The Frankfurt School: Conspiracy to Corrupt

By Timothy Matthews
Catholic Insight: March 2009
[INCOG: Notes in red are mine.]

Western civilization at the present day is passing through a crisis which is essentially different from anything that has been previously experienced. Other societies in the past have changed their social institutions or their religious beliefs under the influence of external forces or the slow development of internal growth. But none, like our own, has ever consciously faced the prospect of a fundamental alteration of the beliefs and institutions on which the whole fabric of social life rests … Civilization is being uprooted from its foundations in nature and tradition and is being reconstituted in a new organisation which is as artificial and mechanical as a modern factory.

Christopher Dawson. Enquiries into Religion and Culture, p. 259.

Most of Satan’s work in the world he takes care to keep hidden. But two small shafts of light have been thrown onto his work for me just recently. The first, a short article in the Association of Catholic Women’s ACW Review; the second, a remark (which at first surprised me) from a priest in Russia who claimed that we now, in the West, live in a Communist society. These shafts of light help, especially, to explain the onslaught of officialdom which in many countries worldwide has so successfully been removing the rights of parents to be the primary educators and protectors of their children.

The ACW Review examined the corrosive work of the ‘Frankfurt School’ – a group of German-American [JEWISH] scholars who developed highly provocative and original perspectives on contemporary society and culture, drawing on Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, and Weber. Not that their idea of a ‘cultural revolution’ was particularly new. ‘Until now’, wrote Joseph, Comte de Maistre (1753-1821) who for fifteen years was a Freemason, ‘nations were killed by conquest, that is by invasion: But here an important question arises; can a nation not die on its own soil, without resettlement or invasion, by allowing the flies of decomposition to corrupt to the very core those original and constituent principles which make it what it is.’

Commie Jew Willi Münzenberg

What was the Frankfurt School? Well, in the days following the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, it was believed that workers’ revolution would sweep into Europe and, eventually, into the United States. But it did not do so. Towards the end of 1922 the Communist International (Comintern) began to consider what were the reasons. On Lenin’s initiative a meeting was organised at the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow.

The aim of the meeting was to clarify the concept of, and give concrete effect to, a Marxist cultural revolution. Amongst those present were Georg Lukacs [JEWISH] a Hungarian aristocrat, son of a banker, who had become a Communist during World War I a good Marxist theoretician he developed the idea of ‘Revolution and Eros’ — sexual instinct used as an instrument of destruction) and Willi Munzenberg [JEWISH] (whose proposed solution was to ‘organise the intellectuals and use them to make Western civilisation stink.’

Only then, after they have corrupted all its values and made life impossible, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat’) ‘It was’, said Ralph de Toledano [JEWISH] (1916-2007) the conservative author and co-founder of the ‘National Review’, a meeting ‘perhaps more harmful to Western civilization than the Bolshevik Revolution itself.’


Photo from Willi Münzenberg’s Commie propaganda organ, “The Workers Pictorial Newspaper.” Published in Germany until the Nazis gave the commies the big boot. Note how today’s hypocrite Jew media always shows Americans photos of athletic Germans working out during the Nazi period as if it were something sinister and “machine-like.” This is the “other side” brainwashing the masses. [INCOG]

Lenin died in 1924 [AT LEAST PART JEWISH]. By this time, however, Stalin was beginning to look on Münzenberg, Lukacs and like-thinkers as ‘revisionists’. In June 1940, Münzenberg fled to the south of France where, on Stalin’s orders, a NKVD assassination squad caught up with him and hanged him from a tree.

In the summer of 1924, after being attacked for his writings by the 5th Comintern Congress, Lukacs moved to Germany, where he chaired the first meeting of a group of Communist-oriented sociologists, a gathering that was to lead to the foundation of the Frankfurt School.

This ‘School’ (designed to put flesh on their revolutionary programme) was started at the University of Frankfurt in the Institut für Sozialforschung. To begin with school and institute were indistinguishable. In 1923 the Institute was officially established, and funded by Felix Weil (1898-1975) [JEWISH]. Weil was born in Argentina and at the age of nine was sent to attend school in Germany. He attended the universities in Tübingen and Frankfurt, where he graduated with a doctoral degree in political science. While at these universities he became increasingly interested in socialism and Marxism. According to the intellectual historian Martin Jay, the topic of his dissertation was ‘the practical problems of implementing socialism.’

max horkheimer

Max Horkheimer

Carl Grünberg, [JEWISH] the Institute’s director from 1923-1929 was an avowed Marxist, although the Institute did not have any official party affiliations. But in 1930 Max Horkheimer [JEWISH] assumed control and he believed that Marx’s theory should be the basis of the Institute’s research. When Hitler came to power, the Institut was closed and its members, by various routes, fled to the United States and migrated to major US universities—Columbia, Princeton, Brandeis, and California at Berkeley.

The School included among its members the 1960s guru of the New Left Herbert Marcuse [JEWISH] (denounced by Pope Paul VI for his theory of liberation which ‘opens the way for licence cloaked as liberty’), Max Horkheimer [JEWISH], Theodor Adorno [JEWISH], the popular writer Erich Fromm [JEWISH], Leo Lowenthal [JEWISH], and Jurgen Habermas – possibly the School’s most influential representative.

Herbert Marcuse, one of the poisonous Jews who brought these evils to America.

Basically, the Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief – or even the hope of belief – that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke socialist revolution. Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to undermine the Judaeo-Christian legacy. To do this they called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the ‘oppressive’ order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virus—‘continuing the work of the Western Marxists by other means’ as one of their members noted.

To further the advance of their ‘quiet’ cultural revolution – but giving us no ideas about their plans for the future – the School recommended (among other things):

1. The creation of racism offences.
2. Continual change to create confusion
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking
7. Emptying of churches
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits
10. Control and dumbing down of media
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family

One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s [JEWISH] idea of ‘pansexualism’ – the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would:

• attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.
• abolish differences in the education of boys and girls
• abolish all forms of male dominance – hence the presence of women in the armed forces
• declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors’

Munzenberg summed up the Frankfurt School’s long-term operation thus:

‘We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.’

The School believed there were two types of revolution: (a) political and (b) cultural. Cultural revolution demolishes from within. ‘Modern forms of subjection are marked by mildness’. They saw it as a long-term project and kept their sights clearly focused on the family, education, media, sex and popular culture.

The Family

The School’s ‘Critical Theory’ preached that the ‘authoritarian personality’ is a product of the patriarchal family – an idea directly linked to Engels’ Origins of the Family, Private Property and the State, which promoted matriarchy. Already Karl Marx [JEWISH] had written, in the “Communist Manifesto”, about the radical notion of a ‘community of women’ and in The German Ideology of 1845, written disparagingly about the idea of the family as the basic unit of society. This was one of the basic tenets of the ‘Critical Theory’ : the necessity of breaking down the contemporary family. The Institute scholars preached that ‘Even a partial breakdown of parental authority in the family might tend to increase the readiness of a coming generation to accept social change.’

Following Karl Marx, the School stressed how the ‘authoritarian personality’ is a product of the patriarchal family—it was Marx who wrote so disparagingly about the idea of the family being the basic unit of society. All this prepared the way for the warfare against the masculine gender promoted by Marcuse under the guise of ‘women’s liberation’ and by the New Left movement in the 1960s.

They proposed transforming our culture into a female-dominated one. In 1933, Wilhelm Reich [JEWISH], one of their members, wrote in The Mass Psychology of Fascism that matriarchy was the only genuine family type of ‘natural society.’ Eric Fromm [JEWISH] was also an active advocate of matriarchal theory. Masculinity and femininity, he claimed, were not reflections of ‘essential’ sexual differences, as the Romantics had thought but were derived instead from differences in life functions, which were in part socially determined.’ His dogma was the precedent for the radical feminist pronouncements that, today, appear in nearly every major newspaper and television programme.

The revolutionaries knew exactly what they wanted to do and how to do it. They have succeeded.

READ THE REST HERE!

History of Politically Correct <INCLUDES SHORT VIDEOS ON THE FRANKFURT SCHOOL

Print Friendly
Download PDF
This entry was posted in History, Jew Commies, Jew Subversion and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

98 Responses to The Frankfurt School: Conspiracy to Corrupt

  1. Octo says:

    Thank you for your concern, Madame Anonymous. I know it’s a coincidence that all the Frankfurt School meme pushers were Jews, who were not looking to take over power centers, but merely warn us, in their semitic altruism.

    Thank You, again.

    “The Revolution won’t happen with guns, rather it will happen incrementally, year by year, generation by generation. We will gradually infiltrate their educational institutions and their political offices, transforming them slowly into Marxist entities as we move towards universal egalitarianism.”

    — Max Horkheimer, Marxist Jew of the Frankfurt School

  2. Marshall says:

    HERE’s one of those infiltrators Octo…can somebody tell me HOW in the WORLD this walking freakshow loser is teaching in a university?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noel_Ignatiev

  3. Biker says:

    HA! because he is a JEW Marsh LOL!

    we’ve said before here… you dont have to be funny, a good actor, have any real credentials or intelligence to become famous, published, or get elected… you just have to be JEWISH.

    Ignatiev is a first class asshole.

  4. Marshall says:

    Blows my mind Biker. To think of what Harvard costs, just to listen to a hobgoblin freak like this. Worked in a steel mill for 20 years, and POOF!!! gets a PhD at Harvard. Wonder who PAID for that, Biker? The taxpayer?

    Kind of reminds me of Rahm Emanuel going from ballet dancer to Chief of Staff, right?

    “Mr. Ignatiev was accepted to the Harvard Graduate School of Education without an undergraduate degree. After earning his master’s, he joined the Harvard faculty as a lecturer and worked toward a doctorate in U.S. history.”

    Just the kind of guy I want teaching me AMERICAN HISTORY BIKER!!!

    “Noel Ignatiev first became politically active in Students for a Democratic Society. When that organization split, Ignatiev became part of the Third-worldist and Maoist New Communist Movement, forming the group Sojourner Truth Organization in 1970.

    “His academic work is linked to his call to “abolish” the white race, a controversial slogan whose meaning is not always agreed upon by those who debate his work.”

    What part of “abolish” do they not agree upon Biker? It’s so vague…I just can’t catch his meaning LMAO!!!

    The kike writes a book called, “How the Irish Became White” like he’s some kind of expert on the subject? Now that Irish are white, have they earned the right to be “abolished” yet Mr. Ignatiev? Let’s get started and see who gets “abolished” first, “Noel”…Irish people or Commie Jews…hmm, tough call.

    Faugh a ballagh!!! :-D

  5. Biker says:

    id read some of Ignatiev’s writings regarding our ‘abolishment’, thats why i called him an asshole.

    he gets a PhD for free, and not even as a nigger with a ball, but as a racist that writes that we should be ‘abolished’. i wonder if i wrote a piece on abolishing jews, could i get a free ride at Yale? HA! yeah, i dont meet the most important requirement.. im not a JEW. besides THAT would be anti-semitic..

    how the Irish became WHITE?!?!?! what were they prior? GREEN ? LOL!

  6. KA Telegraph says:

    http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/politics/2830-pentagon-review-of-fort-hood-fails-to-mention-hasan-by-name

    Quote from a comment by Thomas Paine.

    “The reason the Military didn’t mention his name or his motive, is there are still honest people in the Military that won’t sell out to the NSA or NWO. They know something is rotten in “Denmark” so they won’t fuel the fire of this fake terrorist threat.”

  7. Octo says:

    Ignatiev, yeah. Held the Genocide chair at Harvard for a while. Quite a guy. Worked in a steel mill for twenty years my ass; I guarantee a handshake with that demonic looking fuck would show that his hands are smooth as a baby’s ass.

    http://incogman.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/ignatiev-noel.jpg

    Just another fictional “workers” pedigree. I have NEVER met a Jew beside me while I was working for a living. Materials, supply, admin, SUPERVISOR, commo, many different names for the same scam: use the workers; scheme behind the scenes.

    I knew a White man who went to Harvard, in the Humanities, no less. To say that he was unwelcome is a gross understatement. He called it “The Meme Factory,” because it produces the viruses that contaminate the rest of academia and our culture at large.

  8. kerdasi amaq says:

    I think he means that they went from being despised outsiders to be accepted as normal Americans(became white). Something niggers can never do.

  9. Octo says:

    Ignatiev means just what he says:

    “Race is a social contruct for everyone but the Jews, therefore all races must be abolished. But let’s start with Whites, since they are the worst offenders of racism, i.e., they are the only ones smart enough to figure this scam out.”

  10. incogman says:

    Got a link handy on that quote, Octo. Sounds like what a Jew might say.

  11. Octo says:

    @Incogman

    I was taking a hyperbolic liberty there. Figures, the one time I intentionally misquote someone and I’m called on it. But kerdasi amaq annoyed me with smug rationalization, as he or she often does.

    Ignatiev particularly gets on my nerves, and when ka started explaining and justifying his genocidal behavior away, I attributed to Ignatiev what he obviously lives by, and would say to a fellow Jew, but probably wouldn’t say as plainly as that to a mere goy.

    Then again, they’ve gotten so arrogant lately, there are many such things said. Harold Wallace Rosenthal says worse for paragraph after paragraph.

  12. incogman says:

    No, I’ve seen similar things that Jew has said. Just wanted to use it in full. No biggie.

  13. Octo says:

    This seems to be all the Talmudically slippery Ignatiev will actually commit to:

    “The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists. Of course we expected bewilderment from people who still think of race as biology. We frequently get letters accusing us of being “racists,” just like the KKK, and have even been called a “hate group…

    Race Traitor will not abandon its focus on whiteness, no matter how vehement the pleas and how virtuously oppressed those doing the pleading. The editors meant it when they replied to a reader, “Make no mistake about it: we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed—not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed.”

    Ignatiev is not a traitor to his race.

    http://harvardmagazine.com/2002/09/abolish-the-white-race.html

    Promoting genocide of whites? Noel Ignatiev and the culture of Western suicide

    Kevin MacDonald

    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/articles/MacDonald-Ignatiev.html

  14. Octo says:

    Note the way Ignatiev scares the timid away by stating “abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable” that only “committed white supremacists” oppose their own destruction. Doesn’t get any jewier than that. Reminds me of Saul Alinsky, just another Talmudist.

    http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/alinsky.htm

    Just a few years ago, that was enough to scare off more than 90% of whites (with a lower case “w”), but I’m not so sure now.

    More whites must be emerging as White, just by the inevitable realization that every white, White, and non-jew of any stripe is by definition — Jewish definition: the only one that counts — an anti-semite, and is therefore earmarked for enslavement or extermination.

    A friend emailed me that the apparently low crime rate in NYC has him baffled, or is it fudged numbers?

    I posited it could be true, because just right now, people, white, brown, black and yellow, are wondering where they’re going to live, how they’re going to live, next year — hell, next month? But the overlords don’t allow any static situations. This is going to change; this is going to erupt. Calm before the storm.

  15. Flanders says:

    I’m getting in late on this discussion since the post predated me, but I’ll drop some links which I don’t think have been given from a cursory review of the comments.

    Quotes:
    http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_tavistock02.htm

    Tavistock Instituitions in the US
    http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_committee300_10.htm#PAST%20AND%20PRESENT%20MEMBERS%20OF%20THE%20COMMITTEE%20OF%20300

    INSTITUTlONS THROUGH WHICH CONTROL IS EXERCISED
    http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_committee300_03.htm#INSTITUTlONS%20THROUGH%20WHICH%20CONTROL%20IS%20EXERCISED

    Committee of 300
    http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_committee300_09.htm#PAST%20AND%20PRESENT%20INSTITUTIONS/ORGANIZATIONS%20AND

    I’ll do more in a followup to try to avoid the trap.

  16. Flanders says:

    More links.

    An example of what I consider Tavistock/Frankfort School tactics against individuals exposing them, and some accounts that are not “directly connected” to Tav/Fra. I suspect anything related to satanism or to “extra-ordinary moral events” as being connected with them or with associated institutions.

    Held In A Psychiatric Ward & Called “Delusional” For Saying 9/11 Was An Inside Job
    http://clareswinney.wordpress.com/incarcerated-in-a-psychiatric-ward-because-i-said-911-was-an-inside-job/

    Effectiveness of the “Big Lie”.
    http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2009/08/scientists-confirm-effectiveness-of-big.html

    Snuff porn in Brisbane Australia.. the Mossad link
    http://2012forum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=13969

  17. Bella says:

    I feel really good about being white…it is what I am.

  18. Octo says:

    How are things in Canada, Dear?

  19. Flanders says:

    White is great, Bella. The whole world wants to be White.

    They will never get there, just as the jews who pretend to be white at the Race Traitor site which Octo commented on will never be white – no matter how much they pose and pretend.
    ———–

    Jewish Sabbateans Rule the World for Satan
    http://jewsribsinbearjaw.wordpress.com/2009/07/11/jewish-sabbateans-rule-the-world-for-satan/

    If there is anything which explains what may be a common source for all matters relating to Tavistock/Fra it is this article. I suspect that all of the occultist masonics and most of the jews, including the “non-practicing”, are all practicing the religion of thier godfather.

  20. kerdasi amaq says:

    Defending Ignatiev? Moi, never. What I wrote was a response to Biker’s comment and it is the basic thesis of Ignatiev’s book: as I see it. I have read that book and I didn’t like it.

  21. Octo says:

    “The whole world wants to be White. ”

    That’s really what all the hatred towards us is about, and that’s all it’s ever been about.

  22. Biker says:

    racial envy, they want to be us, but CANT.

  23. Octo says:

    Of course, the Jews make the same claim. Everyone’s jealous of them.

    Who the fuck wants to be Jewish? Maybe you want to be powerful, maybe you want to be rich, but no literally no one I have ever known has wanted to be Jewish — even though they are the most successful ethnic group in the world.

    As reversed as White status has become, how many Jews, blacks, etc. wouldn’t jump at the chance to magically wake up White tomorrow, even penniless, but still White?

    You can always make more money, but you’ll be just a Jew or nigger forever.

  24. Biker says:

    but instead they wake up as Lenny Kravitz, or Obama.. i wouldnt want that for ANY amount of money!!

    maybe its just not in our nature as whites? i CANT, really can not knowingly screw someone out of money. id make a terrible used car salesman lol! i also would fucking hang myself if i had to live as Haitians or Liberians.. or even ghetto niggers here in the US. all the rap music, gold teeth and bling cant hide the fact that YOU are a dirty nigger that lives like an animal. id exit that life, post haste..

  25. Steelback says:

    Kevin MacDonald’s demolition of Frankfurt in The Culture of Critique,especially the specious science behind their Authoritarian Personality study,is masterful.

    The project to make us feel ashamed of our own culture seems to have been emboldened by what supposedly transpired during the Holocaust.Adorno fatuously declared that nobody should write poetry any more-not after the Holocaust.This typically Jewcentric take on art and the humanities is what lies behind the Dialectic of the Enlightenment.Bourgeois liberalism’s natural endpoint is the Holocaust.The Enlightenment was bound inevitably to regress and turn full circle.It was an iron law in the mould of Marx’s scientific socialism.The statement is still made by academics today as if it can never be gainsaid.

    The host culture is condemned to hang its head in shame forever after the Holocaust and consent to its own demographic and cultural eclipse without a murmur.

    MacDonald also shows how Frankfurt ideas didn’t die at the end of the sixties but actually exercised a profound influence on the academic chic that was taught as Deconstruction and Postmodernism.These techniques for reading literature and culture were taught as the unchallengeable orthodoxy or Holy Grail.

    The absurdly abstruse prose style used by writers like Derrida,and his translator,Gayatry Spivak,like Adorno before them was prescribed as the challenge to which students must aspire.If you couldn’t read these guys you weren’t up to the course!The more opaque they larded it the more truth it must contain.Derrida became the nearest thing to a religion!

    MacDonald dissects the pretentious claptrap in which these theorists engaged and discovers the same Jewcentric agenda of elevating Judaism in relation to the “totalizing” and “universalizing” tendencies of Western thought systems.The embrace of the ethnic Other and minority ethnic group culture was beholden on the host society as was the casting aside of one’s own.

    The strategy of pathologizing forms of Gentile behaviour such as membership in cohesive groups and families allows Jews to hide the clannish instincts critical to the maintenance of Judaism on which they themselves have relied for centuries.Gentiles fail to notice their cultural and political eclipse because they fail to understand such group strategies are crucial to cultural maintenance and order.

    Frankfurt conditioning today still prevents otherwise thinking people,especially on the left,from talking about Jews,particularly in the organized forms of behaviour they demonstrate in the fields they dominate.Thus the Lobby and Israel usually escape all censure.Mention that the Jews likely had a hand in 911 and you’re finished!

    Our only option now is to acquiesce in our own downfall.

    Amen!

  26. Octo says:

    “The absurdly abstruse prose style used by writers like Derrida,and his translator,Gayatry Spivak,like Adorno before them was prescribed as the challenge to which students must aspire.If you couldn’t read these guys you weren’t up to the course!The more opaque they larded it the more truth it must contain.Derrida became the nearest thing to a religion!”

    How about James Joyce? Samuel Beckett?

    I know they didn’t create deconstructionism, nor were they awarded honorary degrees from The New School of Social Research: which was LITERALLY the Frankfurt School East, but they were pretty dense and opaque.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_School_for_Social_Research

  27. Steelback says:

    While MacDonald homes in on Derrida’s Circoconfession as evidence of the peculiarly Jewish cutural project on which he was engaged another possibly more revealing aspect of Derrida’s ouvre is Kabbalah.

    Key Derridian concepts and interests that derive from Kabbalah are touched upon here:

    http://www.newkabbalah.com/newkabbalah.html

    So Deconstruction was not just mumbo-jumbo it was Jewish mumbo-jumbo.Needless to say those academics for whom Derrida was prescribed reading for their enthusiastic but utterly perplexed (what the BeJeez are we doing this for?) students never mentioned these peculiarly Jewish aspects of Derrida.

    Sarkozy’s prescription for racial mixing as means to engineer Jewish elite supremacy may be an extension of the lobotomization of the French that began with their Revolution.

    Read How the French Were Lobotomized on Kaminski’s website.

  28. Octo says:

    Adorno’s comical Authoritarian Personality study is the direct ancestor of every personality, “honesty” and “loyalty” inventory given today.

    Who better to judge criteria for stability, honesty and loyalty than Jews?

    All of those tests are primarily designed to red light White males with residual elements of tribalism and self-determinism from entering positions in JOG.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>