Sarah Palin: Trojan Horse for the Zionists


Zionists Devour Tea Party with Palin Trojan Horse

By Brother Nathanael Kapner*

THE ZIONIST BEAST THAT NOW RULES AMERICA has usurped and consumed — like a drive-thru lunch at McDonalds — the latest populist flicker on the otherwise fascist political landscape…the ‘Tea Party Movement.’

Cleverly, deftly, the Zionists – as they always do – identified their target, sized up its strength and cohesion, and moved in for the kill on the middle-aged political (and otherwise) haunches of 2012 Presidential candidate-to-be, Sarah Palin.

Ms. Palin, who apparently (mercifully) turned down, some time back, a purported multi-million dollar nude photo shoot to continue running with the Zionist satanic gangster elite…sensing a far bigger payday down the road. (If the woman was homely and ugly, there would be no ‘Sarah Palin.’)

The shrewd, leveraged use of avowed Zionist and Israel-lover Palin to co-opt the Tea Party should come as no surprise to anyone.

For those who still practice the dying art of ‘memory,’ you’ll recall that shortly after she was installed as (designated loser) McCain’s Vice Presidential candidate, some felt that, as an outsider, Palin might actually be someone in the American political zoo who was not on bended knee to the de facto US Government in Tel Aviv.

As we all saw in short order, it didn’t take the Alaskan huntress long to show up in what might as well have been skull cap pasties declaring her undying loyalty (Read: ‘abject subservience’) to Zionist Israel and, by extension, the ultimate Jewish ‘God’s Eye’…the Rothschilds of the City of London.

Devouring The Tea Party

THE ‘KINDA CUTE’ TEA PARTY MOVEMENT began as a loose affiliation of a smattering of noisy American individuals and groups united in their opposition to Obama’s socialist/communist/open immigration agenda.

For some reason (hmm), the Zionist press gave this quaint, growing amalgam of fairly numerous, small, regional Tea Party-associated coffee klatches some media play. Make no mistake, most of the Party members were and are sincere grassroots noisemakers.

Over the weeks, these often disparate little power centers eventually morphed into the “Tea Party Nation,” and (hmm) invited Ex-Gov Palin to be the keynote speaker at their “First National Tea Party Convention”, (as they billed it), in Nashville Tennessee February 4-6, 2010.

For anyone even passively capable of remembering VP Candidate Sarah’s putrid declarations of fealty to Zion and Israel, the invitation to, and acceptance by, the one-time VP candidate should have stamped ‘Case Closed’ for the Tea Party movement then and there.

But who does real research anymore? A simple 10 minute examination of the Tea Party Nation’s actual background power brokers reveals heavy Jewish lobby interests deeply penetrated into the Tea Party organism. End of story. R.I.P.

IT’S A SIMPLE FACT OF POLITICAL LIFE in America that NO viable, honest political movement shall be permitted to take ten healthy breaths before being probed thoroughly and then taken over by the Zionist political machine…which makes Dr. Frankenstein’s lab success look like Mother Theresa.

Zionism – like a political Hydra – has tentacles firmly and terminally thrust into every major power center in America. We can now add to that sorry roster, the Tea Party ‘phenomenon.’

In fact, it would not surprise this writer, if the Tea Party blip on the radar was CREATED by Zionists for a little weekend fun to siphon off and control the palpable, if not truly formidable, discontent growing among the remaining semi-conscious sheeple grazing from sea to shining sea.

In the alternate, however, if the Tea Party movement was/is a genuine spasm of political anger – with even a remote chance of causing trouble to the status (Star of David) quo – it was immediately targeted for total control and usurpation by the Zionist masters when it began to force the Jewish media to cover it. (Hence the suggestion that the Tea Party populist ‘opposition’ may have been born of Zionism chicanery and manipulation in the first place.)

Savor this: Listed on the Tea Party Nation’s own Internet Home Site as one of its leading “Resources,” is the malignant Zionist, Jewish Neocon think tank, “The American Enterprise Institute,” which pushed the US into the illegal War Of Genocide in Iraq (two million Iraqi dead) and is currently propagandizing and demanding the (US) annihilation of Iran…to protect ‘brave little Israel’ – our only ‘democratic friend’ in the Middle East.

Next up in the chain of evidence of Zionist control of the Tea Party Nation, one finds as its leading sponsor and “featured Convention speaker,” Mr. Joseph Farah, publisher of World Net Daily, a RABID Pro-Israel Internet news and propaganda service.

AN UNABASHED lover of the racist, murderous, outlaw Zionist state of Israel and arch defender of its ongoing genocide of what remains of Palestine and its people, Mr. Farah joined ’sweet’ Sarah on the national convention podium.

Palin, of course, has made it quite clear that ‘yesterday’ wouldn’t be too soon to obliterate 80 million Iranians (to feed the blood lust of Zion). Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News was also represented on the Tea Party rostrum in a joint speech with Mr. Farah – more below. Zionist money-hunter, Rep Michelle Bachman, was also on the scheduled speaker list.

Since resigning as Alaska’s governor last July and winning near goddess-like approval from the Jewish neocons’ foremost US-based character assassin and henchman, William Kristol, who called her resignation a“shrewd move,” Palin came out swinging (the melodrama begins) against Obama in her keynote address and singing out the Tea Party’s 3 core values: -1- Fiscal Responsibility -2- Constitutionally Limited Government -3- Free Markets (a grand Zionist advantage).

In their enrapt, near-orgasmic throes of enthusiasm (the facts are that this is an overt and subliminal SEX issue), for Sarah’s old-time keynote rant, genuine Tea Party zealots failed to realize that Palin is owned lock, stock, and barrel by the Zionist Power Bloc.

With Palin-enablers like Zionist Jews Rupert Murdoch, Jacob Rothschild, William Kristol, and Randy Scheunemann, the Tea Party patriots who tried to roll out a genuine populist renewal of ‘Americanism’ will, instead, be getting yet another onslaught of Zionist skullduggery and hardcore Jewish tribalism housed behind the square-rimmed designer glasses, People Mag fodder, politically ‘fresh’ malignantly Zionist ‘Christian’ soccer mom.

BIG Jewish Money And Advisers Behind Palin

IN SEEKING REVENGE FOR OBAMA’S ATTACKS on Faux News last year, Rupert Murdoch, owner of News Corporation, parent company of Fox Enterprises, has found an all-too willing accomplice (let’s genocide Iran) in patsy Palin.

If the ‘celebrity’ ex-Governor hopes to be America’s next teleprompter reader-in-chief, Sarah must now tout Rupert’s Zionist line which she will find as difficult to do as slipping on a pair of L’eggs panty hose, or pulling the trigger on a telescopically-sighted, and already dead elk or whatever other fur-covered mammal she decides to ‘drop’ for ’sport.’ (Imagine the painted lips and the curled toes if this woman was allowed to give the order to ‘drop’ Iran.)

Murdoch, a full-fledged drooling Zionist, whose mother, Elizabeth Joy Greene, was the daughter of a wealthy Jewish family, (usually an oxymoron), brought his abiding interest and media spotlight to bear in full on Palin in mid-January 2010.

Fox News AND the Wall Street Journal, both owned by Murdoch’s News Corporation, featured Palin’s speech in a multiplicity of articles complete with a “splashy” WSJ Interactive Graphic Presentation on Palin. Most of America, of course, would have been happier with a photocopy of a TSA backscatter x-ray of the ex-Governor.

Just two weeks before her speech at the Tea Party ‘Convention’… Murdoch tabbed Palin as a Fox News “on-air contributor.”

If this was not enough, Rupert Murdoch bought, built, and installed, a TV studio in Palin’s home in Wasilla, Alaska, this past week so she could ‘contribute’ without the strain of transit to a local broadcast facility.

So, in sum, there is no argument, no question whatsoever, that big Zionist Murdoch money and influence now own Palin’s immediate and, perhaps, long-term future.

Sarah’s Zionist Jewish backers not only include rapacious Rupert and his News Corporation and well connected NY Jew, Arthur M. Siskind (Senior adviser to Murdoch), but none other than…drum roll…Jacob Rothschild, as well.

Follow this one: On the Board of Directors of Murdoch’s News Corporation, is one Andrew Knight, Chairman of J. Rothschild Capital Management Limited. (JRCML is a subsidiary of RIT Capital Partners whose Executive Director is “Lord” Jacob Rothschild.)

Murdoch has already appointed a start-up contingent of Zionist-Jewish advisers to guide, train, polish and manipulate Palin as she rolls down the tracks on the Zionist Express.

Advisers such as neocon Jews William Kristol, Dan Blumenthal (resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute), Randy Schuenemann (former foreign policy adviser to McCain) and Sam Schulman, (resident publicist for the American Enterprise Institute), are guaranteed to garner support for Palin from the well-heeled Jewish lobbies that rule America’s political life. View Palin’s Jewish Advisers HERE, HERE, HERE, & HERE.

Palin Plays To The Jewish Lobby

“ISRAEL IS AMERICA’S CRITICAL ALLY,” declared ’sweet’ Sarah Palin from the podium to loud and dutiful applause at the Tea Party Nation’s convention last week. Yes, friends, there is only one ‘critical ally’ of the United States of America…and the Zionist state of Israel is it.

Sporting a pin on her lapel with two flags — for Israel and the United States — Palin spewed a carefully orchestrated script designed to please and make glow the Jewish lobbyists monitoring her every word. Palin gave them just what they wanted to hear: “It’s time for tough action against the dangerous regime of Iran.” (Translation: “Let’s nuke the Persian creeps and let ‘God’ sort them out.” Although I highly doubt Palin knows the difference between Persian and Arab).

Already vetted by AIPAC even before McCain ‘chose’ her as his running mate in July 2008, Palin made sure that her AIPAC pedigree is 100% secure when she told the Tea Party Convention audience, “Our President spent a year reaching out to hostile regimes and dangerous dictators. Now Israel, a proven friend, questions the strength of our support.”

Palin, knowing which side of the toast the yellow stuff goes on, then delivered a shoe-in for MILLIONS in Jewish campaign money in an interview with her media owner…er, sponsor, Fox News, only one day after her Tea Party speech:

Fox News: “Can Obama be defeated in 2012?”

Sarah Palin: “Say Obama played the war card. Say he decided to declare war on Iran. Say he decided to really come out and do whatever he could to support Israel, which I would like him to do. That would change the dynamics.”
View Entire Story HERE & HERE.

If it’s WAR that Palin wants, then she will have no trouble getting the WAR-MONGERING Jewish lobbies and their partners in the Jewish-owned media to scream for bloody, genocidal war with her.

One wonders if the bona fide, authentic, Tea Party patriot faithful actually know what has happened to their dreams and hopes. The coup is over…it’s game, set and match to the Zionists…the Tea Party is now just another kosher media circus.

SOURCE

*Kapner is a former Jew who turned orthodox Christian. The man tells it like it is! [INCOG]

About INCOG MAN

100% White boy born and bred in the USA. Dedicated to awakening Whites to all the crap being done to our decent, fair-minded race and exposing the devious brainwashing rats behind it all. Wake the ef up, White people!
This entry was posted in Politics, Zionists and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

367 Responses to Sarah Palin: Trojan Horse for the Zionists

  1. ????? says:

    If Incogman doesn’t immediately ban himself and every single commentator from this site, I swear I’m going to eat some chicken wings and drink a beer!

    I’ll do it. Don’t push me, man. I’ll do it!

  2. ????? says:

    If Incogman doesn’t immediately ban himself and every single commentator from this site, I swear I’m going to eat some chicken wings and drink a beer!

    I’ll do it. Don’t push me, man. I’ll do it!

  3. ????? says:

    If Incogman doesn’t immediately ban himself and every single commentator from this site, I swear I’m going to eat some chicken wings and drink a beer!

    I’ll do it. Don’t push me, man. I’ll do it!

  4. RocketMan says:

    i don’t think the hoff calling for us to kick the jew in the face 10 times is the same hoff we all know and respect.
    there is hoff and hoffbarat, hoff’s writing is far better than the redneck rants we’ve been seeing here.

  5. Anonymous says:

    A little respect for others would help here. Constant name calling is childish. I’ve seen it done in a lot of comments here.

  6. Anonymous says:

    No respect here. The gerbel wheel spins out of control. A dozen or so comment, while the site gets 4000 hits daily. The topic of this site is clear. The infighting is the side show.

  7. ????? says:

    An overlooked Obama-Jew Connection, via the Jew gangster Annenberg:

    http://brianakira.wordpress.com/2008/10/12/what-is-factcheckorg/

    This Jew FactCheck site (like Snopes) was set up in order to “debunk” anyone who exposes the Jews and their Shabbos Goyim.

    + + +

    At Snopes.com, the Jewess Barbara Mikkelson and her husband, the Jew David Mikkelson, purport to debunk or confirm what they call “urban legends”.

    This Jewish operation has been widely pumped up by the Jews at National Review and similar Zio-Con sites. It’s also been given the kosher seal of approval by the Jews at FactCheck. Of course, neither National Review nor FactCheck mentioned the Jewey nature of Snopes, just like they won’t discuss their own status as outlets for Jew propaganda. They’ll all prattle on and on about “left” “right” “left” right” “left” “right” (marching to the Jews’ prison farm for the goyim) bias, but they’ll not discuss Jewist bias.

    For most Jews, there is no “left wing” or “right wing”. There’s just the Jew wing.

    FactCheck and Snopes is like FactCheck’s poor cousin. Fact Check is set up by a Mega-Zionist millionaire, with a large staff, and associated with numerous academic and “charitable” foundations. Snopes is just two small-time Jews on the make. But they serve the same puropse. Even though FactCheck is politicized and connected through and through, it’s widely cited as the last word on political scandals. And even though Snopes.com is just another blog, just another small-time hobby website run out of some Jew’s basement, they’re widely cited as “the last word” on contentious issues.

    This is the Jew way: The best way for them to settle a debate is to end the debate.

    That way the Jew yet again gets to determine “reality” for the goyim.

    As an example of how this works, here’s the Jewish Snopes.com on Mel Gibson:

    QUOTE

    Home > Politics > Religion > The Passion

    Claim: Actor Mel Gibson’s father has dismissed historical accounts of the Holocaust as impossible and denied that the September 11 terrorist attacks were perpetrated by Al Qaida hijackers.

    Status: True.

    Example: [Citing a mass-circulation email from 2003]:

    “In the New York Times Magazine of Sunday, March 9, 2003 it is reported that Mel Gibson is making a film of the last 6 hours of the life of Jesus Christ in which he purports to tell the “truth”, namely that the Jews are responsible for his death!

    “This canard has been discredited by all people of good will including the Pope. Yet Gibson, who is a member of an extreme Catholic sect called “Holy Family” which has distanced itself from the main body of catholicism and is not affiliated with the Roman Catholic Diocese is using his money and his high profile to finance and film this retrogressive and defamatory story.

    “Gibson, whose father, Hutton Gibson is a notorious Holocaust denier and who claims the the World Trade Center was destroyed by remote control and not by al Queda; that the Second Vatican Council was a Masonic plot backed by the Jews and that all popes going back to John XXIII have been illegitimate “anti-popes”.

    “The article goes on much longer and is not refuted by either party. I believe in free speech, but not when it fosters hatred and gives our enemies ammunition to perpetuate the greatest crime of the century and the continued persecution of Jews.

    “Four 4000 years we have been blamed for every wrong in the world. We will not tolerate this additional insult.

    “I urge you to read the article and also forward this message to all people who you feel should know about this. I, for one will no longer pay my money to see Gibson’s films, which support his continued racism.”

    Origins:

    The excerpts quoted above which are represented as appearing in the 9 March 2003 edition of the New York Times Magazine are accurate; they were drawn from a piece about actor Mel Gibson, his religion, and his father entitled “Is the Pope Catholic … Enough?” However, rather than being a straightforward summary of that article, the e-mailed version includes some rather selective quotes and lopsided commentary.

    Mel Gibson is a Catholic traditionalist who has used some of the monies he has earned as an actor to fund construction of a church in the Agoura Hills, California, area. His Holy Family Catholic Church includes one of 600 traditionalist chapels in operation today (where, unlike most modern Catholic churches, Sunday Mass is still conducted entirely in Latin) and is not recognized by the Holy See. Catholic traditionalists view modern church reforms as the work of either foolish liberals or hellbent heretics, preferring for themselves a version of Catholicism as it was practiced prior to the reforms enacted by the Second Vatican Council (commonly known as Vatican II) between 1963 and 1965.

    Mel Gibson’s 84-year-old father, Hutton Gibson, may be considered an eccentric, a crackpot, or an anti-Semite (or some combination thereof) depending upon how charitably one views his utterances and beliefs about religion and politics, but Mel himself has neither explicitly affirmed nor denied the opinions voiced by his father, responding to questions about them by ambiguously asserting that “My father has never told me a lie.” One paragraph from the original New York Times article not mentioned in the e-mail cited above addresses how much commonality of viewpoint there may be between father and son:

    “Whether any of this has rubbed off on Hutton’s son Mel is an open question. A church elder at Holy Family says that while the two share the same foundation of faith, Mel Gibson parts company with his father on many points. “He doesn’t go along with a lot of what his dad says,” he says. And beyond claiming to have seen the plans for Holy Family and attended services with the congregation, Hutton Gibson [who lives in Houston] has no apparent connection to his son’s church in California.”

    Given the younger Gibson’s anti-semitic outburst when he was arrested for driving under the influence in Malibu, California, on 28 July 2006, the general public is much less inclined nowadays to give him the benefit of the doubt regarding how much his world view truly diverges from that of his father.

    Last updated: 9 September 2006

    Sources:

    Friedman, Roger. “Church Digs Mel Gibson’s $5 Million.” FOXNews.com. 13 February 2006.

    Noxon, Christopher. “Is the Pope Catholic … Enough?” The New York Times. 9 March 2003 (Magazine; p. 60).

    UNQUOTE

    Notice the phony objectivity and the faux-academic manner at the end. The citations from two “ideologically opposed” sources: The Zionist Murdoch’s “right wing” FOX, and the Jew Sulzbergers’ “left wing” Jew York Times.

    Notice that the central questions are unanswered, and the main bias is unrevealed.

    The bias is that the “debunkers” are Jews. Intellectual honesty would have required a simple note like: “Keep in mind while reading the following that we are Jewish.” But we’re dealing with people who have no regard whatsoever for honesty.

    The central questions are: Does Mel Gibson share his father’s alleged beliefs. Are they in fact his father’s beliefs.

    On both questions, the verdict is: YES; because (a) “the general public is much less inclined nowadays to give him the benefit of the doubt”, and (b) it is simply asserted that Hutton Gibson is “may be considered an eccentric, a crackpot, or an anti-Semite (or some combination thereof) depending upon how charitably one views his utterances and beliefs.”

    Not dealt with are the matters of: Christ’s judgement of Jews; the role of the Pharisees an the Jewish mob in the Crucifixion; the Jews’ persecutions of Christians; the truth about the Holoco$t or “THE Holocaust”, and whether it was in fact “the greatest crime of the [20th] century”; who determines what is Christian Truth (notice how bizarre it is for Jews to hold up the Pope as the arbiter of all Christian dogma); and so on.

    Notice also the very Jewey line in the original email bitching about Mel Gibson: “I believe in free speech, but not when it [threatens] Jews.”

  8. ????? says:

    An overlooked Obama-Jew Connection, via the Jew gangster Annenberg:

    http://brianakira.wordpress.com/2008/10/12/what-is-factcheckorg/

    This Jew FactCheck site (like Snopes) was set up in order to “debunk” anyone who exposes the Jews and their Shabbos Goyim.

    + + +

    At Snopes.com, the Jewess Barbara Mikkelson and her husband, the Jew David Mikkelson, purport to debunk or confirm what they call “urban legends”.

    This Jewish operation has been widely pumped up by the Jews at National Review and similar Zio-Con sites. It’s also been given the kosher seal of approval by the Jews at FactCheck. Of course, neither National Review nor FactCheck mentioned the Jewey nature of Snopes, just like they won’t discuss their own status as outlets for Jew propaganda. They’ll all prattle on and on about “left” “right” “left” right” “left” “right” (marching to the Jews’ prison farm for the goyim) bias, but they’ll not discuss Jewist bias.

    For most Jews, there is no “left wing” or “right wing”. There’s just the Jew wing.

    FactCheck and Snopes is like FactCheck’s poor cousin. Fact Check is set up by a Mega-Zionist millionaire, with a large staff, and associated with numerous academic and “charitable” foundations. Snopes is just two small-time Jews on the make. But they serve the same puropse. Even though FactCheck is politicized and connected through and through, it’s widely cited as the last word on political scandals. And even though Snopes.com is just another blog, just another small-time hobby website run out of some Jew’s basement, they’re widely cited as “the last word” on contentious issues.

    This is the Jew way: The best way for them to settle a debate is to end the debate.

    That way the Jew yet again gets to determine “reality” for the goyim.

    As an example of how this works, here’s the Jewish Snopes.com on Mel Gibson:

    QUOTE

    Home > Politics > Religion > The Passion

    Claim: Actor Mel Gibson’s father has dismissed historical accounts of the Holocaust as impossible and denied that the September 11 terrorist attacks were perpetrated by Al Qaida hijackers.

    Status: True.

    Example: [Citing a mass-circulation email from 2003]:

    “In the New York Times Magazine of Sunday, March 9, 2003 it is reported that Mel Gibson is making a film of the last 6 hours of the life of Jesus Christ in which he purports to tell the “truth”, namely that the Jews are responsible for his death!

    “This canard has been discredited by all people of good will including the Pope. Yet Gibson, who is a member of an extreme Catholic sect called “Holy Family” which has distanced itself from the main body of catholicism and is not affiliated with the Roman Catholic Diocese is using his money and his high profile to finance and film this retrogressive and defamatory story.

    “Gibson, whose father, Hutton Gibson is a notorious Holocaust denier and who claims the the World Trade Center was destroyed by remote control and not by al Queda; that the Second Vatican Council was a Masonic plot backed by the Jews and that all popes going back to John XXIII have been illegitimate “anti-popes”.

    “The article goes on much longer and is not refuted by either party. I believe in free speech, but not when it fosters hatred and gives our enemies ammunition to perpetuate the greatest crime of the century and the continued persecution of Jews.

    “Four 4000 years we have been blamed for every wrong in the world. We will not tolerate this additional insult.

    “I urge you to read the article and also forward this message to all people who you feel should know about this. I, for one will no longer pay my money to see Gibson’s films, which support his continued racism.”

    Origins:

    The excerpts quoted above which are represented as appearing in the 9 March 2003 edition of the New York Times Magazine are accurate; they were drawn from a piece about actor Mel Gibson, his religion, and his father entitled “Is the Pope Catholic … Enough?” However, rather than being a straightforward summary of that article, the e-mailed version includes some rather selective quotes and lopsided commentary.

    Mel Gibson is a Catholic traditionalist who has used some of the monies he has earned as an actor to fund construction of a church in the Agoura Hills, California, area. His Holy Family Catholic Church includes one of 600 traditionalist chapels in operation today (where, unlike most modern Catholic churches, Sunday Mass is still conducted entirely in Latin) and is not recognized by the Holy See. Catholic traditionalists view modern church reforms as the work of either foolish liberals or hellbent heretics, preferring for themselves a version of Catholicism as it was practiced prior to the reforms enacted by the Second Vatican Council (commonly known as Vatican II) between 1963 and 1965.

    Mel Gibson’s 84-year-old father, Hutton Gibson, may be considered an eccentric, a crackpot, or an anti-Semite (or some combination thereof) depending upon how charitably one views his utterances and beliefs about religion and politics, but Mel himself has neither explicitly affirmed nor denied the opinions voiced by his father, responding to questions about them by ambiguously asserting that “My father has never told me a lie.” One paragraph from the original New York Times article not mentioned in the e-mail cited above addresses how much commonality of viewpoint there may be between father and son:

    “Whether any of this has rubbed off on Hutton’s son Mel is an open question. A church elder at Holy Family says that while the two share the same foundation of faith, Mel Gibson parts company with his father on many points. “He doesn’t go along with a lot of what his dad says,” he says. And beyond claiming to have seen the plans for Holy Family and attended services with the congregation, Hutton Gibson [who lives in Houston] has no apparent connection to his son’s church in California.”

    Given the younger Gibson’s anti-semitic outburst when he was arrested for driving under the influence in Malibu, California, on 28 July 2006, the general public is much less inclined nowadays to give him the benefit of the doubt regarding how much his world view truly diverges from that of his father.

    Last updated: 9 September 2006

    Sources:

    Friedman, Roger. “Church Digs Mel Gibson’s $5 Million.” FOXNews.com. 13 February 2006.

    Noxon, Christopher. “Is the Pope Catholic … Enough?” The New York Times. 9 March 2003 (Magazine; p. 60).

    UNQUOTE

    Notice the phony objectivity and the faux-academic manner at the end. The citations from two “ideologically opposed” sources: The Zionist Murdoch’s “right wing” FOX, and the Jew Sulzbergers’ “left wing” Jew York Times.

    Notice that the central questions are unanswered, and the main bias is unrevealed.

    The bias is that the “debunkers” are Jews. Intellectual honesty would have required a simple note like: “Keep in mind while reading the following that we are Jewish.” But we’re dealing with people who have no regard whatsoever for honesty.

    The central questions are: Does Mel Gibson share his father’s alleged beliefs. Are they in fact his father’s beliefs.

    On both questions, the verdict is: YES; because (a) “the general public is much less inclined nowadays to give him the benefit of the doubt”, and (b) it is simply asserted that Hutton Gibson is “may be considered an eccentric, a crackpot, or an anti-Semite (or some combination thereof) depending upon how charitably one views his utterances and beliefs.”

    Not dealt with are the matters of: Christ’s judgement of Jews; the role of the Pharisees an the Jewish mob in the Crucifixion; the Jews’ persecutions of Christians; the truth about the Holoco$t or “THE Holocaust”, and whether it was in fact “the greatest crime of the [20th] century”; who determines what is Christian Truth (notice how bizarre it is for Jews to hold up the Pope as the arbiter of all Christian dogma); and so on.

    Notice also the very Jewey line in the original email bitching about Mel Gibson: “I believe in free speech, but not when it [threatens] Jews.”

  9. ????? says:

    An overlooked Obama-Jew Connection, via the Jew gangster Annenberg:

    http://brianakira.wordpress.com/2008/10/12/what-is-factcheckorg/

    This Jew FactCheck site (like Snopes) was set up in order to “debunk” anyone who exposes the Jews and their Shabbos Goyim.

    + + +

    At Snopes.com, the Jewess Barbara Mikkelson and her husband, the Jew David Mikkelson, purport to debunk or confirm what they call “urban legends”.

    This Jewish operation has been widely pumped up by the Jews at National Review and similar Zio-Con sites. It’s also been given the kosher seal of approval by the Jews at FactCheck. Of course, neither National Review nor FactCheck mentioned the Jewey nature of Snopes, just like they won’t discuss their own status as outlets for Jew propaganda. They’ll all prattle on and on about “left” “right” “left” right” “left” “right” (marching to the Jews’ prison farm for the goyim) bias, but they’ll not discuss Jewist bias.

    For most Jews, there is no “left wing” or “right wing”. There’s just the Jew wing.

    FactCheck and Snopes is like FactCheck’s poor cousin. Fact Check is set up by a Mega-Zionist millionaire, with a large staff, and associated with numerous academic and “charitable” foundations. Snopes is just two small-time Jews on the make. But they serve the same puropse. Even though FactCheck is politicized and connected through and through, it’s widely cited as the last word on political scandals. And even though Snopes.com is just another blog, just another small-time hobby website run out of some Jew’s basement, they’re widely cited as “the last word” on contentious issues.

    This is the Jew way: The best way for them to settle a debate is to end the debate.

    That way the Jew yet again gets to determine “reality” for the goyim.

    As an example of how this works, here’s the Jewish Snopes.com on Mel Gibson:

    QUOTE

    Home > Politics > Religion > The Passion

    Claim: Actor Mel Gibson’s father has dismissed historical accounts of the Holocaust as impossible and denied that the September 11 terrorist attacks were perpetrated by Al Qaida hijackers.

    Status: True.

    Example: [Citing a mass-circulation email from 2003]:

    “In the New York Times Magazine of Sunday, March 9, 2003 it is reported that Mel Gibson is making a film of the last 6 hours of the life of Jesus Christ in which he purports to tell the “truth”, namely that the Jews are responsible for his death!

    “This canard has been discredited by all people of good will including the Pope. Yet Gibson, who is a member of an extreme Catholic sect called “Holy Family” which has distanced itself from the main body of catholicism and is not affiliated with the Roman Catholic Diocese is using his money and his high profile to finance and film this retrogressive and defamatory story.

    “Gibson, whose father, Hutton Gibson is a notorious Holocaust denier and who claims the the World Trade Center was destroyed by remote control and not by al Queda; that the Second Vatican Council was a Masonic plot backed by the Jews and that all popes going back to John XXIII have been illegitimate “anti-popes”.

    “The article goes on much longer and is not refuted by either party. I believe in free speech, but not when it fosters hatred and gives our enemies ammunition to perpetuate the greatest crime of the century and the continued persecution of Jews.

    “Four 4000 years we have been blamed for every wrong in the world. We will not tolerate this additional insult.

    “I urge you to read the article and also forward this message to all people who you feel should know about this. I, for one will no longer pay my money to see Gibson’s films, which support his continued racism.”

    Origins:

    The excerpts quoted above which are represented as appearing in the 9 March 2003 edition of the New York Times Magazine are accurate; they were drawn from a piece about actor Mel Gibson, his religion, and his father entitled “Is the Pope Catholic … Enough?” However, rather than being a straightforward summary of that article, the e-mailed version includes some rather selective quotes and lopsided commentary.

    Mel Gibson is a Catholic traditionalist who has used some of the monies he has earned as an actor to fund construction of a church in the Agoura Hills, California, area. His Holy Family Catholic Church includes one of 600 traditionalist chapels in operation today (where, unlike most modern Catholic churches, Sunday Mass is still conducted entirely in Latin) and is not recognized by the Holy See. Catholic traditionalists view modern church reforms as the work of either foolish liberals or hellbent heretics, preferring for themselves a version of Catholicism as it was practiced prior to the reforms enacted by the Second Vatican Council (commonly known as Vatican II) between 1963 and 1965.

    Mel Gibson’s 84-year-old father, Hutton Gibson, may be considered an eccentric, a crackpot, or an anti-Semite (or some combination thereof) depending upon how charitably one views his utterances and beliefs about religion and politics, but Mel himself has neither explicitly affirmed nor denied the opinions voiced by his father, responding to questions about them by ambiguously asserting that “My father has never told me a lie.” One paragraph from the original New York Times article not mentioned in the e-mail cited above addresses how much commonality of viewpoint there may be between father and son:

    “Whether any of this has rubbed off on Hutton’s son Mel is an open question. A church elder at Holy Family says that while the two share the same foundation of faith, Mel Gibson parts company with his father on many points. “He doesn’t go along with a lot of what his dad says,” he says. And beyond claiming to have seen the plans for Holy Family and attended services with the congregation, Hutton Gibson [who lives in Houston] has no apparent connection to his son’s church in California.”

    Given the younger Gibson’s anti-semitic outburst when he was arrested for driving under the influence in Malibu, California, on 28 July 2006, the general public is much less inclined nowadays to give him the benefit of the doubt regarding how much his world view truly diverges from that of his father.

    Last updated: 9 September 2006

    Sources:

    Friedman, Roger. “Church Digs Mel Gibson’s $5 Million.” FOXNews.com. 13 February 2006.

    Noxon, Christopher. “Is the Pope Catholic … Enough?” The New York Times. 9 March 2003 (Magazine; p. 60).

    UNQUOTE

    Notice the phony objectivity and the faux-academic manner at the end. The citations from two “ideologically opposed” sources: The Zionist Murdoch’s “right wing” FOX, and the Jew Sulzbergers’ “left wing” Jew York Times.

    Notice that the central questions are unanswered, and the main bias is unrevealed.

    The bias is that the “debunkers” are Jews. Intellectual honesty would have required a simple note like: “Keep in mind while reading the following that we are Jewish.” But we’re dealing with people who have no regard whatsoever for honesty.

    The central questions are: Does Mel Gibson share his father’s alleged beliefs. Are they in fact his father’s beliefs.

    On both questions, the verdict is: YES; because (a) “the general public is much less inclined nowadays to give him the benefit of the doubt”, and (b) it is simply asserted that Hutton Gibson is “may be considered an eccentric, a crackpot, or an anti-Semite (or some combination thereof) depending upon how charitably one views his utterances and beliefs.”

    Not dealt with are the matters of: Christ’s judgement of Jews; the role of the Pharisees an the Jewish mob in the Crucifixion; the Jews’ persecutions of Christians; the truth about the Holoco$t or “THE Holocaust”, and whether it was in fact “the greatest crime of the [20th] century”; who determines what is Christian Truth (notice how bizarre it is for Jews to hold up the Pope as the arbiter of all Christian dogma); and so on.

    Notice also the very Jewey line in the original email bitching about Mel Gibson: “I believe in free speech, but not when it [threatens] Jews.”

  10. ????? says:

    An overlooked Obama-Jew Connection, via the Jew gangster Annenberg:

    http://brianakira.wordpress.com/2008/10/12/what-is-factcheckorg/

    This Jew FactCheck site (like Snopes) was set up in order to “debunk” anyone who exposes the Jews and their Shabbos Goyim.

    + + +

    At Snopes.com, the Jewess Barbara Mikkelson and her husband, the Jew David Mikkelson, purport to debunk or confirm what they call “urban legends”.

    This Jewish operation has been widely pumped up by the Jews at National Review and similar Zio-Con sites. It’s also been given the kosher seal of approval by the Jews at FactCheck. Of course, neither National Review nor FactCheck mentioned the Jewey nature of Snopes, just like they won’t discuss their own status as outlets for Jew propaganda. They’ll all prattle on and on about “left” “right” “left” right” “left” “right” (marching to the Jews’ prison farm for the goyim) bias, but they’ll not discuss Jewist bias.

    For most Jews, there is no “left wing” or “right wing”. There’s just the Jew wing.

    FactCheck and Snopes is like FactCheck’s poor cousin. Fact Check is set up by a Mega-Zionist millionaire, with a large staff, and associated with numerous academic and “charitable” foundations. Snopes is just two small-time Jews on the make. But they serve the same puropse. Even though FactCheck is politicized and connected through and through, it’s widely cited as the last word on political scandals. And even though Snopes.com is just another blog, just another small-time hobby website run out of some Jew’s basement, they’re widely cited as “the last word” on contentious issues.

    This is the Jew way: The best way for them to settle a debate is to end the debate.

    That way the Jew yet again gets to determine “reality” for the goyim.

    As an example of how this works, here’s the Jewish Snopes.com on Mel Gibson:

    QUOTE

    Home > Politics > Religion > The Passion

    Claim: Actor Mel Gibson’s father has dismissed historical accounts of the Holocaust as impossible and denied that the September 11 terrorist attacks were perpetrated by Al Qaida hijackers.

    Status: True.

    Example: [Citing a mass-circulation email from 2003]:

    “In the New York Times Magazine of Sunday, March 9, 2003 it is reported that Mel Gibson is making a film of the last 6 hours of the life of Jesus Christ in which he purports to tell the “truth”, namely that the Jews are responsible for his death!

    “This canard has been discredited by all people of good will including the Pope. Yet Gibson, who is a member of an extreme Catholic sect called “Holy Family” which has distanced itself from the main body of catholicism and is not affiliated with the Roman Catholic Diocese is using his money and his high profile to finance and film this retrogressive and defamatory story.

    “Gibson, whose father, Hutton Gibson is a notorious Holocaust denier and who claims the the World Trade Center was destroyed by remote control and not by al Queda; that the Second Vatican Council was a Masonic plot backed by the Jews and that all popes going back to John XXIII have been illegitimate “anti-popes”.

    “The article goes on much longer and is not refuted by either party. I believe in free speech, but not when it fosters hatred and gives our enemies ammunition to perpetuate the greatest crime of the century and the continued persecution of Jews.

    “Four 4000 years we have been blamed for every wrong in the world. We will not tolerate this additional insult.

    “I urge you to read the article and also forward this message to all people who you feel should know about this. I, for one will no longer pay my money to see Gibson’s films, which support his continued racism.”

    Origins:

    The excerpts quoted above which are represented as appearing in the 9 March 2003 edition of the New York Times Magazine are accurate; they were drawn from a piece about actor Mel Gibson, his religion, and his father entitled “Is the Pope Catholic … Enough?” However, rather than being a straightforward summary of that article, the e-mailed version includes some rather selective quotes and lopsided commentary.

    Mel Gibson is a Catholic traditionalist who has used some of the monies he has earned as an actor to fund construction of a church in the Agoura Hills, California, area. His Holy Family Catholic Church includes one of 600 traditionalist chapels in operation today (where, unlike most modern Catholic churches, Sunday Mass is still conducted entirely in Latin) and is not recognized by the Holy See. Catholic traditionalists view modern church reforms as the work of either foolish liberals or hellbent heretics, preferring for themselves a version of Catholicism as it was practiced prior to the reforms enacted by the Second Vatican Council (commonly known as Vatican II) between 1963 and 1965.

    Mel Gibson’s 84-year-old father, Hutton Gibson, may be considered an eccentric, a crackpot, or an anti-Semite (or some combination thereof) depending upon how charitably one views his utterances and beliefs about religion and politics, but Mel himself has neither explicitly affirmed nor denied the opinions voiced by his father, responding to questions about them by ambiguously asserting that “My father has never told me a lie.” One paragraph from the original New York Times article not mentioned in the e-mail cited above addresses how much commonality of viewpoint there may be between father and son:

    “Whether any of this has rubbed off on Hutton’s son Mel is an open question. A church elder at Holy Family says that while the two share the same foundation of faith, Mel Gibson parts company with his father on many points. “He doesn’t go along with a lot of what his dad says,” he says. And beyond claiming to have seen the plans for Holy Family and attended services with the congregation, Hutton Gibson [who lives in Houston] has no apparent connection to his son’s church in California.”

    Given the younger Gibson’s anti-semitic outburst when he was arrested for driving under the influence in Malibu, California, on 28 July 2006, the general public is much less inclined nowadays to give him the benefit of the doubt regarding how much his world view truly diverges from that of his father.

    Last updated: 9 September 2006

    Sources:

    Friedman, Roger. “Church Digs Mel Gibson’s $5 Million.” FOXNews.com. 13 February 2006.

    Noxon, Christopher. “Is the Pope Catholic … Enough?” The New York Times. 9 March 2003 (Magazine; p. 60).

    UNQUOTE

    Notice the phony objectivity and the faux-academic manner at the end. The citations from two “ideologically opposed” sources: The Zionist Murdoch’s “right wing” FOX, and the Jew Sulzbergers’ “left wing” Jew York Times.

    Notice that the central questions are unanswered, and the main bias is unrevealed.

    The bias is that the “debunkers” are Jews. Intellectual honesty would have required a simple note like: “Keep in mind while reading the following that we are Jewish.” But we’re dealing with people who have no regard whatsoever for honesty.

    The central questions are: Does Mel Gibson share his father’s alleged beliefs. Are they in fact his father’s beliefs.

    On both questions, the verdict is: YES; because (a) “the general public is much less inclined nowadays to give him the benefit of the doubt”, and (b) it is simply asserted that Hutton Gibson is “may be considered an eccentric, a crackpot, or an anti-Semite (or some combination thereof) depending upon how charitably one views his utterances and beliefs.”

    Not dealt with are the matters of: Christ’s judgement of Jews; the role of the Pharisees an the Jewish mob in the Crucifixion; the Jews’ persecutions of Christians; the truth about the Holoco$t or “THE Holocaust”, and whether it was in fact “the greatest crime of the [20th] century”; who determines what is Christian Truth (notice how bizarre it is for Jews to hold up the Pope as the arbiter of all Christian dogma); and so on.

    Notice also the very Jewey line in the original email bitching about Mel Gibson: “I believe in free speech, but not when it [threatens] Jews.”

  11. kerdasi amaq says:

    About the Plane crash in Poland.

    http://the-tap.blogspot.com/2010/04/polish-planes-flight-path.html

    This article has two interesting pictures showing the plane’s descent into Smolensk and the crash site.

    “From the flight path picture above, the green line shows the correct approach to Smolensk airport. For some reason the plane descended on a steeper line and headed into a depression. The pilot realised his error and tried to regain altitude, but before he could do so, he began to hit a series of trees, which were in his way as he climbed up and out of the depression.”

  12. ????? says:

    k.a.

    The Poles’ Puppet Prez was one of the biggest Zionized Jewbified politicians in Europe.

    Not only that, but the fucking Zio-pig lied about the Katyn Massacre.

    He said on a number of occasions that it is important to “remember” that more than 10% of the victims at Katyn were Jews. THat’s nonsense. According to the CIA and Yad Vashem, less than 2.25 % of the victims were Jews, and that doesn’t excuse the Jews who killed them. For one thing, the most famous Jew murdered at Katyn by the NKVD was a Rabbi Baruch Steinberg, who was an army chaplain. Soviet Jews had no problem killing other Jews, especially rabbis. And considering that Rabbi Steinberg was a Polish patriot and was arrested along with other Polish officers at Church, attending a Christmas ceremony, I’m sure the Jews in the NKVD had no qualms about torturing hi=m and putting a bullet through his head.

    Good riddance to Jew-slave Kaczynski. May God have mercy on him.

  13. ????? says:

    k.a.

    The Poles’ Puppet Prez was one of the biggest Zionized Jewbified politicians in Europe.

    Not only that, but the fucking Zio-pig lied about the Katyn Massacre.

    He said on a number of occasions that it is important to “remember” that more than 10% of the victims at Katyn were Jews. THat’s nonsense. According to the CIA and Yad Vashem, less than 2.25 % of the victims were Jews, and that doesn’t excuse the Jews who killed them. For one thing, the most famous Jew murdered at Katyn by the NKVD was a Rabbi Baruch Steinberg, who was an army chaplain. Soviet Jews had no problem killing other Jews, especially rabbis. And considering that Rabbi Steinberg was a Polish patriot and was arrested along with other Polish officers at Church, attending a Christmas ceremony, I’m sure the Jews in the NKVD had no qualms about torturing hi=m and putting a bullet through his head.

    Good riddance to Jew-slave Kaczynski. May God have mercy on him.

  14. ????? says:

    k.a.

    The Poles’ Puppet Prez was one of the biggest Zionized Jewbified politicians in Europe.

    Not only that, but the fucking Zio-pig lied about the Katyn Massacre.

    He said on a number of occasions that it is important to “remember” that more than 10% of the victims at Katyn were Jews. THat’s nonsense. According to the CIA and Yad Vashem, less than 2.25 % of the victims were Jews, and that doesn’t excuse the Jews who killed them. For one thing, the most famous Jew murdered at Katyn by the NKVD was a Rabbi Baruch Steinberg, who was an army chaplain. Soviet Jews had no problem killing other Jews, especially rabbis. And considering that Rabbi Steinberg was a Polish patriot and was arrested along with other Polish officers at Church, attending a Christmas ceremony, I’m sure the Jews in the NKVD had no qualms about torturing hi=m and putting a bullet through his head.

    Good riddance to Jew-slave Kaczynski. May God have mercy on him.

  15. ????? says:

    k.a.

    The Poles’ Puppet Prez was one of the biggest Zionized Jewbified politicians in Europe.

    Not only that, but the fucking Zio-pig lied about the Katyn Massacre.

    He said on a number of occasions that it is important to “remember” that more than 10% of the victims at Katyn were Jews. THat’s nonsense. According to the CIA and Yad Vashem, less than 2.25 % of the victims were Jews, and that doesn’t excuse the Jews who killed them. For one thing, the most famous Jew murdered at Katyn by the NKVD was a Rabbi Baruch Steinberg, who was an army chaplain. Soviet Jews had no problem killing other Jews, especially rabbis. And considering that Rabbi Steinberg was a Polish patriot and was arrested along with other Polish officers at Church, attending a Christmas ceremony, I’m sure the Jews in the NKVD had no qualms about torturing hi=m and putting a bullet through his head.

    Good riddance to Jew-slave Kaczynski. May God have mercy on him.

  16. ????? says:

    From the CIA’s Bennie Fischer (Jew):

    “Dr. Simon Schochet, a Polish-Jewish historian…revealed that several hundred of the Katyn victims were Jewish. Establishing the presence of Jewish victims illuminates the complexity of the Katyn story. Goebbels reportedly hesitated at first to expose the massacre when he learned that a number of the victims were Polish Jews. And some historians have attempted to portray Katyn as a “Jewish crime” perpetrated by “Jewish-Bolsheviks” against ethnic Poles.”

    Yad Vashem now claims, based on the Jew Schochet’s “research”, that 10% of the Polish Army was Jewish, and 10% of Katyn victims were Jewish.

    First of all, it’s hardly surprising that Jews would support the Polish Army against Nazi Germany. Also, they were at least 10% of the population.

    But I doubt that they even made up 2% of the Katyn victims, and as already mentioned, their murders don’t mean that Jews weren’t involved in the killing, esp. considering that Schochet includes half-Jews, Christian ex-Jews, and Jewish aristocrats and so-called “bourgeoisie” as victims.

  17. ????? says:

    From the CIA’s Bennie Fischer (Jew):

    “Dr. Simon Schochet, a Polish-Jewish historian…revealed that several hundred of the Katyn victims were Jewish. Establishing the presence of Jewish victims illuminates the complexity of the Katyn story. Goebbels reportedly hesitated at first to expose the massacre when he learned that a number of the victims were Polish Jews. And some historians have attempted to portray Katyn as a “Jewish crime” perpetrated by “Jewish-Bolsheviks” against ethnic Poles.”

    Yad Vashem now claims, based on the Jew Schochet’s “research”, that 10% of the Polish Army was Jewish, and 10% of Katyn victims were Jewish.

    First of all, it’s hardly surprising that Jews would support the Polish Army against Nazi Germany. Also, they were at least 10% of the population.

    But I doubt that they even made up 2% of the Katyn victims, and as already mentioned, their murders don’t mean that Jews weren’t involved in the killing, esp. considering that Schochet includes half-Jews, Christian ex-Jews, and Jewish aristocrats and so-called “bourgeoisie” as victims.

  18. ????? says:

    From the CIA’s Bennie Fischer (Jew):

    “Dr. Simon Schochet, a Polish-Jewish historian…revealed that several hundred of the Katyn victims were Jewish. Establishing the presence of Jewish victims illuminates the complexity of the Katyn story. Goebbels reportedly hesitated at first to expose the massacre when he learned that a number of the victims were Polish Jews. And some historians have attempted to portray Katyn as a “Jewish crime” perpetrated by “Jewish-Bolsheviks” against ethnic Poles.”

    Yad Vashem now claims, based on the Jew Schochet’s “research”, that 10% of the Polish Army was Jewish, and 10% of Katyn victims were Jewish.

    First of all, it’s hardly surprising that Jews would support the Polish Army against Nazi Germany. Also, they were at least 10% of the population.

    But I doubt that they even made up 2% of the Katyn victims, and as already mentioned, their murders don’t mean that Jews weren’t involved in the killing, esp. considering that Schochet includes half-Jews, Christian ex-Jews, and Jewish aristocrats and so-called “bourgeoisie” as victims.

  19. ????? says:

    From the CIA’s Bennie Fischer (Jew):

    “Dr. Simon Schochet, a Polish-Jewish historian…revealed that several hundred of the Katyn victims were Jewish. Establishing the presence of Jewish victims illuminates the complexity of the Katyn story. Goebbels reportedly hesitated at first to expose the massacre when he learned that a number of the victims were Polish Jews. And some historians have attempted to portray Katyn as a “Jewish crime” perpetrated by “Jewish-Bolsheviks” against ethnic Poles.”

    Yad Vashem now claims, based on the Jew Schochet’s “research”, that 10% of the Polish Army was Jewish, and 10% of Katyn victims were Jewish.

    First of all, it’s hardly surprising that Jews would support the Polish Army against Nazi Germany. Also, they were at least 10% of the population.

    But I doubt that they even made up 2% of the Katyn victims, and as already mentioned, their murders don’t mean that Jews weren’t involved in the killing, esp. considering that Schochet includes half-Jews, Christian ex-Jews, and Jewish aristocrats and so-called “bourgeoisie” as victims.

  20. ????? says:

    To get an idea of the developing Jewish propaganda surrounding Katyn (which the Jews’ slave Puppet Kaczinski helped promote), check out this excerpt from The Jewish Chronicles review of Andrej Wajda’s film “Katyn”:

    “In Katyn he has created a wartime Poland that is bizarrely and entirely Jew-free. Throughout all the scenes of invasions and occupation — most of the action takes place in Crakow — there is not a single flash of a yellow star. Yet, as he must surely know, at least 10 per cent of Poland’s population was Jewish and half of the six million Polish citizens who died in the war were Jews. The greatest part of the Holocaust took place — very publicly — in Poland. For that matter at least 450 of the Polish military officers murdered at Katyn were Jews, including Baruch Steinberg, the chief rabbi of the Polish Army.

    “Yet Wajda has written them all out of the story, just as Stalin erased his enemies from official photographs. This is not as awful as the right-wing Polish versions, all too common on the internet, that try to blame Katyn on the Bolshevik Jews (the infamous pogrom at Jedwabne in 1943 was carried out by Polish peasants convinced that Jews were somehow responsible for Katyn). Nevertheless, Wajda’s is a lie of omission that is almost as repulsive as the great lie the film is intended to attack.”

    So Wajda’s film is almost as repulsive as the Jews’ USSR’s lies?

    BTW,

    450 out of 22000 = 2%

    [and anyway, I’m sure that “450” is a lie.]

  21. ????? says:

    To get an idea of the developing Jewish propaganda surrounding Katyn (which the Jews’ slave Puppet Kaczinski helped promote), check out this excerpt from The Jewish Chronicles review of Andrej Wajda’s film “Katyn”:

    “In Katyn he has created a wartime Poland that is bizarrely and entirely Jew-free. Throughout all the scenes of invasions and occupation — most of the action takes place in Crakow — there is not a single flash of a yellow star. Yet, as he must surely know, at least 10 per cent of Poland’s population was Jewish and half of the six million Polish citizens who died in the war were Jews. The greatest part of the Holocaust took place — very publicly — in Poland. For that matter at least 450 of the Polish military officers murdered at Katyn were Jews, including Baruch Steinberg, the chief rabbi of the Polish Army.

    “Yet Wajda has written them all out of the story, just as Stalin erased his enemies from official photographs. This is not as awful as the right-wing Polish versions, all too common on the internet, that try to blame Katyn on the Bolshevik Jews (the infamous pogrom at Jedwabne in 1943 was carried out by Polish peasants convinced that Jews were somehow responsible for Katyn). Nevertheless, Wajda’s is a lie of omission that is almost as repulsive as the great lie the film is intended to attack.”

    So Wajda’s film is almost as repulsive as the Jews’ USSR’s lies?

    BTW,

    450 out of 22000 = 2%

    [and anyway, I’m sure that “450” is a lie.]

  22. ????? says:

    To get an idea of the developing Jewish propaganda surrounding Katyn (which the Jews’ slave Puppet Kaczinski helped promote), check out this excerpt from The Jewish Chronicles review of Andrej Wajda’s film “Katyn”:

    “In Katyn he has created a wartime Poland that is bizarrely and entirely Jew-free. Throughout all the scenes of invasions and occupation — most of the action takes place in Crakow — there is not a single flash of a yellow star. Yet, as he must surely know, at least 10 per cent of Poland’s population was Jewish and half of the six million Polish citizens who died in the war were Jews. The greatest part of the Holocaust took place — very publicly — in Poland. For that matter at least 450 of the Polish military officers murdered at Katyn were Jews, including Baruch Steinberg, the chief rabbi of the Polish Army.

    “Yet Wajda has written them all out of the story, just as Stalin erased his enemies from official photographs. This is not as awful as the right-wing Polish versions, all too common on the internet, that try to blame Katyn on the Bolshevik Jews (the infamous pogrom at Jedwabne in 1943 was carried out by Polish peasants convinced that Jews were somehow responsible for Katyn). Nevertheless, Wajda’s is a lie of omission that is almost as repulsive as the great lie the film is intended to attack.”

    So Wajda’s film is almost as repulsive as the Jews’ USSR’s lies?

    BTW,

    450 out of 22000 = 2%

    [and anyway, I’m sure that “450” is a lie.]

  23. ????? says:

    To get an idea of the developing Jewish propaganda surrounding Katyn (which the Jews’ slave Puppet Kaczinski helped promote), check out this excerpt from The Jewish Chronicles review of Andrej Wajda’s film “Katyn”:

    “In Katyn he has created a wartime Poland that is bizarrely and entirely Jew-free. Throughout all the scenes of invasions and occupation — most of the action takes place in Crakow — there is not a single flash of a yellow star. Yet, as he must surely know, at least 10 per cent of Poland’s population was Jewish and half of the six million Polish citizens who died in the war were Jews. The greatest part of the Holocaust took place — very publicly — in Poland. For that matter at least 450 of the Polish military officers murdered at Katyn were Jews, including Baruch Steinberg, the chief rabbi of the Polish Army.

    “Yet Wajda has written them all out of the story, just as Stalin erased his enemies from official photographs. This is not as awful as the right-wing Polish versions, all too common on the internet, that try to blame Katyn on the Bolshevik Jews (the infamous pogrom at Jedwabne in 1943 was carried out by Polish peasants convinced that Jews were somehow responsible for Katyn). Nevertheless, Wajda’s is a lie of omission that is almost as repulsive as the great lie the film is intended to attack.”

    So Wajda’s film is almost as repulsive as the Jews’ USSR’s lies?

    BTW,

    450 out of 22000 = 2%

    [and anyway, I’m sure that “450” is a lie.]

  24. Bella says:

    Akira is just a dink, thats all.

  25. Cannibal Rabbi says:

    Bella.

    You mean one ‘o these ?

    [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yfdowEqsvM&hl=en_GB&fs=1&]

  26. Bella says:

    Cannibal Rebbe…you might also enjoy this….you can tune a piano…but you can’t tune a fish! (perhaps we should meet for peanut butter & jelly sandwiches?)

  27. Cannibal Rabbi says:

    Bella.

    Maybe one day. When all this madness is but a memory.

    ‘Til then. Try this one:
    http://www.rhymesandsongs.com/nursery_rhymes/dingdong.html

    And hold the jelly!

  28. Bella says:

    Cannibal Rabbi. Thx. A welcome addition to my collection!-

  29. Hoff says:

    So Wajda’s film is almost as repulsive as the Jews’ USSR’s lies? -Akira_

    http://incogman.wordpress.com/2010/04/20/sarah-palin-zionists-tea-party-trojan-horse/comment-page-4/#comment-58395

    ===

    Hoff say> Yes, in the Jew Only world all nonjews are repulsive. What did l tell you was the jews biggest problem some 200 years ago and why the jews have been expelled over 150 times the last 2.ooo years? That the jews was discovered when they had taken control of the king.

    The jews solution was to HIDE at any cost. What we see here the jews claiming that jews was shoot, too, at Katyn is just another day in the Lying Jew Scumbags propaganda-machine page 1A: ALWAYS blame the victims and claim jewish victimhood.

    See Stalin the jew-hater propaganda. Tell people that jews was in control of Sovjet they will tell you Stalin persecuted jews, hence the jew could not run the Sovjet state. What is it all about? To HIDE that jews was in totally control of Sovjet. To HIDE that jews killed at least 20 million russians.

    The jew MO on Katyn is the same, claime jewish victims, hence the jews could not have done Katyn. There was not one single jew shoot in Katyn. Period This is just another day in the Lying Jew Scumbags propaganda machine. How many jews does it take to “discover” 450 dead jews at Katyn? One, one jew is all it takes. Then it take some other 25 jews to print the BS in all major jew-paper in the world and next everybody, jew and nonjew just the same, “knows” that some jews was killed at Katyn by “russians”. – by Hoff

    =========

    The world needs more humble genius, there are to few of us 9D)

  30. ????? says:

    Bella: “Akira is just a dink, thats all.”

    Brutta’s just a rancid whore’s cunt, that’s all.

  31. ????? says:

    Bella: “Akira is just a dink, thats all.”

    Brutta’s just a rancid whore’s cunt, that’s all.

  32. ????? says:

    Bella: “Akira is just a dink, thats all.”

    Brutta’s just a rancid whore’s cunt, that’s all.

  33. ????? says:

    Bella: “Akira is just a dink, thats all.”

    Brutta’s just a rancid whore’s cunt, that’s all.

  34. Micheal says:

    Liberals are so mad, that despite hiding their socialist core behind any victim they can round up like cowards, despite controlling all media, unions, film, education, and all the other same old regurgitated entities they spawn to hide behind, that the American people still won’t buy into their lies. It makes them so mad that they still can’t make Americans roll over and give up our beliefs and culture, that they hate so much, (don’t we let Harvard and New England think for us? Who needs God when we have philosopher kings from academia to worship)? and they have yet to deal with RON PAUL! They actually thought they had won! That they ever could in America! What morons! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

  35. Hoff says:

    “Liberal” is jewish CODEWORD for jewish communism. Communist and liberal is the same thing. NEVER use the jewish codeword “liberal” or “socialist in any context, except to explain that it’s jewish communism.

  36. TheGoyIDF says:

    Saw someone comment about the EDL, where here are some photos of them

    http://www.tentaclesofzion.com/miscellaneous/neonazis-for-israel/

    And some of Geert Wilders

    http://www.tentaclesofzion.com/propaganda/geert-wilders-is-a-zionist-jew/

  37. Anonymous says:

    Howdy! I’ve been doing lots of other things, in the 3D world. Annoe Oakley and I confer daily. I am sorry for fogetting to stop in, and say “Howdy”. This article is THE BEST delination of the Palinchiran Candidate, and the Zio Tyranny. As always, Kudo, Icogman.

    P.S. -Where can we go? We need to get out of Tel A-Dodgesky. Is there anywhere left to go? My TP groups are 110% co-opted. The shocking element is how little it takes….1 shekel. Not 30. Even those hip to the scene – Joo Tyranny – won’t do a single thing about it.

  38. Micheal says:

    Anon 4.02, is that you Nemesys?

  39. Nemesys says:

    Hi – that Howdy message was from me!

  40. Nemesys says:

    Incogman – I am very sorry about yout pal. I’m glad he is physically Ok. I feel like we are under absolutely direct physical danger. Have you read Darkmoon’s article, on the Occidental Observer site? Re: the death of America?

    We are gonna be hunted down like dogs. Our killers will be rewarded. What do we do?

  41. kerdasi amaq says:

    The good lord has already answered that question.

    Do unto others as… also reads: as they do unto you, so you do unto them!

  42. Geronino says:

    Does anyone have a link to information concerning the death of a “white supremacist” attorney at the hands of a black youth neighbor whom he once hired to cut his yard?

  43. Bella says:

    Akira, darling, you do have a way with words!

  44. Flanders says:

    I don’t know what is going on with the Nevada issue. I’m just posting the link in case someone else can make a connection as to who is screwing who, but I don’t think true Tea Partiers would ever be supporting Reid.

    “The Tea Party of Nevada’s most vocal opponents aren’t Democrats; they’re tea party activists. The Tea Party of Nevada has formed an official third party, and will be fielding its own candidate in the race to dislodge Harry Reid. But that’s drawn howls of protest from tea party groups that oppose officially forming a third party, with some even accusing the group of being a ruse cooked up by Democrats to split the conservative vote.”

    http://www.newser.com/story/83307/tea-party-of-nevada-is-a-conspiracy-says-tea-party.html

  45. Jay says:

    Speaking of Trojan Horses look at this propaganda B.S. from this zionist troll.
    http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/vargas/100428

    But we all know the anti-semitic trick

  46. Marshall says:

    Kerdasi-

    The Talmud has its own interpretation of the Golden Rule:

    Moed Kattan 17a . If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there.

    😀

  47. Marshall says:

    Not too hard to see where Palin’s bread is buttered- William Kristol is a backer

    http://jewsforsarah.com/

  48. kerdasi amaq says:

    Marshall

    Read Nemesys’s last post up the thread. Mine is a follow-on from that.

  49. Bella says:

    I must question the AGE of one such as ‘Christal’.

  50. Hoff says:

    One comment on the bogus accusation antismite or how the hell that jew bullshit is spelled:

    maryamsm I really don’t see why Jews need a country. Look at what they do with just 1/900th of the planet…imagine what they’d do to the rest.

  51. Geronimo says:

    Dr. Duke addresses the Tea Party.

    [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDeNBsD8iRc]

  52. Flanders says:

    “Jewish Americans for Sarah Palin is an independent group of academic, religious and political leaders, dedicated to promoting consideration of Gov. Sarah Palin’s political positions in the wider American Jewish community.

    We find Ms. Palin’s policy positions on Israel, Iran, national security, fiscal responsibility, energy, and social policy – as well as her record on these issues as governor of Alaska and candidate for Vice President of the United States – to be serious, substantive and politically mainstream.”

    http://jewsforsarah.com/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.