The Truth of Silence

By T Stokes, April 7th 2011

Almost 70 years ago on May 10 1941, Hitler sent his deputy Rudolph Hess to Britain to try a stop to World War II before it became the all-consuming conflict we know of today.

The offer was for Germany to pull back all its forces and put the map back to where it was before war broke out. Hitler also sought an agreement to put an end to the bombing of civilian targets.

In short Hitler wanted a peace accord with Britain and its Commonwealth allies so he could concentrate his efforts on what he saw as the real threat to Germany, Communist Russia.

The year before in late May through early June, most of the British Expeditionary Force had evaded capture by Germany’s invading armies in France. When in Churchill’s words “the whole root and core and brain of the British Army” had been stranded at Dunkirk and seemed about to perish or be captured.

It was almost as if they had been allowed to escape, as if even then Hitler still had hopes for an alliance with Britain. 

For much of what follows I owe a debt of gratitude to the Bletchley Park code breaker John Burrows whose remit was the Hess coded signals, and Churchill secretaries Joan Bright-Astley and Patrick Kinna.

Patrick claimed that the Focus group that backed Churchill were vampire-like Jewish bankers who twisted everything backwards and were jocularly known not as the Focus group but the Sucof group. These bankers wanted revenge on Germany for banning them and their usurious banking practises. These same bankers under Juan March had also bribed Franco to keep Spain out of the war; so Churchill was afraid that their apparent anti communism might make them side with Hitler.

Even at that late juncture the war could have been stopped had Winston Churchill and his financial backers not been committed to it.

However, as I’ve claimed at lectures, Hess’s seizure was an MI6 ‘sting’ operation to bring him into British hands. This despite the fact that most British intelligence personnel were against the war, which is why Churchill started the Special Operations Executive recruiting them from left leaning, pro communist linguists.

The TV producer John Leighs statement fits what we know; when he said Hess’s arrival was expected and his father who was in MI6 was told, and I quote: “get into your motorbike and sidecar and go and pick up a senior German official and bring him back here, use utmost haste before the others get to him”.

The “others” I take to mean Churchill’s men.

Remember that Neville Chamberlain previously commissioned a secret 4-year investigation into Hitler and the Third Reich, which concluded that Germany was not a threat to Britain but to Russia; which is why when Britain was the world’s biggest sea power, Germany did not build up hers believing that Britain could join them against Russia.

Incidentally Chamberlain, like intelligence chief Vernon Kell, the king’s brother the Duke of Kent and Polish leader General Sikorski were all murdered because they disagreed with Churchill’s plans for war. While the head of the British naval intelligence Admiral Barry Domville was incarcerated without trial throughout the war for insisting that the Soviets, not Germany, was the real threat.

So closely did Neville Chamberlain’s government work with Germany against the Communist threat prior to WWII that Joachim Von Ribbentrop, the German diplomat asked permission from both governments if he could retire to Cornwall. The author Andrew Lanyon spent 3 years researching this and claimed that Ribbentrop loved the region, particularly St Ives. While Hitler himself wanted Britain to be a holiday retreat for all Anglo-Saxon peoples.

Because the Russian royal family were murdered in 1917 in the Rothschild sponsored revolution, Britain’s own Royal family who were close to their Russian cousins, were terrified of a communist take over and secretly supported Hitler. Even while the Queen Mother was being particularly vocal about how awful Hitler was, she was secretly sending money to the Nazis.

This despite her well-known miserliness reveals how afraid the Royal Family was of communism. While the real reason for the abdication of the immensely popular King Edward VIII had nothing to do with Wallace Simpson, but his continual peacemaking efforts with Nazi Germany.

The British Home Secretary Herbert Morrison, a senior member of the Jewish underground supporting Russia, is on record as saying that he “wished to see Bolshevisation all across Europe.”

The records for Manton Court where Rudolph Hess was held are still in the restricted archives. Although Hess was continually drugged and beaten, never once did he tell who the supporters for peace were either in the Royal family or outside it. And although he was locked up throughout the war he was still found guilty at Nuremberg and remained imprisoned for the rest of his life.

There have been many questions about whether the man held at Spandau was indeed Hess and if he did in fact commit suicide in 1987.

The war department propaganda operative Sefton Delmer said in a rare radio interview that Hess was incarcerated and subsequently murdered to stop him from telling what really happened. Now I don’t have any political leanings either way but I do feel that after 70 years we should know the truth of why we declared war on Germany when WWII could have been stopped with Hess’s visit.

As far as I’m concerned this exposes Winston Churchill for the traitor he really was.

T Stokes, London

With thanks to many people including arresting officers, Spandau guards and intelligence personnel over many years.

Also see: ‘The life and death of Rudolph Hess’ by Wolf Rudiger Hess, his son.

Read more here on my site: A Real-Life Man in the Iron Mask Story


100% White boy born and bred in the USA. Dedicated to awakening Whites to all the crap being done to our decent, fair-minded race and exposing the devious brainwashing rats behind it all. Wake the ef up, White people!
This entry was posted in History and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

136 Responses to The Truth of Silence

  1. hollowcrap says:

    America is the garbage dump scavengers(jew) colon.

  2. Frank Fredenburg says:

    AP Exclusive: FBI Thought Demjanjuk Evidence Faked

    I found this article on Yahoo News. Remember this poor guy the jews have hounded for years? Even now that he is almost dead!

  3. Citizenfitz says:

    So… White Patriot’s a Jew! LOL! I knew it.

  4. Geez… I have not commented on any of Incogman’s fine articles for the last few days, but this one is absolutely fabulous!

    And BTW… To add to the Tales From The HolyCo$t Files: You can add besides the drinking of Urine and bathing in piss files, the tales about swallowing and daily defecating of diamonds, as well as the tale about escaping and living with wolves in the forrest!

    Thanks for all the great comments, everyone!

  5. hollowcrap says:

    I remember when Mr. Betzhold caught Gil and I stealing some of his grapes. Without warning, he planted his size 12 shoe firmly in our behinds. This jump start was sufficient for us to leap over the fence and escape. If we hadn’t escaped, he probably would have gassed us in his unkempt out-house with fake toilet paper. YHWH was with us that day and that’s why we “survived” that holocaust. I’d probably have forgotten the episode, and near death experience, except for one thing. He was a Nazi! Or at least he looked like one. Or maybe someone said he was one. Anyway, I did some further checking and discovered that old man Thomas had sold him the shoe strings which were used in the shoes which kicked us nearly to eternity. Mr. Thomas was doing business with Nazis by selling them shoestrings!!!! If those shoestrings were not sold, then Mr. Betzhold would have lost his shoe at the first kick attempt and probably landed on his back thus preventing our holocaust from happening. Since Mr. Betzhold is no longer alive, we had no other course but to sue Mr. Thomas. If this is successful, then Gil will look into the source of those shoestrings. If his research leads favorably, then we’ll have another entity to sue. There is no way of telling where this will all end. The shoe strings were made of cotton and that could be traceable to plantations and slavery. Hell matey, this is better than the stock market. Is it possible to sue God for inventing cotton?
    As the jews intensify their extortion rackets, My prediction: The stupid tax-paying goyim will continue to pay, one way or the other, until the Golden Goose finally dies.

  6. GTRman says:

    ” America has now been subverted and reconfigured as a Golem of Jewry”. –Lynda–

    “That is one hell of a onliner Lynda!!! Every single non-jew in the whole world should read that oneliner. l’m going to post that oneliner up at my blog.” -Hoff

    Maybe it was even founded as such.

  7. Marwinsing says:

    hollowcrap says:
    April 10, 2011 at 1:16 pm

    The White jerks who think they can elect mestizo mayors, Chinese governors, and such, and still believe that they will treat us as we so generously treated them, will have one super fine dandy awakening, as did those idiots in Rhodesia and South Africa, to their regret.

    Hold it china you do not call me an idiot. As a born and bred White South African and part of a 7% minority group in my country of birth, most of us have been gagged in terms of having any say about our destiny. Apartheid had huge cock-ups and don’t believe a word what they tell you on the telly, our (primarily Afrikaner) Nat government were a bunch of morons and screwed up big time, back in the way back when. Demographics is destiny – as you will soon find out. Of course I support the right of return to ancestral homelands but find it v-e-r-y strange… why the White West does not. No jew-talk this, but you are going to have your problems in the good ol’ U.S of A., you are going to have problems coming your way that you cannot even begin to imagine right now and there is sweet Fanny Adams that you, oh hollowcrap, will be able to do about it.

    Sweet Fanny Adams.

  8. Wolf Teilahr says:

    We live in world run by and for the benefit of those who see evil, not as something abhorent, but as a way of life. This vile and corrupt world we now live in serves merely as further proof of this, as it is a “crystal-clear” reflection of their mindset, their desires and lusts, their loathing for all others who are not of their ilk.

    Surely then, to all rational thinking people, when this vile creed point to an individual or group as the one/ones who are evil, then commonsense dictates that the opposite is true? Adolf Hitler and Rudolf Hess were such a men, the complete opposite as leaders of the people to the anti-Christ vermin that now rule supreme.

    Until our White Aryan Race learns once again to embrace National Socialist ideology we are doomed. It is the only ideology that the Khazar Jews still fear to this day, the one political movement in history that brought the Jew World Order to the very precipice of destruction. For those of us who are still foolish enough to cling to, or believe in, the “Democratic process”, please open your eyes to the truth, the obvious facts of the matter.

    Democracy is the “Jews’ joke” on all White nations. An environment where we simply have the illusion of choice, the illusion of freedom. As a friend of mine once remarked, “Democracy? It’s Communism in a push-up bra.”, how right he is. In our great political races to your Whitehouse or our British Parliament it is the Jews who own and control all the runners, the outcome is a foregone conclusion, Jewish Supremacy wins again.

    The choice, ladies and gentlemen, is yours. You can dismiss me as just another “Neo-Nazi”, this will indeed be the easiest option for you and will not require any courage on you part, neither will it effect your social standing with your friends, family or peers. Or, for the sake of your children, grandchildren, everything and everyone you love and hold dear, you can investigate the truth about National Socialism and on finding the truth, share it with and educate others. And oh yes, with the latter option, courage on your part will most certainly be required.

    “And you will know the truth and the truth will set you free.” – John 8:23.

  9. Sally says:

    The Western masses knew nothing of these happenings in British-American-occupied Germany at the time, and might not have objected violently if they had known, for at that period they were still under the influence of wartime propaganda, particularly in the matter of the Nazi concentration camps. They seemed to me completely to have forgotten that the concentration camp was originally a Communist idea, copied by Hitler, and that the further the Red armies were allowed into Europe the more certain its perpetuation became. Their feelings were inflamed by the horrifying news-reel pictures, shown to them on a million screens as the Allied armies entered Germany, of piles of emaciated corpses stacked like firewood in these camps.

    I was a member of those audiences and heard the comments around me with misgiving. Wartime propaganda is the most insidious poison known to man, and I believe these picture-goers of 1945, deprived of truthful information for years, had lost all ability, perhaps all desire to judge what they saw. I think most of them thought the human remains they saw were those of Jews, for this was the suggestion hammered into their minds by the press day by day. They constantly read of “Nazi gas chambers for Jews … Nazi crematoria for Jews,” and few of them in later years troubled to read the stories of inmates and find out who these victims truly were. One instance: a German woman who spent five years in Ravensbruck camp (Frau Margaret Bubers Newmann) says the first victims were the sick or afflicted, or those incapable of work, and the next ones were “the


    inferior races,” among whom the Poles were placed first, and the Czechs, Balts, Hungarians and others next.

    Thus the piles of dead received as little true compassion as the living who were driven back by the Western Allies into the concentration-camp area, and today it may be only a matter of historical interest, pertaining to such a book as this, to show that the “Nazi” concentration camps, at the time when the Anglo-American armies entered Germany, were predominantly under Communist control, that Jews were among the tormentors, and that anti-Communism was a surer qualification for the death-chamber than anti-Hitlerism!

    An eye witness….

    A Judicial Commission was sent to investigate and reported in 1949 that the confessions “admittedly” had been obtained by “the use of mock trials in which one or more persons attired as American officers pretended to preside as judges and others attired in American uniforms pretended to be the prosecutor and defender of the accused.” In consequence some of the death sentences were commuted. The chairman of this commission, Justice Gordon Simpson of Texas, told the Senate Subcommittee that the trial procedures followed were “not American” (they certainly were not British) and had been agreed “at the London Four-Power Conference that fixed the terms of the war crimes trials,” so that responsibility, once more, goes back to the politicians of London and Washington and the groups which exercised pressure on them. Justice Simpson also testified that the American Army “could not find enough qualified Americans” for these war crimes trials, in which the good name of the West was involved, “and therefore had to draw on some of the German refugees.”

    This aspect of the trials was further illuminated by an event of January 1953, when two men were arrested by the American military authorities in occupied Vienna on charges of conspiring with a secretary of the Soviet Embassy in Washington to transmit secret American military documents to the Soviet state. They were both Viennese-born Jews who had reached America in 1938 and 1940, at the ages of 16 and 26. In any previous war they would have been kept under observation as “enemy aliens”; under Mr. Roosevelt they had received American army commissions as “friendly aliens.” In 1945 they were made “members of the American prosecution team at the war crimes trials.” When they were arrested as Communist agents and spies a high official of the American Military Government in Vienna said, “This ties in with information showing that too many of the Americans employed at Nuremberg were either Communists or were


    being used by Communists.” He added that “the American prosecution staff at Nuremberg went off in hundreds of directions when the trials were over, many into the American State Department or the United Nations.”

    At this time the further disclosure was made that in 1949 Mr. John J. McCloy (an American High Commissioner particularly feared by the Germans during the war-crimes trials period) had been given legal briefs “showing that serious errors in translation from German and other languages into English were introduced into evidence; these errors, in some cases, were made by persons whose Communist ties have since been proved by loyalty checks.” This material has never been made public, but if it should ever be used in an impartial investigation of the trials grave embarrassment for the Western leaders would be caused. At the war’s end Communists were everywhere in control of the Nazi concentration camps (as will be shown later in this chapter); in the manner above described they became prosecutors and judges of the very crimes which they had committed!

    On both sides of the line vengeance was wreaked in the same spirit. Mongolian soldiers from the East, as they entered Germany, were incited by the recorded voice of Ilya Ehrenburg, from Moscow, to fall in particular on pregnant women; what else could the rabid injunction mean, not to spare “even unborn Fascists.” An American woman living in Berlin, Mrs. Frances Faviell, described her horror when she read the diary kept by her housekeeper, Lotte, and its description of “the raping of Lotte and thousands of women, even old women of 65, by the filthy Mongol troops, not once but time after time, women with their children clinging to their skirts …” The diary recorded “every date and detail, written by the light of Lotte’s torch, the murders of those who had tried to protect the old women, the apology of the Russian officer who had found the bodies … his explanation to Lotte that the troops had been given forty-eight hours Plunderfreiheit … It was one of the most horrible documents I had ever read and I felt icy cold as I put it down.” Plunderfreiheit; loot-liberty! This was the human result of the political arrangement made, to the drinking of forty-five toasts, at Yalta.

    On the Western side of the line the same vengeance continued. In August 1947 a British M.P., Mr. Nigel Birch, found nearly four thousand Germans still in one concentration camp, held indefinitely without charge or trial. He reported that the first question put to them, if they ultimately came to trial, was always the same: “Did you know the Jews were being persecuted?” The story continued in that vein; no other persecution mattered (and at that time legions of human beings had been driven back to the Soviet terror which they tried to escape).

    The British and American Governments left the Germans in no doubt as to the nature of the vengeance they were exacting. One of the first acts of the Allied High Commissioners was to enact a law “against anti-semitism.” Thus they extended into the West the law which identified the nature of the first Bolshevist administration in Russia, the “law against anti-semitism” introduced on July 27,

    The report spoke of “mock trials” to which the defendants had been brought hooded, with ropes round their necks, and “tried” before mock-altars with crucifixes and candles; they were subjected to brutal treatment in the effort to extort confessions which then could be produced before the real trial (the prisoners were led to believe that the mock-trial was the genuine one).

    The biggest of these trials was the “Malmedy trial” of 1945-1946, at which


    forty-three prisoners were sentenced to death. This trial related to the killing of American prisoners by SS. troops near Malmedy in 1944, and bitter feeling against any proved guilty was to be expected from American prosecutors. However, the tormentors of these prisoners were not Americans, as those who remember the admirable bearing of American troops in Germany after the First World War might expect. They were Jews from Austria who had entered the United States just before the Second War and, under Mr. Roosevelt’s regime, had quickly been taken into the American army and American uniform. A genuine American who was present at these mock-trials (a veteran court reporter) stated that he left the service of the War Crimes Branch in disgust after witnessing the “brutal sadism” practised by one of the inquisitors. Then the chief American prosecutor in this trial, a colonel, admitted to a Senate subcommittee that he had known about the mock-trials; he thought they were proper if the trial court itself was informed of the method used to obtain the defendants’ confessions, and said the prisoners should have known that the black-mass trial was a false one because they were not assigned defence counsel.

    A book that will fill you with rage, Western leaders?
    Bowing down to jews….killing Europeans in the millions!!

    Bnai Brith and the ADL – couldn’t allow DOUGLAS REED’S Truths to become widely known- Brainwashing needed 6 million jews- yet it was Germans that made up 90% of concentration camp inmates.,…6 million jews had to first be in Germany!

    What a bloody hoax!

    Douglas Reeds “The Controversy of Zion” now on the internet!
    Commensing in 1951, as Britains foremost World War II correspondent, he spent more than three years writing “The Controversy of Zion” – all 300.000 words of it. He completed the epilogue in 1956. Although there is correspondence to show that the book was once discussed with his publisher, the manuscript was never submitted, but remained for 22 years gathering dust in his home in Durban, South Africa.
    Would he have loved the internet! Now, half a century later, it exists, and must assist in the dissemination of his powerful truth. Several chapters show how much he would have loved this possibility. Just as much as the zionist censors of the internet hate this breach in their worldwide brainwashing and control of the media.
    In Europe during the years immediately before and after World War II, the name of Douglas Reed was on everyone’s lips. His books were being sold by the tens of thousands. He was known with intimate familiarity throughout the English-speaking world by a vast army of fans. And then he was banished. Was it this book? Take a look at these chapters and judge for yourself…..

    Today I spit on CHURCHILL!

    When I resigned in 1938 I had a second reason, not present in 1933, for perplexity about the way the press is conducted. In that matter, too, I could only assume that some infatuation worked to distort the truthful picture of events. The outcome of the ensuing war, however, showed that a powerful motive had lain behind this particular misrepresentation.

    In the case of “the Jewish persecution” in Germany I found that impartial presentation of the facts gradually gave way to so partisan a depictment that the truth was lost. This transformation was effected in three subtle stages. First the persecution of “political opponents and Jews” was reported; then this was imperceptibly amended to “Jews and political opponents”; and at the end the press in general spoke only of “the persecution of Jews.” By this means a false image was projected on to the public mind and the plight of the overwhelming majority of the victims, by this fixing of the spotlight on one group, was lost to sight. The result showed in 1945, when, on the one hand, the persecution of Jews was made the subject of a formal indictment at Nuremberg, and on the other hand half of Europe and all the people in it were abandoned to the selfsame persecution, in which the Jews had shared in their small proportion to populations everywhere.

    At that period I, typical of Englishmen of my generation, had never thought of Jews as different from myself, nor could I have said what might make a Jew, in his opinion, different from me. If I later became aware of any differentiation, or of the desire of a powerful group to assert one, this was not the result of Hitler’s deeds but of the new impediment to impartial reporting which I then began to observe. When the general persecution began I reported it as I saw it. If I learned of a concentration camp containing a thousand captives I reported this; if I learned that the thousand included thirty or fifty Jews I reported that. I saw the first terror, spoke with many of the victims, examined their injuries, and was warned that I incurred Gestapo hostility thereby. The victims were in the great majority, certainly much over ninety percent, Germans, and a few were Jews. This reflected the population-ratio, in Germany and later in the countries overrun by Hitler. But the manner of reporting in the world’s press in time blocked-out the great suffering mass, leaving only the case of the Jews.

    I illustrate this by episodes and passages from my own experience and reporting. Rabbi Stephen Wise, writing in 1949, gave the following version of events personally reported by me in 1933, and undoubtedly purveyed the same version in the presidential circle of which he was a familiar during those years: “The measures against the Jews continued to outstrip in systematic cruelty and planned destruction the terror against other groups. On January 29, 1933 Hitler was summoned to be chancellor … at once the reign of terror began with beatings and imprisonment of Jews … We planned a protest march in New York on May 10, the day of the ordered burning of Jewish books in Germany … the brunt of the attack was borne by Jews … concentration camps were established


    and filled with Jews.”

    All these statements are false. The measures against the Jews did not outstrip the terror against other groups; the Jews were involved in a much larger number of others. The reign of terror did not begin on January 29, 1933, but in the night of the Reichstag fire, February 27. No “burning of Jewish books” was ordered; I attended and reported that bonfire and have looked up my report published in The Times, to verify my recollection. A mass of “Marxist” books was burned, including the works of many German, English and other non-Jewish writers (my books, had they then been published, would undoubtedly have been among them); the bonfire included some Jewish books. The “brunt” of the terror was not borne by Jews, nor were the concentration camps “filled with Jews.” The number of Jewish victims was in proportion to their ratio of the population.

    Nevertheless this false picture, by iteration, came to dominate the public mind during the Second War. At the time of my resignation, which was provoked solely by the “policy of appeasement” and the imminent advent of “the unnecessary war,” this other hindrance to faithful reporting was but a secondary, minor annoyance. Later I discerned that the motive behind it was of major importance in shaping the course and outcome of the Second War.” When I came to study the story of Mr. Robert Wilton I perceived that there was also a strong resemblance between my experience and his. He sought to explain the nature of an event in Russia and thus was inevitably led into “the Jewish question.” Twenty years later I observed that it was in fact impossible to draw public attention to the misreporting of the nature of the persecution of Germany and to explain that the Jews formed only a small fraction of the victims.

    That matter had nothing to do with my resignation, but I was becoming aware of it around that time, and this widening perception is reflected in the two books which I published after renouncing journalism. The first, Insanity Fair, was devoted entirely to the menace of war. I thought, somewhat vaingloriously, that one voice might still avert it, and today’s reader may still verify that motive. To account for this excess of zeal in me, the indulgent reader, if he be old enough, might recall the feeling of horror which the thought of another world war caused in those who had known the first one. This feeling can never be fully comprehended by those of later generations, who have become familiar with the thought of a series of wars, but it was overpowering at the time.

    The second book, Disgrace Abounding, on the eve of war continued the warning theme, but in it, for the first time, I gave some attention to “the Jewish question.” My experience was widening and I had begun to discern the major part it would play in forming the shape and issue of the Second War which then was clearly at hand. My thought from then on was much given to it; in this way I came in time to write the present book and in that light the remaining chapters on the brewing, course and aftermath of the Second War, are written.

    Still to this day jewish wars fought by Gentile’s…. lead by ZOG across the Western World.

    From 1927 on I reported the rise of Hitler, and by chance was passing the Reichstag when it burst into flames in 1933. This event (used to set up the secret-police-and-concentration-camp system in Germany, on the Bolshevist model) cemented Hitler in power, but some prescience, that night, told me that it meant much more than that. In fact the present unfinished ordeal of the West dates from that night, not from the later war. Its true meaning was that the area of occupation of the world-revolution spread to the middle of Europe, and the actual transfer to Communist ownership in 1945 merely confirmed an accomplished fact (theretofore disguised from the masses by the bogus antagonism between National Socialism and Communism) which the war, at its outset, was supposed to undo. The only genuine question which the future has yet to answer is whether the world-revolution will be driven back or spread further westward from the position which, in effect, it occupied on the night of February 27, 1933.

    Douglas Reed silenced for many years by Bnai Brith and the ADL!!

  10. Sally says:

    Jewish revenge on Germany

    Another eye witness…Gen Patton On Jews And Germans.

    Norwegian MP Has Had Enough of Multi-Culturalism – Whos behind it?

    May 2011

  11. Sally says:

    History denied to us here in the Free West- Free under jewish rule- as were the Hungarians in 1956!

    An Eye for an Eye: The Story of Jews Who Sought Revenge for the Holocaust (Paperback)
    Horrifying account of atrocities committed against German civilians by Jews in the aftermath of World War II. Long-suppressed story — by a fearless Jewish author and noted journalist — of how Jews of the Polish Communist “Office of State Security” killed and brutally mistreated many tens of thousands of German men, women and children in concentration camps and prisons in conquered German territories. This story was featured on a “60 Minutes” broadcast segment. Antony Polonsky, Prof. of E. European Jewish History at Brandeis University, comments on An Eye for An Eye: “… Extremely gripping and compelling account of the appalling events which accompanied the end of the war and the expulsion of the Germans … impossible to put down … a major contribution to our understanding

    An Eye for an Eye: The Story of Jews Who Sought Revenge for the Holocaust (Paperback)
    Great book…what I want to know is why can’t the facist-loser whiners writing reviews on this site realize that anti-German atrocities were a direct result of GERMAN-PERPETRATED ATROCITIES? Do they think this happened in some kind of vacuum?Place responsibility where responsibility lies. One caused the other. Also, German atrocities were perpetrated by Germans wearing the uniform of Germany, these Jews who worked the Soviets weren’t representing the Jewish people…they were only representing their individual grudges (i.e. seeing their whole family murdered). The Commies knew to use individual Jews because they knew Holocaust survivors would make great anti-Germans–duh!

    An Eye for an Eye: The Story of Jews Who Sought Revenge for the Holocaust (Paperback)
    A sneaky attempt to whitewash history. When Germans commit atrocities against Jews, they’re the epitomy of evil; when Jews commit atrocities against Germans, it’s an “eye for an eye”. The message: Jews can do no harm.

    This is a German American- his review should be read by all- it’s too long -will place the link in comment section-

    Here is the jist of it.

    Unlike the Nazis, who are hunted the world over and are dragged before courts even in their 80?s, no one hunts for these Jews, and few have ever been prosecuted. (145). For thirty years, the German government knew of the crimes of Shlomo Morel, but never said a word about it. (146). A Polish prosecutor trying to charge Morel sent documents to a German to translate them into Polish. (167). The documents incriminated Morel but, to stop the cycle of revenge, the German told the prosecutor, “There’s nothing important here,” and told 235 survivors of Morel’s prison to say nothing. (167, 173). Today, Morel lives safely in Israel, which kidnaps suspected Nazi war criminals from other countries and tries them in Israel; Israel does not, however, extradite its own war criminals. The Polish government even owes Morel a pension, but he has to go back to Poland to get it. (166).

    There are no memorial museums for the German victims of this holocaust and no Jewish school children are taught what these Jews did. As I write this, there are historians sitting in European prisons for questioning the Jewish Holocaust, but no one is sitting in prison for denying the genocidal torture and murder of Germans by Jews after the war was over.

    There are several lessons to be learned from this book. The most obvious one is, “Don’t get caught in any territory controlled by Jews.” Since “Most Jews from the Office went to America” (150) and Jews now occupy many important positions in our government, I frankly worry about my safety here, especially with Michael Chertoff, the grandson of Russian Jews, running Homeland Security. Russian Jews brutally tortured and killed millions of Russians, mostly peasants (Solzhenitsyn, “Two Hundred Years Together”), even using exhaust-fed gas chambers mounted on trucks.
    All in all, despite how distressing it is to read this book, it is a book that should be read.

    Despite my criticisms in this review, I nevertheless highly recommend it. It is about a subject that is historically important, but known to almost no one, and it is a compelling story that grips the reader from the beginning to the end.

    I shall be purchasing this book tonight!!

    Still bothers me alot- why has this history been denied to us?

  12. Sally says:

    What will be around the corner for all White folks’ should they fail to wake from their slumber…..Bolshavism waiting in the wings!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.