Excerpt in Memory of Eustace Mullins

By Eustace Mullins

Eustace Mullins 1923-2010

CHAPTER ONE: THE PARASITE

Most of us think of a parasite as something distasteful, whose role in life is to feed at the expense of someone else. As a result, the term, when applied to humans, is always one of disgust. In the animal and plant kingdoms, also, the parasite is universally disliked. The Oxford English Dictionary (1933) defines the term.

“Parasite–

1. One who eats at the table, or at the expense of, another; always an opprobrious application.

2. Biol. An animal or plant which lives in or upon another organism (technically called its host) and draws its nutriment directly from it.

3. (fig.) a person whose part or action resembles that of an animal parasite.”

Thus we find that a parasite is one who is disliked, who feeds at the expense of another, and who lives in or upon another organism which is called the host. We also find that the term can be applied to a person whose life follows the classic life pattern of the parasite.

Now, in the study of mankind, we find that there is one group or classification of persons who appear persistently in the records of the great civilizations. They are always disliked, yet they remain in the midst of the people who dislike them, and if they are driven out, they insist upon returning, no matter at what cost to themselves. We also find that they always manage to live at the expense of others.

The Encyclopaedia Britannica defines parasitism as follows:

“Parasitism – a one-sided nutritive relationship between two organisms of different kinds, a relationship which is more or less injurious, yet not usually fatal, to the host; a relationship, moreover, that relieves the parasite from most of the activity or struggle which is usually associated with procuring food, and thus tends to favour or induce some degree of simplification or degeneracy.”

In the record of many civilizations, we find that the presence of the parasitic group is in many instances fatal to the host people, because it affects fundamental changes in the life pattern of the host people, and diverts their primary energies to the feeding of the parasites. This alteration affects every aspect of the host people’s existence, and inevitably weakens them to the point where they are destroyed. Since the Encyclopaedia Britannica refers above to a purely biological parasitic condition in the animal and the plant kingdoms, it is true that the parasitic relationship can be injurious without being fatal, over a period of time, yet even in these instances, we find many examples of plants and animals being killed by parasites, a fact which apparently was not known to the learned scholar who authored the authoritative Encyclopaedia Britannica article on this condition.

We find, too, that the parasitic group is continually denounced by the more moral elements among the host people, because the parasitic group indulges in every known type of degeneracy. The reasons for this are obvious. As the Encyclopaedia Britannica article points out, a parasitic existence leads to degeneracy. Since the parasite does not have to trouble himself with the active procurement of food, he has plenty of time and energy to devote himself to the vilest pursuits, and to the debauching of members of the host people.

The Encyclopaedia Britannica also paragraphs an important factor in the present study, the localization of the parasite within the host. The Britannica article points out that,

“Parasites are often localized to a particular site within the host.”

Since the parasite has reduced its life aims to one goal, that of remaining upon the host and feeding at its expense, it must choose a location where this is possible. The location must be one from which the host cannot readily dislodge it, and it must be one which allows the parasite to feed without exertion. As a result, the parasite usually chooses a place in or near the reproductive organs or the excretory organs of the host.

Throughout history, the parasitic group has chosen to localize itself near the reproductive or the excretory organs of the host. In most cases, this has meant settling in the great cities of the host people, although, in nations which were primarily agricultural, the parasitic group managed to disperse itself among the villages.

Webster’s Third International Dictionary defines the parasite as “2a – an organism living in or on another living organism, obtaining from it part or all of its organic nutriment, and commonly exhibiting some degree of structural modifications.

THE ABILITY TO MODIFY

This is an important characteristic of the parasitic group in the history of mankind. It has exhibited an amazing ability to change or to modify itself in order to achieve its parasitic goal. It has developed extremely refined techniques for remaining upon the host, and sophisticated methods of continuing to feed at the host’s expense. It has adopted many guises, and it has shown a tremendous amount of adaptability for appearing in various forms, in order to remain in place.

To continue with Webster’s Third International Dictionary –

“Parasite 3. something that resembles the biological parasite in dependence upon something else for existence without making a useful or adequate return (illus. the great city is a parasite on the country – Francois Bondy).”

This is the last important key to the solution of our problem, the decay of human civilization. The parasite depends on something else for existence without making a useful or an adequate return. Throughout our study of history, we find that the parasitic group never makes any return or shows any gratitude for being allowed to feed upon the host. The parasites motto is “always take.” Should we be surprised, then to find that this motto actually appears in the written literature of a known parasitic group?

We now ask the reader – what group appears and reappears in the history of one civilization after another? What group has always been actively disliked by its host peoples? What group has played an often decisive role in the decay and collapse of one civilization after another? What group indulges in every type of degeneracy? What group always localizes to certain positions among the host peoples? And what group refuses to fulfill a constructive role in any civilization, but instead, remains true to its motto of “Always take,” while refusing to make a useful or an adequate return?

KNOWN AS THE JEWS

This group, as the reader may have already surmised from his own studies, is known throughout history as the Jews. Prior to the present study, human individuals or groups living at the expense of others were often called parasites, but this term was used purely in a sociological sense, without any biological point of reference. Plantation owners were said to be parasites because they lived at the expense of their slaves, aristocrats were said to be parasites because they lived at the expense of the masses, armies were said to be parasites because they lived at the expense of the workers.

But, in every case, the supposed parasites were performing certain duties and fulfilling certain responsibilities in the society. Thus we find that in the purely sociological sense, it is possible to name many groups as parasitical, such as children and those who are too old to work. They are certainly feeding at the expense of others, performing no useful work, and making no adequate return. But these groups either have done useful work in the past, or they are expected to do so in the future. Thus, they do not fall within the accepted framework of the biological definition of a parasite. Throughout this work, we will find that the biological references hold true to an amazing degree, in establishing the history and the presence of a parasitical group, and that in every instance, the records of the Jews prove that they are fulfilling the role of biological parasites.

Excerpt from The Biological Jew, by Eustace Mullins. Read the rest HERE

The Jew lives in constant fear of rejection, of being thrown off of the host, which would mean his starvation and death. As a result, the Jew sees everything in the light of how he “relates” to the host, or how he maintains his parasitic situation.

— Eustace Mullins, The Biological Jew.

“A healthy body will destroy harmful germs. Only a fool would willingly sabotage the natural function of his body and call it ‘anti-germism.’ A wise person will do everything he can to support the fight against dangerous parasites.”

— W. F. Hermans, Dutch writer.

                                  

* Mullins just passed away. Once mentored by the famous poet Ezra Pound, Mullins soon became a great writer and truth-teller for Whites and America. Jews hated him. If you go to Kikepidia, you’ll see how they try to paint the guy as a mere conspiricy kook. Just read between the lines. Read this: The Ghost of Ezra Pound

Note: I had already planned to run this post sometime this week under another title when I heard he died. [INCOG]

John Kaminski on Eustace Mullins

Eustace Mullins — The Neo-Zionist Order. A 10 part interview with Eustace Mullins on Israel, world Zionism, the Federal Reserve and more. If you question the parasite analogy business, then definitely go watch Part 2 on Youtube at least. NOTE: These videos may get deleted once again by embedded ADL Jewish Censors at Youtube (for real).

About INCOG MAN

100% White boy born and bred in the USA. Dedicated to awakening Whites to all the crap being done to our decent, fair-minded race and exposing the devious brainwashing rats behind it all. Wake the ef up, White people!
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

132 Responses to Excerpt in Memory of Eustace Mullins

  1. Octo says:

    Hounded to the grave and beyond

    Hometown neighbors shun the memory of legendary writer

    ‘Mullins’ caretaker Jesse Lee noted that the local newspaper ran a prepackaged 3-page smear job of Mullins shortly after his death was announced, and that numerous local have made it clear to him that any public display of respect for Mullins would not be permitted by town officials. Of course, this was the tenor of Mullins’ life: tailed by J. Edgar Hoover, avoiding kidnap attempts by mysterious figures, and watching his parents die of apoplexy because of what the FBI did to them.

    http://www.johnkaminski.info/pages/the_next_chapter/hounded_to_the_grave_and_beyond.htm

  2. SBD TV says:

    If government officials act outside the law like common criminals then they can be treated as such!

    [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2TEhMyRmZg&hl=en_US&fs=1&]
    ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….16,143

  3. Hi,

    Is it hot in here or is it me…? 😀

    Anyways, hats off to the host of this blog for stimulating a good conversation. And to my fellow film lover, try this site to download your favorite films. for FREE…

    http://how-to-save-youtube-video.blogspot.com/

    All the best,

    James

  4. Marshall says:

    Thanks for the link there James. I myself have just been using Realplayer for several years with no problems. When I’m watching a Youtube or any other video, I just run my mouse to the top right corner, and a little download tab pops up. Click on download and it saves the video to whatever folder I want. It runs in the background and records “on the fly” while I’m watching. Free too at http://www.real.com, and welcome to Incogland!!!

  5. SBD TV says:

    [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ik30ijaBgUA&hl=en_US&fs=1&]
    ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………54,315

  6. L says:

    The NAZI’s lost already. Get over it…

  7. John Gills says:

    If a group doesn’t fit a bad stereotype, then they are killed off because they upset or debunk the perpetuation of the bad stereotype that breeds the hatred. The Nazi Hans Frank of Nazi occupied Poland (General Government) during WWII made an observation as follows:

    “We will get these Jews marching and cause them – as they have already covered the distance from Jerusalem to Poland – to move eastward a few thousand kilometers. But these Jews are not that parasite gang alone, from our point of view, but strangely enough – we only realized it over there [in Poland] – there is another category of Jews, something one would never have thought possible.

    There are laboring Jews over there who work in transport, in building, in factories, and others are skilled workers such as tailors, shoemakers, etc. We have put together Jewish workshops with the help of these skilled Jewish workers, in which goods will be made which will greatly ease the position of German production, in exchange for the supply of foodstuffs and whatever else the Jews need urgently for their existence.

    These Jews may well be left to work in this way; in the way in which we are now using them it is something of an achievement for the work-Jews themselves; but for the other Jews we must provide suitable arrangements. It is always dangerous, after all, to leave one’s native land. Since the Jews moved away from Jerusalem there has been nothing for them except an existence as parasites: that has now come to an end.

    If one looks at the Warsaw ghetto today in which 480,000 Jews – well, let us say – live, then one must realize that only the determination of the National-Socialist revolution was capable of successfully confronting even this problem. In 1919, at our first meetings in Munich, we proclaimed the motto: An end must be put to the rule of the Jews in Europe….”

    In the Nazi movie Der Ewige Jude (The Eternal Jew), there is a scene were many rich and powerful Jews are named but not even one was ever harmed by the Nazis. On the other hand, the poor working Jews were.
    Did they pay the price (scapegoats) for their rich, powerful brothers?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.