. Victates says:

    Well then if I may politely suggest if you want to focus on the bailout issue that you stop adding addenda claiming things I already know you are unable to back up. The whole point of propaganda is to spread defensible truth in an easy to digest format not a portion of truth with a varying portion of what is politely called misinformation. The latter is the essence of the ‘Big Lie’ technique used by jews to great effect and what these days ‘WN’s’ such as yourself seem to copy. The former is the honest and Aryan approach: we correct ourselves when we are shown we are incorrect.

    You have a choice to make: either stop posting huey about ‘real Israelites’ and Talmudic quotes when you patently, I am being nice here because I am pretty sure you have not (from what I’ve read and remember about you on SF), haven’t looked into either issue or even for a critical perspective (jewish or otherwise: if you want a jewish critique of Pranitias then I suggest Rabbi Louis Ginzberg’s responsa published by the Jewish Publication Society of America) or post what you can defend (and be prepared to defend it). Take some responsibility please: your excuse is almost verbatim that given to me by some Rabbis (as Lionaxe can attest since he got the same excuses) after being given a touch of a bloody nose. Either you defend what you write or concede: if you want two weeks or so that doesn’t bother me, but as I said I expect a response of some kind.

    Actually I am not surprised about the moderation queue, but then why would I be sarcastic about it? I am polemical, sarcastic and irritable but I don’t remember making a comment about your moderation.

    Oh btw if you want to post the ‘MoneyMasters’ vid. then I’d suggest reading (Professor) Carol Quigley’s work first. Since a lot of what is in the vid. is basically verbatim Quigley.

  4. incogman says:

    Well, well. Victates makes an appearance here at INCOG LAND. Welcome. LionAxe speaks highly of you (at least in his signature line). I spotted LionAxe’s comments here under a name Cornelius Something-Berg, by his style of writing. You, I don’t know, but suspect I will soon enough.

    Incog,

    Why do you persist in the whole Ashkenazi equals Khazaria thesis? Let alone calling NK ‘Torah jews’ dividing them from the rest of the Ashkenazi, which by the way they generally are.

    I have responded to your two articles, well not yours but rather the writings of other people that you have posted here, as my friend Lionaxe asked:

    Preliminary comments: http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot.com/2008/09/some-brief-comments-to-incogman.html

    Response to the exerpts you posted from Gilad Atzmon’s article: http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot.com/2008/09/response-to-incogman-part-i.html

    Response to the article you posted from ‘CelticSicilian’ ‘proving’ that the one equates the other: http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot.com/2008/10/response-to-incogman-part-ii.html

    Balls in your court: either respond in a reasonable time frame or concede. Oh and please don’t plead lack of time: if you can’t back up your claism then you shouldn’t post it.

    Excuse me! I had know idea you were responding to me way off somewhere else on the WWW. My omnescience is failing me.

    As an aside please riddle me this: if NK are ‘Torah jews’ then what pray are you doing saying you are against jews? You don’t appear to be against them at all: all you seem to be against is Zionism. Which by-the-way you should in theory, although not in practice due to current real politick, be all for. Also your claiming that the Ashkenazi are not the same as the NK can only mean you are judging them by religion and not by race. Which I dare say means you can’t be a Racialist now can you old chap?

    Who said anything about me being a blindless hater? Is it not reasonable that for me to say anything requires a modicum of brevity instead of having to trot out a maelstrom of “except for…” for everything?

    You and me both know that’s the case and why so many bundle off the whole Jewish race.

    And it’s not simply “Zionism” either. That’s like saying all republicans or democrats suck.

    Also the Zionist conspiracy thing is overly simplistic it doesn’t understand jewry as jewry is. I’d suggest looking at their history and having a think about it: you might be able to comprehend that jews look for the best solution and often radically disagree about it. That is how you should be looking to understand their behaviour since it isn’t all pro-Israel, but that rather is simply a trend within jewry at the moment, much like adherance to socialism and communism was as well as secular assimilation was in the 19th century.

    Israel is the overall term for the Jewish race and it’s not limited to a mere geographical location. It’s the cohesiveness of Jewry in their overall efforts to advance themselves at the expense of the White race in their own nations that is the problem.

    Oh and I do believe Lionaxe has debunked the supposed Talmudic quote about goyim equals cattle. You’d do better to focus on the actual connotation of goy in both Yiddish and Hebrew writings as well as terms like Shiksa rather than the imaginary stuff. If you want to read a fairly decent critique of the Talmud I’d suggest sitting down and reading an English translation of Eisenmenger’s ‘Entdecktes Judenthum’. Since it actually has the Hebrew facsmilies for a start.

    You refer to a debunking somewhere else. I have read many Jews themselves describing it exactly so. Plus, they have other terms like “Cuthanite” “Heathen” “Amalek” to delineate us versus them. What you are really trying to say is that Jewry, thru-out history, has always kindly termed us. That is is way too bogus for belief.

    I’ll look into the book you suggest. But it may be awhile. I rely on Christian theologians of the past who have read the actual Talmud and Kaballah in Hebrew and what they have to say. But I claim no expert opinion, yet I do check several opposition Jew sites like Daamet and something on Geocities and see how they spin it.

    I have found bullshit on both sides of the fence, I will admit. But it’s quite evident that the Talmud can be every bit as hateful towards us Goyim as much as they say about Christian or Nazi talk about them.

    If you want to fight the jews Incog that’s fine by me, but if you really want to fight them rather than help them then you will have to start with getting the basics right rather than spouting off stuff that most people with an IQ over 120 can debunk with a little checking.

    I have yet to see LionAxe put to bed everything like you come here and try to say. He is good and have much respect for what he writes (but do not follow all his writing). But he has not swayed me on some crucial subjects (specifically, 9/11 technical things).

    I’ll go to your above links and read them at my leisure. That and the DNA study PDF of LionAxe’s. I hardly think that a few days will make much diff after 1700 years.

    Let me ask you something: What’s the real motive driving you and LionAxe? Be honest with me and your God.

    Mine, is seeing that the United States of America is not turned into a shithole by these people. I sincerely do hope you can understand something as mundane and current events orientated as that.

  5. incogman says:

    I’ll tell you what: Why don’t you write out my “disclaimer” paragraph like the one I’ve got in the above post?

    I’ll give it close attention and if it’s fair and honest, I’ll use that.

    Also, how about cutting down the copy as much as possible? The above article should be what we discuss. It’s a anal thing with me, you understand, plus the other ‘haters’ can take part.

  6. Victates says:

    Incog writes:

    ‘Well, well. Victates makes an appearance here at INCOG LAND. Welcome. LionAxe speaks highly of you (at least in his signature line). I spotted LionAxe’s comments here under a name Cornelius Something-Berg, by his style of writing. You, I don’t know, but suspect I will soon enough.’

    He does. That’s because we’ve been good friends ever since we clashed on Stormfront OV and we learnt from each other. I merely use my old moniker so you know who I am, since I was and still am pretty well known. Its hardly like Lionaxe was hiding his identity either.

    Incog writes:

    ‘Excuse me! I had know idea you were responding to me way off somewhere else on the http://WWW. My omnescience is failing me.’

    Well you were told that a response would be forthcoming openly on SF and were told you had been linked to it. I was giving you the link to enable you to reply if you are able.

    As your omniscience is failing then perhaps you pray should learn to do a little reading and checking before relying on it? See I can do biting sarcasm too.

    ‘Who said anything about me being a blindless hater? Is it not reasonable that for me to say anything requires a modicum of brevity instead of having to trot out a maelstrom of “except for…” for everything?’

    A ‘blindless hater’… heh. You’ll have to qualify that remark since it doesn’t bear any particular relevance to what I stated to you. I approach jews as a race, because I am a Racialist. As for brevity yes it is necessary to be en pointe, but it also necessary to clarify yourself where it is pointed out you are not being clear. You see you are taking a journalistic approach where generalisations don’t particularly matter, where-as I take a far more academic approach on the issue. Which means I can be pedantic as hell: although I try not to be in my responsa.

    It is also useful to post a clarification on an issue and then simply link back to it.

    ‘You and me both know that’s the case and why so many bundle off the whole Jewish race.’

    Why so many what? Gentiles? Christians? Renegade jews?

    And it’s not simply “Zionism” either. That’s like saying all republicans or democrats suck.’

    It is simply Zionism because as far as I can see you’ve made little distinction between the various kinds of it. The only distinction you’ve made is between the limited opposition to secular Zionism in the form of NK who oppose it for religious reasons but are opposed again by religious Zionists in Israel (the most extreme wing being the Kach lot). You also seem to treat them as being ‘Torah jews’, but then that in itself is wrong because the Torah jews quite literally would be the Karites.

    I also didn’t say ‘all Zionists suck’, but that’s basically what you’ve been doing for the last age both on SF and here. But then I suppose it does depend on what you mean by ‘Zionist’ since the term is so bandied about it has multiple meanings. The one you are using seems to be the colloquial version as used by people like Alan Hart (Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews [etc ad nauseum]).

    ‘Israel is the overall term for the Jewish race and it’s not limited to a mere geographical location. It’s the cohesiveness of Jewry in their overall efforts to advance themselves at the expense of the White race in their own nations that is the problem.’

    Yes, it is but the use of Israel to equate jews writ large is only used by the religious generally-speaking. If you are going to play with word definitions then it is a good idea to make clear, which meaning you are using. Israel in the common parlance said without qualification does mean Israel the nation state.

    However assuming that jewry is cohesive in advancing itself is not exactly true either, because jews although they fundamentally have the same biological objective i.e. what is best for them as a group and/or as an individual (cf. Benjamin Freedman for one example of the latter over riding the former). Differ radically in their approach to what is best for them as a race and how they are going to get there. If you treat them as one big hive if you like then you will never understand them and you leave yourself open to their standardized rebuttals, (but what about..?).

    They don’t even agree on how to fight anti-Semitism, but rather some in a typically Freudian manner go right on ahead and join the anti-Semitic crowd often by claiming to be an ‘insider’ on this, that or the other matter. Jews are far more complicated than McDonald thinks and although his ideas have a lot of merit; they are altogether a little too general and lack the essentially Freudian angle of jews.

    Think of the jews as a race as a series of gangs, some large and some miniscule, fighting over the same resources and territory with shifting alliances and wars etc. Then you will get a little closer to the truth of the matter in my opinion, which is based on a lot of reading, a lot of observation and pretending to be one of them on occasion (not that hard).

    As to the expense of the ‘White race’: it isn’t the ‘White race’ they are fighting (and anyway there is no such thing: there is a Caucasoid race and there are the two sub-races, which make up Aryan but there is no ‘White race’ its a colloquial not a term of racial taxomony). The jews are not fighting anything in particular other than each other for territory. You see when the jews begin to run away from you then you know they are worried, but as far as I am aware the jews consider ‘WN’ to be a joke. Just an observation I’ve read more than a few times.

    ‘You refer to a debunking somewhere else. I have read many Jews themselves describing it exactly so. Plus, they have other terms like “Cuthanite” “Heathen” to delineate us versus them. What you are really trying to say is that Jewry, thru-out history, has always kindly termed us. That is is way too bogus for belief.’

    I refer to some pretty prominent SF threads as well as quite a lot of general literature, in which this particular quote Baba Mezia 114b or something if memory serves has been debunked. The problem being that it doesn’t actually appear.

    They have indeed deliniated between Gentile and Jew, further sub-dividing both as it happens in various forms. I didn’t say otherwise and in fact said quite the opposite if you’d actually read what I wrote. Oh and please don’t ascribe things or even thoughts to me I haven’t had let alone stated. You noticed I said that you would do well to focus on the use of ‘goy’ and ‘shiksa’ in Yiddish and Hebrew literature, as well as its colloquial use of jewish mailings lists, fora and in real-life discussion, well what do you think that was me doing?

    Please don’t make up arguments and then attribute them to me: its not a good idea.

    One example you might want to look up is ‘goyische’ in terms of Yiddish slang and I do believe Debbie Schussel, famous ‘neo-con’ jewess if you don’t know her, said something about the entire goy/goyim thing recently (i.e. that it was oft used as a perjorative term by jews). Might be handy as a point of reference.

    ‘I’ll look into the book you suggest. But it may be awhile. I rely on Christian theologians of the past who have read the actual Talmud and Kaballah in Hebrew and what they have to say. But I claim no expert opinion, yet I do check several opposition Jew sites like Daamet and something on Geocities and see how they spin it.’

    Yep, well Eisenmenger is the original, and probably still one of the best, Christian critics of Judaism. You’d also do well to read the Christian Talmudic scholars like George Foot Moore as well for additonal perspective. Since you see Hoffmann, Dilling and others are not scholars of Judaism and their arguments are largely reinterating Eisenmenger a tradition that started with August Roehling and his 1871 ‘Der Talmudjude’ I do believe. The latter introducing a lot of the really bad quotations that you will get massacred on.

    As for the scholars who have attacked Judaism then you would do well to read up on the history of what James Parkes called ‘the conflict between Church and synagogue’ i.e. the Talmudic controversy in particular. You should also note that the entire thing started because of jewish converts to Christianity: Nicholas Donin to be precise. You see Christian attacks on the Talmud have always been predicated on the basis of anti-Christian content, which while true in some cases and not in others, are never-the-less often short sighted in that they ignore the structure of the Talmud, which is very important in critiquing it. It is not the Bible it is a collection of responsa: one does not cite one passage unless one clarifies it with the rulings on that subject which appear throughout the Talmud and most importantly with actual jewish practice.

    If you want to quote the Talmud with any authority then it is common practice to have at least looked into what authorities you cite. Any Yeshiva student worth his salt and with enough leisure could take apart Dilling or Hoffmann et al. You have to approach such debates carefully, because the arguments used are necessarily precise in nature.

    The Talmud can be critiqued and Lionaxe has come up with some innovative and may I say brilliant arguments against it which he has tested on Rabbinical authorities and basically won on. That is how you critique something, but if you can’t do that then you should at least check your authorities.

    As for Daatmet again its similar to your use of Sand (i.e. you need to apply your racial standard coherently across jews because its a biological not a social perspective) and again Lionaxe has made some comments about the use of that site on Stormfront. I believe he made them to you; but I might be wrong. You see when people say jews love to lie it is very important to recognise that Laborite jews do so just as much as Likudnik jews if you take my point.

    ‘I have yet to see LionAxe put to bed everything like you come here and try to say. He is good and have much respect for what he writes (but do not follow all his writing). But he has not swayed me on some crucial subjects (specifically, 9/11 technical things).

    I’ll go to your above links and read them at my leisure. That and the DNA study PDF of LionAxe’s. I hardly think that a few days will make much diff after 1700 years.’

    Hmmm: he has put to bed a great many things but I never said he put to bed everything if he had done so then he would be God and that would be blasphemy: no?

    If he has not swayed you then you should be able to counter his arguments as I recall you had your arse, like many a troofer has, on the claims made related to 9/11. I also have never seen a troofer win in an argument on Randi.org, although many have tried. You see I am all to well aware, being of a skeptical intellectual background, that those who believe in what are generally, although often mistakening IMO, called ‘conspiracy theories’ if they can’t win in an argument because their opponent knows far more than they do often say ‘they are not convinced’. However people will believe in what they want to believe in including ghosts, bigfoot and blood-sucking reptiles in human form.

    You can respond to both us at your leisure: I just prefer to know that you will respond rather than have some lame excuse about ‘not having time’.

    ‘Let me ask you something: What’s the real motive driving you and LionAxe? Be honest with me and your God.’

    Real motive… well our weltanschauung, National Socialism, would be the motive. We are both NS in the real meaning of the term not ‘Sieg Heil! At one’s television’ ‘nazis’ (or should be say that is what jews think a National Socialist is and the neos just believed their television screens). NS is an elite ideology, its a way of thinking and living (NS know NS: call it a feeling in one’s blood) , and we have extremely high standards and that part of that means we have to responsibility for things. Myself and Lionaxe are specialists in the jewish question (myself in jewish history and Lionaxe in jewish theology) and hence we are intellectually revamping anti-Semitism to make en-pointe, accurate and intellectually appealing.

    That means taking out and discrediting the idiots, such as Duke, one by one. Oliver and Pierce have a lot more going for them intellectually but are unfortunately little read and even less understood.

    As for the snide reference to ‘my God’ inferring that myself and Lionaxe are jewish, I am sorry to disappoint you but he is an agnostic and I am a Roman Catholic.

    You seem to be presuming both of us are ‘antis’, as the parlance goes, actually its the other side. I’ve been through nearly everything ‘WN’ has to offer in terms of literature and found it to be extremely wanting (low on substance, high on meaningless rhetoric).

    You see the US is already in deep trouble, but I’ve met few ‘WNs’ who actually care about their supposed race, but rather treat it as an abstract like Marxists treat the ‘proletariat’/’proletarians’. Actions speak louder than words.

    As for writing your ‘disclaimer paragraph’: no why should I? Its your blog hence your responsibility: besides you know what you want to say and what you wish to disclaim responsibility for so why not do it yourself.

  7. Victates says:

    Didn’t see your ‘copy’ comment, since that’s a later addition apparently. I wrote the above lengthy comment before I saw it: so I apologise for that.

    As for ‘haters’: I don’t believe I even introduced the term since its both asnine. I don’t think I’ve ever described someone as that beyond doing so in response to someone using it to me.

    I’d stop presuming I am an ‘anti-racist’ as well… since that’s what you seem to be doing and I can’t really see a reason for it other than a silly presumptive ‘us’ and ‘them’.

  8. incogman says:

    I’ll have to read your comments just as soon as I finish “War and Peace.” lol.

    You can take my copy and add blockquote at the beginning (enclose the word with the clarets >) and /blockquote (enclose the word with the clarets >) at the end.

    Also, cut back my copy with “…” as much as possible, please.

    Otherwise, I’ll have to run your stuff as a blog post by itself. Which you might like.

  9. Victates says:

    If you respond in a blog post: I will respond on SC.

    Probably easier like that anyway, but if you don’t like lengthy discussion then I would suggest you leave the JQ alone for it requires many ‘War and Peace’ volumes. It isn’t a ‘wham bam thank you ma’am’ topic if you want to put it slightly crudely.

  10. VonShlepp says:

    “Germany’s unforgivable crime before the second world war,” Churchill said,” was her attempt to extricate her economic power from the world’s trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit.” (Churchill to Lord Robert Boothby, quoted in the Foreword, 2nd Ed. Sydney Rogerson, ‘Propaganda in the Next War’)

    “He [Hitler] took over for himself the privilege of manufacturing money and not only physical moneys, but also financial ones; he took over the untouched machinery of falsification and put it to work for the benefit of the state… Are you capable of imagining what would have come …if it had infected a number of other states and brought about the creation of a period of autarchy [absolute rule, replacing that of the bankers]. If you can, then imagine its counterrevolutionary functions…” – Christian Rakovsky

    “The Nazis came to power in 1933 when the German economy was in total collapse, with ruinous war-reparation obligations and zero prospects for foreign investment or credit. Through an independent monetary policy of sovereign credit and a full-employment public-works program, the Third Reich was able to turn a bankrupt Germany, stripped of overseas colonies, into the strongest economy in Europe within four years, even before armament spending began.” (Henry C. K. Liu, “Nazism and the German Economic Miracle,” Asia Times (May 24, 2005).

    In Billions for the Bankers, Debts for the People (1984), Sheldon Emry commented:

    “Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 on, which accounts for Germany’s startling rise from the depression to a world power in five years. The German government financed its entire operations from 1935 to 1945 without gold, and without debt. It took the entire Capitalist and Communist world to destroy the German revolution, and bring Europe back under the heel of the Bankers.”

  11. incogman says:

    If you respond in a blog post: I will respond on SC.

    Probably easier like that anyway, but if you don’t like lengthy discussion then I would suggest you leave the JQ alone for it requires many ‘War and Peace’ volumes. It isn’t a ‘wham bam thank you ma’am’ topic if you want to put it slightly crudely.

    Will take this offer seriously. Need to wait a bit, first I need to check out what your blog is saying, etc. Plus, my hands are full with rabble rousing right now. lol.

    Yes, it can be a convoluted subject if you discourse on 1700 years on all the exceptions and chimera, etc.

    And, getting to a point you made earlier, Jewry is NOT some monolithic block. I know well that many Jews have different ideas and wishes. But they also know how they themselves are and that, too, is apparent.

    I guess you could say it was a difficult decision with me. And I wish for you and the rest of the people out there to know, I did every thing I could to NOT come to these evident conclusions.

    It’s simply too much to ignore or pretend it isn’t happening.

  12. tracy says:

    i also heard rumors tha incogman was gay. if he is then he should just come out already. why does he have to torture himself.

    i called the aryan nation and spoke to mr kreiss and i asked him if he had a problem with incogman. he said he didnt but some of the other group members did. he told me that incogman tried to rub up against a few guys there and they beat the shit out of him and thru him out of the group. they said this is why incogman has this website. because he is gay and he wants to hide behind a white proud nationalistic baner, which make one wonder,, incogman must be gay for trying so hard to show that he is anti everything.

  13. incogman says:

    Howdy, simone the funny young Jew. I approved this one little comment so as to share the laughs with my blog readers.

    You really need to become a stand-up comedy Jew, you know. Too much. I love the level of detail with the “mr kreiss” person.

  14. tracy says:

    hi buddy, im not jewish but i have many jewish friends who i happen to love. i am a white conservative christian that is proud of this country. i dont look at israel or the jews as the enemy.
    the enemy is people who are killing my people in every country thruout the globe.
    muslims are killing christians and burning down there churches while you sit back in your bedroom fighting the wrong war and the wrong people.

    i know its easier to blame the jews because they are outnumberd by us. i know your scared to make the muslims your enemy because they are very scary people and they are many.
    incogman, dont be scared and fight the people who are killing our brothers and sisters just because they are christians open your eyes

  15. incogman says:

    I let this one go thru too, but only because you were more respectful.

    However, you are so very wrong. If you are a Christian (which I doubt very much) then you have sucked down the Christian/Zionist pap till you’ve become a sorry Jew yourself.

    The Jew seeks to turn American Christians into a Noahide “Universal” church and eventually do away completely with Jesus Christ. To support these people because you’re brainwashed by corrupt evangelicals is truly pathetic and frightening to me.

    Outnumbered? What do you think is going on with our banking and media? Did you not read anything above or are you just wishing to be a little pest?

  16. KickTheJewsOutOfTheUSA says:

    Victates, what’s your take on Brother Nathanael @ realjewnews.com?

  17. incogman says:

    Real motive… well our weltanschauung, National Socialism, would be the motive. We are both NS in the real meaning of the term not ‘Sieg Heil! At one’s television’ ‘nazis’ (or should be say that is what jews think a National Socialist is and the neos just believed their television screens). NS is an elite ideology, its a way of thinking and living (NS know NS: call it a feeling in one’s blood) , and we have extremely high standards and that part of that means we have to responsibility for things. Myself and Lionaxe are specialists in the jewish question (myself in jewish history and Lionaxe in jewish theology) and hence we are intellectually revamping anti-Semitism to make en-pointe, accurate and intellectually appealing.

    That means taking out and discrediting the idiots, such as Duke, one by one. Oliver and Pierce have a lot more going for them intellectually but are unfortunately little read and even less understood.

    As for the snide reference to ‘my God’ inferring that myself and Lionaxe are jewish, I am sorry to disappoint you but he is an agnostic and I am a Roman Catholic.

    You seem to be presuming both of us are ‘antis’, as the parlance goes, actually its the other side. I’ve been through nearly everything ‘WN’ has to offer in terms of literature and found it to be extremely wanting (low on substance, high on meaningless rhetoric).

    Well, Victates, I’ve been reading your above scree and must say that you two (LionAxe) are quite the pair. You’ve taking such a high road to all of this that few may even have the courage to look up, let alone attempt to scale the heights you two reside.

    And can you blame anyone for summararily dismissing you as antis? I think not! I will admit to a strange facination in reading your post, nevertheless.

    Now, be honest here: Do you really think that being NS will mean anything but shouts of “Seig Heil” from the masses conditioned by Jew media all this time? Regardless of the purity of political thinking that you espouse?

    One reason I left in your business about the writers you mentioned is that you may have a point or two, but fail to consider how people will understand these deliniations.

    The one theme that seems to run thru-out your post is that everybody but you and Lionaxe needs to shut the hell up about everything. “We are intellectually revamping [defining] a new ‘anti-semitism’ [for the ages].” Now, what kind of hypocrisy is all that, when you so often appear to defend Jewry to begin with? Curious, to say the least.

    I mean look at the comment from the Christian Zionist above, for example. You think for one moment that this kind of person is going to even take the time reading what you say to begin with, let alone aspire to the heights of NS political dogma (maybe even Aryan spirituality? [“a feeling in one’s blood”]) that I THINK you are alluding to?

    I’ll get to the other paras later.

  18. Victates says:

    (Victates, what’s your take on Brother Nathanael @ realjewnews.com?)

    Can’t say I’d come across him before, but he seems to be another Benjamin Freedman type case i.e. a jude seeks Freudian relief from himself by becoming an ‘anti-Semite’ although if you wish to be conspiratorial about it he could be part of a jude conspiracy (which is the other prominent explanation if you want to view it from a Racial angle). Henry Makow is another similar example but one who has found a different way of expressing that Freudian instinct the jews inherit as a race. I believe MacDonald came up with another plausible explanation for this behaviour in his second book (on the theory of anti-Semitism), but off hand I can’t remember the exact details of it.

    I’d also state that my first thought when viewing his sight was that it was a form of jewish humour, which is still an impression I get strongly even if you take him on his word. Since a jew is a jew is a jew, especially one who claims to be an ‘anti-Semite’. I’ve been around too many jews not to feel a slight twitch around stereotypical jewish reproductions of things, which as I say I see all to often in their humour.

    I also quickly browsed his little information essays and they seem to be verbatim reproductions of Russian material (i.e. pro-Putin when Putin is largely in bed with jews despite ‘WN’ claims I’ve seen on VNN and SF) and Russian anti-jewish motifs from the ‘Black Hundreds’ (1932 Ukrainian starvation, jews are satanic etc). He also isn’t producing anything particularly new and he’s quite seriously off on his historical pieces as far as I can see. For example this: http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=86.

    Never-the-less I’ll have to go through his stuff with a finer comb in due course, but I trust him with facts as much as I trust Alan Dershowitz with the truth. If you see my point: I always cross check what juden say as far as I am able, because they love to lie as a group and seem to see nothing wrong in doing so.

  19. Victates says:

    Incog,

    Fair enough: but as I said I will expect some kind of response in the next month or two.

    (And, getting to a point you made earlier, Jewry is NOT some monolithic block. I know well that many Jews have different ideas and wishes. But they also know how they themselves are and that, too, is apparent.’)

    Just one prefactory question: what is with the 1700 years thing? *Curious* Since it doesn’t correlate with anything particularly major in jewish history. 1500-1600 would and so would 1800 but 1700 is something of a mystery to me.

    Indeed, they are not a monolithic bloc and they do indeed know what they themselves are. As Weckert (in ‘Flashpoint’) has observed jews are actually more vicious to each other and to other Semites than anyone else. Much as how the Arabs their racial kin tend to be.

    However as you say the above then I have to wonder why you do not draw such distinctions beyond the tad faux one between NK and Zionism. As Lionaxe briefly highlighted here: http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php/do-you-want-done-jews-489015p213.html

    Also of interest is why you, in your work, tend to treat jews, particularly Zionists, as a monolithic bloc. Since your comment would suggest you are aware for example of the differences in their Zionism of left wing Laborites/Haaretz jews (and JStreet in the US) and Likudniks/JPost jews (and NORPAC/AIPAC/AJC/WZO/ADL etc in the US). However you don’t bring those differences up in your arguments, even though they are particularly relevant to them, as far as I can see. I also haven’t seen you comment particularly on the Zionism/Communism issue, which is quite important in terms of understanding jewish power in the Western world.

    It just seems to me, perhaps I am wrong, that you say one thing but then say another. I am not accusing you of lying or deliberate misrepresentation but I also don’t see how your logic follows since it seems to walk into a few dead ends if you like.

    (I guess you could say it was a difficult decision with me. And I wish for you and the rest of the people out there to know, I did every thing I could to NOT come to these evident conclusions.)

    And these evident conclusions are? I won’t object or agree unless I know what you are concluding and why. Although I can guess the general tenor of what it likely is. It still needs to be clarified and then you’d need to state how deductive logic, which is the sort you are inferring you are using, brought you to those conclusions. Its important to inform those that read your work of how you have come to your conclusions and how you answer X, Y and Z other evidence that might seem to contradict them.

    (It’s simply too much to ignore or pretend it isn’t happening.)

    What’s happening then your view? I know quite well what happens in the world and how the world works for reasons I’d rather not disclose. I tend to find that when you can predict the jews and the balance of power between the elite groups then you know you are right. Unfortunately people often take such a simplistic approach of ‘jews rule everything’ (placing too much focus on high finance) that it blinds them to how things do work or more precisely how the jews work.

  20. Victates says:

    Incog:

    Thank you for the compliment, but I’d rather get down to brass tacks. I apologise in advance since this is going to be a long response I think, but I will be brief where I can as you requested.

    ‘And can you blame anyone for summararily dismissing you as antis? I think not!’

    Ehrm… yes I can. It is quite evident from what I write that I am dedicated anti-Semite, the fundamental difference between someone like me and someone like you, I mean no particular offense, is that you are content to condemn jews on the standard grounds with the standard literature. There is little evolution there and precious little critique of other’s anti-jewish views in order for allow them to evolve. Has anyone hauled Duke up on his sources on say the Bolshevik revolution (i.e. Wilton), which they should have noticed pretty quickly or hauled Oliver up on his article on the Protocols (a more advanced version of ‘Marsden’s’ argument).

    I reject this atttitude of not looking at the basis for arguments, especially when they often quite old, and new information has come to light since. For example the jews control the USSR was a tenable, and largely correct argument on the facts available, until the fall of the USSR and the invention of the internet when new data became available.

    I realised a long while ago that most ‘WN’ anti-jewish arguments could be countered by skeptics fairly easily as I myself come from a background of countering the ‘Illuminati’ claims issue, specifically Alex Jones ideas there-of. The fact is unless you improve and evolve your arguments they will be outmoded, ‘debunked’ (whether that debunk is cogent or not is another matter) and relegated to the sidelines. This means stinging critique is necessary as well as the willingness to go to the root of the problem by flushing out all the old stuff and examing it to see what is sound and what is not sound.

    I deal with the unsound stuff at the moment, because it needs immediate attention, because it is often used as ‘evidence’ by people like you.

    Think of it like building a house. To do so you need to clear away the site and make sure that the ground is sound. Otherwise you would build a ‘giant with feet of clay’ as Butz described the ‘holocaust’.

    ‘I will admit to a strange facination in reading your post, nevertheless.’

    Yes, I get that from rabbis and jewish academics as well. They usually end up calling me some kind of derivative of Agagite or Amalek depending on their ideas. *shrugs*

    ‘Now, be honest here: Do you really think that being NS will mean anything but shouts of “Seig Heil” from the masses conditioned by Jew media all this time? Regardless of the purity of political thinking that you espouse?’

    Heh: of course not. But what you don’t understand is what NS is. NS is an evolutionary weltanschauung, or philosophy of life, if you think we’d reform the SA, march around with swazis and replay the kampfzeit or even call ourselves NS to people who don’t endorse it in some kind of way then you don’t understand it. Although I don’t blame you, because it isn’t per se obvious unless you’ve either read a lot of NS original work and understood it. Or you have had a mentor. The latter is the more usual since like any subject you need to have somebody to come back and critique what you think and explain why.

    As for NS and the Folk: again you don’t comprehend man or propaganda as it happens. You essentially offer, although I dare say unwittingly, a marxist view of things by presuming brain washing to be in effect, which of course relies on tabula rasa theory, which should be (and rightly so) an anathema to Racialism. Indeed, I and others like me, although not Lionaxe, have experimented with this and if you tell explain the principles and ideas of National Socialism to them they will 9/10 say ‘Oh that’s a good idea.’ and then you tell them ‘Oh, that’s National Socialism by-the-way’ and they look you funny and say something in region of ‘Oh, really?’

    Then if you carefully take them under your wing and explain things carefully while understanding what they have been through and caring for them then you create folk who are firstly happy, secondly are appalled at what is going on around them and third, are loyal to the National Socialist ideal but who do not associate with the ‘neo-nazis’, such as the NSM/ANSWP et al for they quite realise they are not us and we are not them. We are Aryans (and we also don’t feel the need to go romp around in front of television cameras), they are by en-large crypto jews in the same vein as say the JDL/JDO in essence.

    There are a very few who can understand on their own, but they are a minority. Why would bring me into a long dissertation on National Socialism, which isn’t really relevant here. Suffice to say ‘WN’ has been rejected by the Folk, because they thought it was the new NS and they just found all ‘WNs’ want to do is to quote my fiance ‘scream about niggers pissing on their lawns, take drugs, have sex with whores, take money for speeches [etc]’. I am simplifying her comments, but they are very accurate when you realise they are about ‘WN’ leadership, especially Duke and Black. If you don’t believe me (and her) perhaps you should ask about those who went to eastern europe for one example and what in fact they did and achieved while they were there?

    (One reason I left in your business about the writers you mentioned is that you may have a point or two, but fail to consider how people will understand these deliniations.)

    Well that’s wrong. I have considered the issue, but you see again you mistake what I am doing and how propaganda needs to be organised. I write as you see from an intellectual perspective and I look at the basis of comments. I don’t write propaganda, but rather I write on the understanding of the issues, as well as the work that propagandists can then use as a basis for their propaganda. You see propaganda takes intellectual positions and it makes them palitable for the Folk: unless it bases itself on pointed critique and highly defensible intellectual foundations then as I pointed out to you earlier it will founder, because it will be destroyed by opponents and you will only attract the lowest common denominator generally speaking to you cause.

    ‘The one theme that seems to run thru-out your post is that everybody but you and Lionaxe needs to shut the hell up about everything. “We are intellectually revamping [defining] a new ‘anti-semitism’ [for the ages].” Now, what kind of hypocrisy is all that, when you so often appear to defend Jewry to begin with? Curious, to say the least.’

    They do need to shut the hell up, because they are helping jews with their hysterics on anything from the Protocols (still common currency among ‘WNs’) to jews and 9/11 (which Lionaxe has addressed more than once). The simple fact of the matter is that people need to back up what they say properly and to do that they need to be open to critique. Which is apparently very difficult for your average ‘WN’/’neo-nazi’ to do without screaming ‘jew!’

    Although I must confess it isn’t to ‘WNs’ I write, for you are generally what I consider intellectually broken, because the ‘WN’ movement has long attracted the lowest common denominator within the Folk and not the sort of people it needs to create what it wants. I address ‘WN’ arguments, because they are typical, but rather I write to as I said form the basis of arguments to be used many years hence. I think long not short term for Rome was not built in a day and nor was it built on undrained swampy ground.

    Ah yes the ‘defend jews’ thing: quite stereotypical I must say. If you’d read my blog you should have noticed:

    A) I wrote a post addressing this to explain why SC exists.

    B) I wrote a few posts addressing both the understanding of jews and using a point of their history (Rabbinical Rule in central and eastern Europe) to show how one should begin to engage in critique of them, which admittedly isn’t extensive at the moment, but it is where I am going.

    If you want I can link to them?

    Besides if you note I haven’t actually been defending jews at all since I don’t believe anywhere I have said jews are good or are even particularly defensible, but rather what I say is that this anti-Semitic argument is wrong, because of X, Y and Z and then offered (or will offer) some comments on the issue to point out where the credible parts are to the argument if there are any.

    I’d speculate that you are too far into the ‘us’ and ‘them’ attitude. I would suggest reading carefully what I write and how I explain issues: if I attack an argument then it is usually with good reason. If you disagree then you should say why being specific as to the why rather than doing the whole ‘you defend jews’ thing. I am interested in the facts and what truthful interpretation can be offered of them to fight my enemy: the jews. I am not interested in simply spouting rhetoric and older outdated arguments, which get used because people seem to be lazy to do anything about looking into them to see if they are still cogent.

    (I mean look at the comment from the Christian Zionist above, for example. You think for one moment that this kind of person is going to even take the time reading what you say to begin with, let alone aspire to the heights of NS political dogma (maybe even Aryan spirituality? [“a feeling in one’s blood”]) that I THINK you are alluding to?)

    Heh: actually Christian Zionists are exactly the sort of market segment you should be looking at, because they have all the basics of a good electoral base if you wanted to get elected. You just have apply a knowledge of jews to them as well as have a little theological support, which granted will be provided in due course. They aren’t my specific area, but others whose areas they are have had a lot of success with them, because they are often very good people, but they have been taught to believe in a pack of lies purported by jews and by Protestant clerics who in the vein of Calvin have been supportive of jews. By abandoning these Folk you serve no one’s interest, because they are the majority and you are the minority. The jews don’t love them and they never will. The jews will abandon the Christian Zionists sooner or later to fend for themselves and yet still expect allegiance from them. You have to care for them not condemn them out of hand without thinking about the issue at great length.

    Think how to use what the jews have taught Christian Zionists against the jews. Don’t go against the grain, but rather think how you can bend it then you might realise why I just said what I said.

    Again you misunderstand NS and it isn’t political dogma. Since it isn’t really political science, but rather science and philosophy applied to politics. It also isn’t dogmatic, apart from in the sense of the evolutionary principle and the basic fundamentals of the weltanschauung. This is likely flying over your head, and again I mean no offense, but the subtle distinctions that I am making here are basic NS thought and not what you likely believe is NS thought (which you are treating in the same way jews do on television documentaries I might add). I severely doubt you know what Aryan spirituality is, again with no offense intended, considering that my fiance is the one who as I recall revived the concept on SF when she was there and it often gets said without the understanding of what is.

    And here endth the lesson… sorry for the ‘War and Peace’ volume, but as I said at the start. I like to explain myself properly and I’ve been as brief as I can be as well as generalising a lot.

  21. Victates says:

    Oh I should add that I am by temperament an extreme authoritarian with an academic background: if you hadn’t noticed that already. I am quite happy to discuss things intellectually, but I tend to get polemical so you’ll have to excuse my tone. I am not as intellectually kind as Lionaxe and the others are. I am something of an intellectual rottweiler if you want an analogy.

  22. Victates says:

    Sorry something I just thought to say. I am not after creating copies of me or Lionaxe: what I am after doing in terms of people is to firstly create a culture where critique is at least accepted and at best warm applauded. Also I recognise I might be wrong, but if I wrong I want to be shown why and then I will re-orientate accordingly.

    I am also interested in getting other people to think critically on the jewish question and to be fair to the jew, Br. Nathaniel on that website that ‘KickJewsOutOfTheUSA’ asked my opinion on, he has done quite a lot of original research even if his general sources and arguments are standard line stuff without any apparent critical evaluation.

    I respect that even if I don’t agree with or trust what he writes, because I want to see anti-jewish thought evolve and if somebody is at least doing some literature research, even if its the older ‘movement’ literature, then its the very least a start and their views are of interest. Since in order to create the future you need to get people thinking and talking at the intellectual level first and then the journalistic level about the jews.

    At least we’ve seen a start here Incog between you and me. I apologise if I am clogging up your blog a bit, but I’ve got nothing in particular to do today but research and write.

  23. incogman says:

    Lord, have mercy.

    Victates, did they hurriedly arrive at the broadband internet protocols once you opened your mouth? lol

  24. Victates says:

    *shrugs* I am not that bad (comparatively), but once I start writing I write quite a lot, which is probably why I can write quite large books quite quickly: heh.

    If you hadn’t noticed jews are much the same so its useful to be able to keep up. 🙂

  25. incogman says:

    Yeah, I bet you were quite the hit on the staff of Encyclopedia Britainica (or Encyclopedia Judaica).

  26. Victates says:

    Oh I just wanted to say that I am pretty sure that http://www.realjewnews.com/ is some jew’s idea of a sick joke or the jew who runs it is a serious headcase.

    It could be either (or even both), but it strikes as a varient on the following website’s jewish humour theme: http://www.internationaljewishconspiracy.com/.

  27. incogman says:

    Nah, I’m going to have to disagree entirely. I think brother Nathan is real. He’s just a little over the top with the Christian business. I wonder why you can’t see that or pretend not to.

    Yeah, it’s all a pretty funny joke to the regular Jews, but it’s also apparent that it’s a nervous laughter.

    You claim to be a National Socialist, but this in no way means you are a White (it’s an assumption based on Nazi stereotypes). Technically, you could just as easily be a National Socialist for a country in Africa or something.

    You claim you are acting as a intellectual enforcer of truth, and you pretty much discount everything — consigning it all to the realm of crop circles and swamp monsters. Is it possible that you are throwing out the baby with the bath water or are just in it to take spiteful intellectual (or Jewish) fun at mudding the waters?

    I see little that you bring to the table other than interesting discussions. I’ve asked you to clarify my “disclaimer” note paragraph to one more accurate with your level of knowledge. With the amount of mouthing you do, it would seem to be nothing for you to quickly spew forth.

    But you deftly sidestep the matter. Then you also tell me that your views may be over my head (but no offense, of course) and then proceed with another burst of mental gymnastics.

    Let’s be honest: I write here to awaken my fellow Whites in America to what they now fasionably call a “clear and present danger” (American author Tom Clancy). You insist the world is too impossibly amorpheus and disorganized for any such thing.

    I think you are wrong. Dead wrong.

  28. incogman says:

    And another thing: I fully admit I am not a brilliant writer on par with someone like Revilio Oliver, William Pierce or Patrick Grimm on this subject. I’m better at the image than the writing, I well know.

    One of the things you mentioned was brother Nathan’s somewhat crude graphics as an indication of wackyness. You can be an Einstein on a subject and your whole message will be ignored by people who only judge things by the cover. That’s always been a big problem.

    I don’t pretend to be a intellectual giant, but I know bullshit when I see it.

  29. tracy says:

    incogman, i cant argue with you anymore about me being christian. if i was jewish i would tell you. if i was a christian zionist i would tell you. why would i hide behind being a jew or a christian zionist? are you so shocked that millions of christians support israel and like jews?

    i think it really bothers you with that being the case. anyway, your fighting the wrong people. it sounds like your very jelous of jewish people because they happen to be sucsessful. well im not jelous. i respect them, but i hate fucking muslims because of this…
    http://www.sullivan-county.com/id3/kill_christ.htm

  30. incogman says:

    Why do you continue to persist on using trolling tactics (like the extraneous comments I just deleted) to get your point across? How about you make the point and let it stand and if I want to respond, I will.

    Why don’t read some of the other things here and stew on it for awhile?

  31. incogman says:

    i dont understand. what do you mean that im using trolling tactics and why would you delete my other comments? what was so bad what i said?

    Don’t give my that bullshit, simone. I know who you are. Your little Aryan nation/Homo bit was all too obvious.

    The deleted comments were exactly what you said on the last one I let thru. You keep this up and I’ll just send you to Cartoon Land for good and you’ll have to redo your IP address again.

    So shut the flock up!

  32. Todd says:

    I heard Bro. Nathaniel on a Rense interview and was struck by his emotional outrage of young Palestinian deaths at the hands of the IDF. The man started to cry and his voice was very somber. I can’t imagine that this man was making that up spontaneously. It seemed very genuine and heartfelt. Of course I did not see him with my own eyes.

    I feel he is over the top too with his outfit and street evangelism, yet genuinely concerned about jew crime. I applaud him, if he wakes up people. I feel he is the real deal.

  33. incogman says:

    I agree, Todd. My comment above about seeing bullshit was not meant for brother Nathan. I think he was sickened by his Jewish brethren’s actions in the world and he was struck to the core.

    He’s doing everything he can to make things right with his God. He may look crazy but that doesn’t mean he is. Especially with his insight on the workings to Jews.

    The Jews often attack strong messengers as crazy. That’s a common tactic against the 9/11 truth movement. A former Jew gets Jews really angry, like the group Jews for Jesus.

    They hate that kind of thing. It turns them into whirling demons from hell!

  34. Victates says:

    (Nah, I’m going to have to disagree entirely. I think brother Nathan is real. He’s just a little over the top with the Christian business. I wonder why you can’t see that or pretend not to.)

    I said he was either practicing a rather weird version of jewish humour or he was a little wrong in the head (either or and). As I said I am unsure which but call it experience having dealt with no a few of these buggers and their rather erm… Freudian sense of humour.

    Wonder all you like I simply disagree with you based on my comprehension of jews and my considerable experience picking them apart. But lets not beat around the bush Incog you are flat out calling me a jew, while trying not to say it openly.

    (Yeah, it’s all a pretty funny joke to the regular Jews, but it’s also apparent that it’s a nervous laughter.)

    Well depends on if you think their laughter is nervous or bemused, but then we’ed have to go and hear this nervous laughter. I’ve seem jews nervous before… I mean actually nervous… I don’t mean pretending to be offending, which is usually mixed up with it. Have you Incog? Have you read any Freud? I ask because if you had devoted even a month or two to its study you might understand what I just said rather than pretend you do.

    ‘You claim to be a National Socialist, but this in no way means you are a White (it’s an assumption based on Nazi stereotypes). Technically, you could just as easily be a National Socialist for a country in Africa or something.’

    I don’t claim anything: I am a National Socialist. That actually does mean I have to be Aryan, because if I was not Aryan, then I would prefigure National Socialism into a new form specific to whatever race I was a member of. However it wouldn’t be National Socialism, but rather it would be whatever I had created in my own racial prism. Your assertion that it would mean I could be any race belies firstly your own simple ignorance of Racialism (and you what old bean… a ‘White Nationalist’… a so called racist, but yet you didn’t even use race as your lens for understanding the world do you?) and second your inability to understand a complex issue (I mean for heavens sake you could have done the so-called ‘White thing’ and asked for clarification) in that you have constantly failed to actually comprehend what is being explained to you.

    Oh and yes I before you try and claim anything to the contrary: I am of northern-western European stock. I’d have to be to be what I am and to think how I do.

    By your antics: I’d say you’ve got a little Slav in you or perhaps a heavy dose of Med., but unless I took a swab I wouldn’t know for sure.

    ‘You claim you are acting as a intellectual enforcer of truth, and you pretty much discount everything — consigning it all to the realm of crop circles and swamp monsters. Is it possible that you are throwing out the baby with the bath water or are just in it to take spiteful intellectual (or Jewish) fun at mudding the waters?’

    Ah yes mark two of the stereotype… I am an ‘enemy agent’ of some type. You’ve been reading too much Jones and Rense, Incog, implicitly suggesting your opponent works for the government in some kind of espionage capacity is a very old CT excuse for not going en-pointe and generally not being prepared to concede an inch (which by-the-way is copied straight from jewish strategy if you were unaware). It doesn’t do anything but make you look like rather foolish.

    So are you going to the next step in the conspiratorial spiral?

    Am I throwing the baby out with the bath water: if you read my work rather than pretending you had then you would well know that I don’t. I’ve already explained, generalising at your request, my reasoning which I note you’ve not bothered addressing or offering a contrasting rational on. I offered to show you where if you’d done what you suggest you had, been through the blog entries, how this was being done and asked you to read what I had written rather than merely claiming you had read (and infer you had understood it). I’ve made some pointed and precise criticisms of jewry in both my points against anti-Semitic arguments and in my general examples of how an argument could be made. I’ve also expressed a willingness to answer questions or queries, which I note again you do exactly as jewish rabbis do. You focus on the person and their beliefs/motivations rather than the arguments they offer.

    I am not calling you jewish as you’ve all but called me (i.e. inferred it much as you’ve done to Lionaxe), but you don’t seem to comprehend just how much jewishness has seeped into you. That isn’t an insult: its merely an observation that I’ve heard many a person make. What did Werner Sombart (a jew) say in essence.. ‘Americanism is distilled Judaism’, in essence he wasn’t far wrong if one introduced a few caveats into the mix.

    ‘I see little that you bring to the table other than interesting discussions. I’ve asked you to clarify my “disclaimer” note paragraph to one more accurate with your level of knowledge. With the amount of mouthing you do, it would seem to be nothing for you to quickly spew forth.’

    You asked me to clarify your disclaimer: why should I help you as I said it is your site/blog and hence your responsibility? I am hardly going to sit here and help you by doing that after you refuse to actually get down to brass tacks i.e. specific discussion. I’ve made specific points here-there and everywhere ranging from ‘WN’ internal politics to the Christian Talmudic controversies arising from the conversion of Nicholas Donin (we could also discuss Neophyte of Moldova, which perhaps would also be relevant given your support of the jew of realjewnews [a very similar case it would appear if the latter is genuine, which I am less than certain of (I could explain precisely why but I am of the opinion you wouldn’t comprehend it anyway)]). You’ve failed to engage specifically in anything and have just made excuses for your own lack of knowledge.

    You’ve been given ample opportunity before to justify yourself and yet you never really have but rather come back and repeat the same tired tripe over and over.

    If you write utter huey then people will respond with corrections that is about the sum of it. You bring nothing to the table other than your own lack of cognitive ability: you rant and rave then slither away to just produce the same arguments again. Oh and you claim you ‘disagree’ with something, but the slight problem is you can never quite articulate why. That is always what some call the classic sign of ‘woo!’ you want to believe something, but you have to rationalise why you believe but yet don’t want to engage in productive discussion about it.

    ‘But you deftly sidestep the matter. Then you also tell me that your views may be over my head (but no offense, of course) and then proceed with another burst of mental gymnastics.’

    I’ve sidestepped nothing other than your pontifications about your disclaimer, which firstly aren’t relevant to the topics under discussion and secondly are your responsibility not mine as I’ve explained above. My ideas are over your head for the simple reason that you have displayed no understanding of them, you’ve presumed them to be things I haven’t said, you’ve asked for no clarification (you haven’t clarified your meaning or arguments either when I’ve asked you to), you’ve made strawmen arguments and you’ve generally contended yourself with trying to discern my ‘motivations’, which again is something rabbis consistently ask me very quickly.

    (Let’s be honest: I write here to awaken my fellow Whites in America to what they now fasionably call a “clear and present danger” (American author Tom Clancy). You insist the world is too impossibly amorpheus and disorganized for any such thing.)

    I have not said nor insisted anything of the kind, but rather what you claim is often wrong, because you make factual assertions that even the most cursory examination of the literature and the evidence should tell you are wrong (e.g. Khazars equals Ashkenazim, the Talmud openly states the Gentiles are cattle etc). I haven’t sat down and explained how the world works too: I’ve given you some analogies to understand the jews, answered your questions, given you a little background on NS and very briefly explained some general political concepts to you such as propaganda as well as give you some recommended reading.

    If I am wrong Incog: you have neither proven it nor even really argued it.

    I think we can safely say that you’ve maxed yourself out in terms of discourse potential, so I think we shall have to say adieu here. If you respond to my responsa then drop Lionaxe a line and I’ll respond. Otherwise I suggest you do some research, do some thinking and actually make some decent arguments of your own once in a while.

  35. KickTheJewsOutOfTheUSA says:

    I try to read what Victates posts, but all of it looks like this:

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Duis eget neque. Nulla turpis mauris, congue ac, adipiscing in, dapibus nec, massa. Sed vulputate mi quis magna. Cras pellentesque, diam ac consectetuer adipiscing, est purus dictum dui, quis luctus nibh nulla quis urna. Quisque sed libero. Pellentesque porta, purus a gravida rutrum, ipsum dolor vulputate tellus, quis varius magna nunc et mauris. Sed pretium hendrerit pede. Nulla auctor, felis at lobortis commodo, massa lectus feugiat turpis, sit amet auctor lectus erat non dui. Sed posuere vestibulum nisi. Cras mi arcu, egestas sit amet, hendrerit eget, dignissim id, ipsum. Mauris a quam sit amet leo molestie vehicula.

    Donec vestibulum sapien eu nulla. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Praesent lobortis sollicitudin leo. Aenean porttitor scelerisque lacus. Duis ultrices, diam vel tincidunt pulvinar, eros massa aliquet quam, sit amet gravida augue mauris sit amet pede. Sed suscipit, eros eu ultrices semper, enim diam lacinia elit, quis dictum ligula nunc in nulla. Vivamus nec mi et lorem volutpat consectetuer. Aenean tempus suscipit ante. Nulla eu enim. Fusce sit amet erat at felis rhoncus pellentesque. Ut vitae libero ut tellus sodales tristique. Nunc vehicula, nunc id dictum faucibus, arcu elit condimentum ante, sit amet aliquam nibh risus sit amet purus. Aliquam eu tortor. Vestibulum purus leo, congue nec, semper vitae, pretium at, augue.

    Nam et purus varius orci consequat elementum. Maecenas ac dui eu nunc porttitor tristique. Quisque non lacus. Integer ipsum nibh, fringilla at, tempor sit amet, luctus vitae, quam. Integer non lectus vitae dui feugiat suscipit. Nullam neque nunc, vulputate nec, pretium eget, tempus a, nisl. Suspendisse vehicula, ante et elementum pulvinar, libero mi molestie mi, sed interdum diam dolor quis neque. Morbi mattis. Quisque consequat lectus sed est cursus fringilla. Cras erat. Suspendisse pharetra velit ut tellus. Aenean id risus. Donec tristique massa nec nibh. Cras dignissim elementum eros. Pellentesque augue sem, bibendum vel, lacinia sed, blandit vitae, nunc. Etiam et risus non dui ullamcorper sagittis.

    Proin in est vel nulla volutpat malesuada. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Maecenas iaculis, eros ac vulputate gravida, neque nibh euismod mi, bibendum eleifend nibh mi at nibh. In at magna. Quisque in ante. Quisque tincidunt felis id metus. Suspendisse libero. Vestibulum mauris. Praesent sit amet justo consectetuer turpis interdum interdum. In lacus dui, lacinia sit amet, venenatis nec, tincidunt eget, neque. Integer lectus pede, iaculis sit amet, ultricies adipiscing, congue sed, pede. Nunc vestibulum lectus ac nunc. Suspendisse ante ligula, mattis in, ullamcorper eu, malesuada a, augue.

    Proin ante odio, luctus ut, pharetra ut, lobortis id, velit. Aliquam non mi. Praesent laoreet tristique nibh. Ut volutpat vehicula lorem. Duis consectetuer diam id erat. Fusce convallis nulla nec orci. Nulla ut sem a mi suscipit posuere. Curabitur faucibus mauris et neque. Integer vel enim quis risus feugiat facilisis. Suspendisse hendrerit gravida ante. Proin dignissim nunc rhoncus nisl. Nulla diam. Nam consequat pellentesque dolor. Proin tristique sagittis massa. Phasellus eu justo ut sem vestibulum varius. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Aliquam dictum lorem ut felis. Sed condimentum gravida sapien.

  36. incogman says:

    Victates: You know something, you kill me.

    First, you don’t even allow commenting on your dam site and then you come on here like some holier-than-thou smarty pants something or other. Hell, reading your comments is like brain taffy — nothing but a sticky morass of big words mixed with hot air.

    I responded to your “Part One to INCOG” (wow, I’m famous) on your blog in MY POST on the Israelites. I suggest you go take a read. Or maybe you have and found it just a little too biting for you, eh?

    OK, so GOI officially means Gentile or race (or maybe nation but that’s buried deep in Genesis). So what? Like Svartze means black, it’s still a pejorative for Negroes just like Goyim has taken to mean “cattle” in the Yiddish nation. Goyishe Kopf means stupid head.

    “Traitors and Epicureans and Apostates are worse than Goim”
    (38) cf. Israelita, No. 48, 1891

    And the Jews often themselves talk excitedly about their roots in Khazaria. Hell, archeologists just discovered the ancient remains of the capital and this news made Tel Aviv all a-twitter:

    Among other Jewish sources supporting the Jewish identity of the Khazars is a letter written by Avraham ibn Daud, a renowned writer, who reported meeting rabbinical students from Khazar in Toledo, Spain in the mid-12th century. The well-renowned Schechter Letter recounts a different version of the conversion of the Khazar king, and mentions Benjamin ben Menachem as a Khazar king. Saadia Gaon, considered by many to be the greatest rabbi of his generation in the 10th century, also spoke favorably of Khazars in his writings.

    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/127483

    So I guess all those great rabbis a thousand years ago and closer to the action were just as screwed up as little old me, right?

    Your little back and forth brain games is enough to make anyone call you something — Jewish or something else entirely. That pains you greatly to have anyone suspect you of ulterior motives.

    But you do ZILCH to counter it. Instead of taking a few moments of your precious time and typing a one paragraph document that I can use as a disclaimer (after me researching it), you spend more time with the BS reasons why you won’t. Hence, you must NOT WANT my message to become any stronger.

    Can you even deign to consider why people might suspect you? And you get so offended by that. Oh, boohoo.

    Then you give me hell just because I don’t deliniate between right winger Zionists like the Likud or Kane versus conflicted little groups or tribes of nice Jews all over the place.

    Look at me (rhetorically): Do I friggen care?

  37. incogman says:

    Oh yeah, Victates, I bet you wear tweed jackets with leather elbow patches, don’t you? Smoking a meershem pipe as you grunt away at my comments, mortified that some American Goyim has the temerity to debate the finer points of ancient history.

    And all this with everything else going on due to current Jew misbehavior: I’m going to forget all about the dam bankers and go looking for the professors to garrote!

  38. Todd says:

    Dude, it’s taking me a full 10 seconds to scroll down this page and put in a comment. That Latin text joke is hilarious. And the tweed jacket imagery is off the hook. I love this site.

  39. incogman says:

    Yeah, that Victates is some wordy SOB, alright. Sure hate to get stuck in a elevator with him. lol

  40. Greg Bacon says:

    It’s all Bin Laden’s Fault, really

    That Bin Laden is such a shrewd one!

    Here I thought he was a Muslim, yet he managed to get Jews appointed to 80% of the seats on the governing board of the nation’s money supply, the Federal Reserve.

    The Fed not only looked the other way when this MBS time bomb started ticking, they cranked up the money presses to warp speed and flooded Wall Street with trillions of dollars in cash to fiance the MBS scheme.

    And for Bin Laden to maneuver, first Alan GREENSPAN and then Ben BERNANKE into being head of the Federal Reserve was sheer genius. Guess BL was attracted to Bernanke’s middle name, SHALOM.

    All part of Bin Laden’s master plan? That guy must be one helluva chess player, if he can see moves years and years ahead and appoint some of his favorite buds, the Jews, to positions of authority on the Fed!

    Those Wall Street managers that helped run this scam and profited handsomely on this latest version of “Three Card Monte?”

    All disciples of Bin Laden.

    That pack of corrupt grifters AKA as the U.S. House and Senate, who wrote and pushed laws that removed the firewall between stock brokers and banks?

    All on Bin Laden’s payroll.

    BL also tricked the U.S. into invading a country that had NOTHING to do with 9/11, nor did it have WMD’s nor was it a threat to America, but Israel wanted Iraq destroyed.
    An invasion that will cost the USA trillions and trillions of dollars and lives lost.

    Who’d thunk that BL was an avid lover of Israel?

    CNN.com – Bin Laden: Goal is to bankrupt U.S. – Nov 1, 2004 — Does this 2004 threat bring back memories??

    Published on September 17th, 2008

    The Arabic-language network Al-Jazeera released a full transcript Monday of the most recent videotape from Osama bin Laden in which the head of al Qaeda said his groups goal is to force America into bankruptcy.

    Al-Jazeera aired portions of the videotape Friday but released the full transcript of the entire tape on its Web site Monday.

    “We are continuing this policy in bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy. Allah willing, and nothing is too great for Allah,” bin Laden said in the transcript.

    He said the mujahedeen fighters did the same thing to the Soviet Union in Afghanistan in the 1980s, “using guerrilla warfare and the war of attrition to fight tyrannical superpowers.”

    “We, alongside the mujahedeen, bled Russia for 10 years until it went bankrupt and was forced to withdraw in defeat,” bin Laden said.

  41. Todd says:

    Incog, Have you noticed how similar this sub-prime crisis compares to a giant trillion dollar slavery reparations bill. That kind of bill could never be overtly passed in Congress; but giving minorities and illegals sub-prime mortgages for ten years, on the backs of the US tax paying white majority would be so stealth.

    The PTB obviously have to even the playing field in the US before leveling the playing field for the third world citizens to institute the global world order. Obviously middle class white people do not figure heavily in the coming global slave plantation except as deracinated, negro accomodating miscegenationists(is that a word?). We must be marginalized, jailed and thieved entirely to get a NWO.

    Just saw that Obama supporter girls story and that is just sickening; hopefully she is a member of the ‘K’ chosen.

  42. incogman says:

    Yeah, they’ll find some way of funding ACORN (everybody needs to check them out) and Section 8 laws so as to give away more to Negroes.

    They’ll be throwing chicken legs and malt 45 liquor bottles in White yards all over. You watch.

  43. African Man says:

    “Victates!”

    Are you saying Ashkenazi/Khazar jews and jews of other races are on the same page?

    Damn straight! Never trust a jew until they denounce Judaism and the Talmud.

    Just because Ashkenazi jews are more powerful than other jews does not make the others less evil. Remember, Rome, Egypt and all the countries who had problems with jews? Those jews were no better than khazar jews.

  44. whitewraithe says:

    To Victates and Incogman, which I’m certain you’ve both read but allow me to refresh your memory.

    The Jews Are Not A Race

  45. incogman says:

    whitewraithe:

    Excellent article. I highly suggest everybody read it.

    However, many Jews consider themselves as a race and act as they are the Jews of the Bible. It’s all been a historical cluster-flock of insane porportions.

    I think they are the Criminal Network of all time!

    I believe there is a small subset of Ashkenazim who are using ancient criminal tactics and brainwashing techniques on the surrounding non-Khazars to advance themselves and live off us as parasites.

    Queen Victoria belonged to an ‘Israelite’ Society that traced the ancestry of its membership back to those lost tribes.

    This was when they insinuated themselves into British high society as crypto-Jews and why we have the Bank of England, the Federal Reserve and the Rothschilds (and their hidden confederates) owning America and England. These same Jews are behind destroying the White hold on our nations so as to retain their holdings.

    It cannot be doubted anymore. We need to rid ourselves of these human ticks before they suck us dry. They may have, already.

  46. Anonymous says:

    Well, I was really excited to see Victates analyze Marcus Eli Ravage in his latest blog entry:

    http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot.com/2008/10/on-jewish-traitors-marcus-eli-ravage.html

    Unfortunately, it’s just too wordy! Get to the point! Is what he wrote true or not? That’s all I want to know. Many words and no results.

    incogman, I will say that I love your laconic straight to the point approach. You help people learn and understand while at the same time allowing them to save time!

    Victates, I commend you for your work but the word count is unbearable!

  47. Anonymous says:

    What a surprise! The only stock exchange in the Green!

    http://i33.tinypic.com/mma2as.jpg

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *