A Revisionist Response to the Pro-Jewish Distortions of Anthony J. Hall and Joshua Blakeney
A so-called anti-Zionist, Joshua Blakeney and a so-called truth seeker, Anthony J. Hall, spout Jewish propaganda and support Jewish agendas
I recently became acquainted with two outspoken 9/11 truth personalities named Anthony J. Hall and Joshua Blakeney. Hall is a professor of globalization studies at the University of Lethbridge, and Joshua Blakeney is his student, as well as a 9/11 truth activist and staff writer for VeteransToday.com. Blakeney has written a number of good articles criticizing Zionism and Israel within which he rightly implicates Israel in 9/11 (as I did over two years ago). Professor Hall is less outspoken about Zionism or Israel, and appears to be along the lines of an Alex Jones-style paytriotard who clamors about Nazis and Fascists and mysterious “global elites” that nobody can quite put their finger on.
Professor Anthony J. Hall: A Groveling Judeophile
From reading some of his writings and listening to some of his interviews on radio programs, I have ascertained that Professor Anthony J. Hall is a paytriotard, i.e. a politically correct “truther.” These type of truthers are ignoramuses who avoid talking about Jews like the plague (as they have been specially trained to do by the Zionist media) and generally blame everything bad on “right wing elites,” “Fascist globalists,” “Nazis,” and other conjured bogeymen. This type of nonsense, which is trumpeted by the likes of Zionist agent Alex Jones, serves the Jewish Power Elite expertly because it firstly re-enforces the Zionist touted myth that the Nazis (and anyone else who opposes Jewish domination) are “evil-doers,” and secondly it makes it look like the enemies of the Jews are behind the NWO (i.e. “Nazis”) when the real and obvious architects of the NWO are Jews and Zionists, of course. This misleads unsuspecting truthers into adopting a Pro-Zionist position instead of an anti-Zionist one. Many less intelligent folks who are easily led are often-times taken in by this pernicious propaganda, causing them to join ranks with the very people seeking to destroy our world.
In a video posted to Youtube , Hall identifies a man named Tooker Gomberg as his “teacher” and “close associate.” Gomberg appears to be a radical environmentalist who “was born August 12, 1955 in Montreal, Quebec into a Jewish family of high achievers.” So he had a Jewish, perhaps Zionist, close associate. Maybe this is where his pro-Jewish leanings first originated.
In an article published on 911blogger.com written by Anthony J. Hall entitled A Clash of Conspiracy Theories: Reflections on the Decision to Disqualify Lesley Hughes from Running as a Liberal Candidate in the Canadian Election of 2008 , Professor Hall unveils more of his Jewish ties and sympathies. In the 11th paragraph of the article he is lavishly singing the praises of the Canadian Jewish-Zionist media magnates, the Asper Family, and the “old and illustrious Jewish community of Winnipeg.” Professor Hall opines, “In my view Cy Gonig’s connection to Canadian Dimension is as significant an aspect of Canadian intellectual history as is the relationship of the Winnipeg-based Asper family to their Can West Global media empire. As I see both Gonig and the Aspers epitomize the continuing vitality and importance of old and illustrious Jewish community of Winnipeg.” [emphasis added] Eulogizing Zionist gangster media oligarchs like the Aspers, how quaint. In the 12th paragraph Hall admits actually having “worked” with members of the uber Zionist Asper family, including the (now deceased) emissary of Zion in Canada Israel “Izzy” Asper himself. He writes:
“Since almost the time when Louis Riel’s Metis settlement of Red River merged into the post-CPR metropolis of Winnipeg, the Jewish community in Manitoba’s great capital has given Canada some of its most of important movers and shakers in the worlds of show business, commerce, the law, academia, and political activism. I am proud of the mark I have made myself in Winnipeg’s intellectual life. Between 1987 and 1990 I worked with Izzy Asper [the Jewish-Zionist media mogul], Phil Fontaine and others in developing and publicizing some of the underlying analysis that eventually resulted in Elijah Harper’s being able to block the Meech Lake accord at the Manitoba Legislature. I have been a frequent contributor to Canadian Dimension and I have worked along with a gifted team of colleagues from across Canada to help Gail Asper and a New York-based consulting firm to develop suitable content for the great pride of Winnipeg, the soon-to-be-built Canadian Museum for Human Rights.” [emphasis added]
So Hall has admittedly rubbed shoulders with Zio-Maniacs Izzy and Gail Asper — that can’t be a good sign.
Hall’s “A Clash of Conspiracy Theories” article is generally about Zionist Jews from Canada who were all up in a tizzy, kvetching about a Canadian politician named Leslie Hughes who, in an article or blog, mentioned that an Israeli company called ZIM Shipping pulled out of the WTC one week before 9/11 (which is true). Not only did the Mossad front company ZIM Shipping pull out of the Jewish-owned and controlled WTC complex but the Israeli Mossad and its vast network of Zionist Sayanim operatives orchestrated the whole attack from top to bottom. For having the audacity to state one simple fact about 9/11 zealous Jews harried and hounded this woman until she was denounced and fired from her political party.
Hall quotes a spokeswoman for the racist Zionist spy agency, the Canadian Jewish Congress, who said, “there is no place in Canada for 9/11 Jewish conspiracy theories.” How Orwellian, a Jew declaring what Canadians are or are not allowed to think. Only Zionist-penned, Kosher-approved Muslim and Nazi conspiracy theories are allowed to be heard in Canada if this Zionist conspirator were to have her way. Amazingly, Hall actually expresses his agreement with this evil Zionist criminal; he writes, “I agree with the CJC’s contention insofar as we must strive to prevent ethnic or religious prejudices from colouring our interpretations of, and responses to, the assaults on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon seven years ago.”
The paragraph to follow looks like it could have been written by the über Zionist schemer, the ADL’s Abe Foxman himself. Professor Hall shamelessly engages in an epic groveling philosemitic diatribe laden with buttressing buzz words. It appears he heartily enjoys brown-nosing the Zionists and spouting their holocaust propaganda — as if they needed any help disseminating that garbage. Professor Hall squawks:
“The term “Jewish conspiracy theory” quite properly conjures up terrible memories of Auschwitz, Hitler’s anti-Semitic ravings, yellow stars, and Henry Ford’s obsessive dissemination of the ultimate literary prod to racial hatred, the so-called Protocols of the Zion Elders. The heritage of the Holocaust stands as the classic demonstration of the fragility and contingency of the West’s claim to the decency of its civilization. We must never forget the very old legacy of religious and ethnic violence culminating in the industrialized genocide of 6,000,000 European Jews sent to their slaughter by fascist regimes throughout Europe. This travesty, it must be underlined, took place well within the lifetimes of many people still on this planet today.”
Holocaust. Auschwitz. Six Million. Hitler. Anti-Semitic ravings. The Protocols. Oy vey! When did Abe Foxman stop writing and Professor Hall begin writing? Jewish conspiracies are forbidden to discuss but Muslim or Christian conspiracies are perfectly okay to promote in this Jewish-engineered politically-correct paradigm of psychological enslavement. Hall discredits himself completely in this short paragraph by mindlessly parroting a number of easily disproved “Big Lies.” There are so many falsehoods, where shall I ever begin? First Hall remarks, “the ultimate literary prod to racial hatred, the so-called Protocols of the Zion Elders.” If the Protocols Of Zion are the “ultimate literary prod to racial hatred,” then why doesn’t Mr. Hall ask Jews why they penned the Protocols in the first place if they don’t want people to dislike them for it? He is naively assuming here that we are all ignorant enough to blindly accept the Zionist-heralded conspiracy theory that the Protocols were written by “antisemites” who hate Jews instead of by Jews who hate Gentiles. Indeed, the Protocols of Zion do promote racial hatred… of Gentiles, or Goyeem (cattle) as the Jewish Supremacists refer to us as not only in the Protocols but in the Torah, Talmud, Mishnah, books of the Zohar and all ancient Judaic religious texts.
Moreover, it certainly appears to me that “Professor” Hall isn’t very well read if he thinks the Protocols are the “ultimate literary prod to racial hatred.” The most vile, racist, satanic book of hate on earth hands down is the Babylonian Talmud, a book codified over a period of three centuries by racist, supremacist, hate-filled Jewish Rabbis between the second and fifth century A.D. The following are a few such examples of hate-speech from the Talmud and from Jews who adhere to its racist teachings, as exposed in Michael Hoffman’s excellent book “Judaism’s Strange Gods” :
“Where a Jew Should Do Evil”
Moed Kattan 17a: If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there.
Penalty for Disobeying Rabbis
Erubin 21b. Whosoever disobeys the rabbis deserves death and will be punished by being boiled in hot excrement in hell.
Hitting a Jew is the same as hitting God
Sanhedrin 58b. If a heathen (gentile) hits a Jew, the gentile must be killed.
O.K. to Cheat Non-Jews
Sanhedrin 57a . A Jew need not pay a gentile (“Cuthean”) the wages owed him for work.
Jews Have Superior Legal Status
Baba Kamma 37b. “If an ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite there is no liability; but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite…the payment is to be in full.”
Jews May Steal from Non-Jews
Baba Mezia 24a . If a Jew finds an object lost by a gentile (“heathen”) it does not have to be returned. (Affirmed also in Baba Kamma 113b). Sanhedrin 76a. God will not spare a Jew who “marries his daughter to an old man or takes a wife for his infant son or returns a lost article to a Cuthean…”
Jews May Rob and Kill Non-Jews
Sanhedrin 57a . When a Jew murders a gentile (“Cuthean”), there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a gentile he may keep.
Baba Kamma 37b. The gentiles are outside the protection of the law and God has “exposed their money to Israel.”
Jews May Lie to Non-Jews
Baba Kamma 113a. Jews may use lies (“subterfuges”) to circumvent a Gentile.
Non-Jewish Children are Sub-Human
Yebamoth 98a. All gentile children are animals.
Abodah Zarah 36b. Gentile girls are in a state of niddah (filth) from birth.
Abodah Zarah 22a-22b . Gentiles prefer sex with cows.
Insults Against Blessed Mary
Sanhedrin 106a . Says Jesus’ mother was a whore: “She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters.” Also in footnote #2 to Shabbath 104b of the Soncino edition, it is stated that in the “uncensored” text of the Talmud it is written that Jesus mother, “Miriam the hairdresser,” had sex with many men.
Gloats over Christ Dying Young
A passage from Sanhedrin 106 gloats over the early age at which Jesus died: “Hast thou heard how old Balaam (Jesus) was? — He replied: It is not actually stated but since it is written, Bloody and deceitful men shall not live out half their days it follows that he was thirty-three or thirty-four years old.”
Genocide Advocated by the Talmud
Minor Tractates. Soferim 15, Rule 10. This is the saying of Rabbi Simon ben Yohai: Tob shebe goyyim harog (“Even the best of the gentiles should all be killed”).
This passage is from the original Hebrew of the Babylonian Talmud as quoted by the 1907 Jewish Encyclopedia, published by Funk and Wagnalls and compiled by Isidore Singer, under the entry, “Gentile,” (p. 617).
This original Talmud passage has been concealed in translation. The Jewish Encyclopedia states that, “…in the various versions the reading has been altered, ‘The best among the Egyptians’ being generally substituted.” In the Soncino version: “the best of the heathens” (Minor Tractates, Soferim 41a-b].
Israelis annually take part in a national pilgrimage to the grave of Simon ben Yohai, to honor this rabbi who advocated the extermination of non-Jews. (Jewish Press, June 9, 1989, p. 56B).
On Purim, Feb. 25, 1994, Israeli army officer Baruch Goldstein, an orthodox Jew from Brooklyn, massacred 40 Palestinian civilians, including children, while they knelt in prayer in a mosque. Goldstein was a disciple of the late Brooklyn Rabbi Meir Kahane, who told CBS News that his teaching that Arabs are “dogs” is derived “from the Talmud.” (CBS 60 Minutes, “Kahane”).
University of Jerusalem Prof. Ehud Sprinzak described Kahane and Goldstein’s philosophy: “They believe it’s God’s will that they commit violence against goyim, a Hebrew term for non-Jews.” (NY Daily News, Feb. 26, 1994, p. 5).
Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg declared, “We have to recognize that Jewish blood and the blood of a goy are not the same thing.” (NY Times, June 6, 1989, p.5).
Besides the Talmud, one of the most egregious examples of genocidal hate literature that I’m sure Professor Hall has never heard of was a book published in 1941, that is before America entered WWII, by an American Jew named Theodore N. Kaufman. The book was called Germany Must Perish! and in this hate-filled text the Jew Kaufman calls for the genocide through sterilization of all Germans and the wiping of Germany off the face of the earth! Here are relevant quotes from the book:
“This dynamic volume outlines a comprehensive plan for the extinction of the German nation and the total eradication from the earth, of all her people. Also contained herein is a map illustrating the possible territorial dissection of Germany and the apportionment of her lands.
A final solution: Let Germany be policed forever by an international armed force? Even if such a huge undertaking were feasible life itself would not have it so. As war begets war, suppression begets rebellion. Undreamed horrors would unfold. Thus we find that there is no middle course; no act of mediation, no compromise to be compounded, no political or economic sharing to be considered. There is, in fine, no other solution except one: That Germany must perish forever from this earth!“
Why is the world largely unaware of this Jewish “Final Solution” to German people? The world is likewise kept in the dark about the Jewish “Final Solution” to Russian people. In 1919 Jewish Communist butcher Grigory Zinoviev (Radomyslsky) is quoted in a speech advocating the annihilation of 10 million Russians.  One might ask: is Professor Hall just oblivious to all these examples of (to use his words) “literary prod to racial hatred” emanating from the lips and pen tips of Judaics?
As if that was not enough to blow out of the water the good Professor’s laughable inference that the Protocols of Zion are the “ultimate literary prod to racial hatred,” one more example of genocidal Jewish hate-speech should suffice to bury Professor Hall’s “Big Lie” about the Protocols.
Ilya Ehrenburg, (pictured) was a notorious Jewish propagandist from the USSR who agitated for genocide against Germans during the second world war.  His hate-filled, genocide-yearning exhortations to the Soviet Red Army inspired the mass rape of several million German women by the Red Army at the war’s end. 
In one leaflet entitled “Kill,” Ehrenburg incited the simple Russian soldier to treat the Germans as subhuman. The final paragraph concludes:
“The Germans are not human beings. From now on, the word ‘German’ is the most horrible curse. From now on, the word ‘German’ strikes us to the quick. We have nothing to discuss. We will not get excited. We will kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day … If you cannot kill a German with a bullet, then kill him with your bayonet. If your part of the front is quiet and there is no fighting, then kill a German in the meantime … If you have already killed a German, then kill another one – there is nothing more amusing to us than a heap of German corpses. Don’t count the days, don’t count the kilometers. Count only one thing: the number of Germans you have killed. Kill the Germans! … – Kill the Germans! Kill!”
Appealing to the lowest, most subhuman instincts of this Bolshevik horde, he reiterated his genocidal message:
“Kill! Kill! In the German race there is nothing but evil; not one among the living, not one among the yet unborn but is evil! Follow the precepts of Comrade Stalin. Stamp out the fascist beast once and for all in its lair! Use force and break the racial pride of these German women. Take them as your lawful booty. Kill! As you storm onward, kill, you gallant soldiers of the Red Army.”
Where is Professor Hall’s condemnation of this genocide-advocating Jewish, anti-Gentile hate-speech?
Professor Hall Embraces Discredited Holocaust Propaganda
Professor Hall’s failure to cite the many examples of venomous Jewish hate screeds directed against Gentiles confirms his clear bias in favor of the Jews. In Professor Hall’s article  he espouses the belief that: “We must never forget the very old legacy of religious and ethnic violence culminating in the industrialized genocide of 6,000,000 European Jews sent to their slaughter by fascist regimes throughout Europe.” The obscene falsity of this statement is vomit worthy. He theatrically recites the phony Zionist Hollywood Holocaust script like a choir boy singing Christmas carols on Christmas Eve. It is blatantly obvious that Professor Hall has not read one single revisionist article or revisionist book. If he had he wouldn’t blindly spout such discredited nonsense.
For starters, the “Six Million” figure and story originated as a Judaic religious prophecy that prophesied “Six Million Jews” vanishing before the Jews could reclaim the land of Israel, which they accomplished after WWII.  The cabalisitc 6,000,000 figure that we are all so familiar with has been used by Jewish-Zionist propagandists continuously before, during and after World War I. See Don Heddesheimer’s excellent book The First Holocaust which delves into fraudulent Pre-WWII holocaust claims and Jewish fund-raising campaigns associated with those claims.
For example, in the year 1900 Rabbi Stephen Wise, a leading Zionist figure and co-founder of the World Jewish Congress, outlined the entire Zionist holocaust agenda in one sentence when he said “There are 6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism.”  An astonishing admittance that the 6,000,000 suffering Jews story would be used as a propaganda tool to promote sympathy for Zionism, i.e. the creation of a Jewish State in Palestine. In 1906 the New York Times reported that the Russian Government had a “solution to the Jewish question” which would result in the “murderous extermination of 6,000,000 Jews.”  In 1919, shortly after WWI, the 40th Governor of New York Martin H. Glynn, published an article in the American Hebrew Magazine entitled The Crucifixion of Jews Must Stop! in which he alleges that a “Holocaust of Six Million Jews” was imminent in Europe.  Again in 1919 the New York Times reports in an article entitled, Ukrainian Jews Aim to Stop Pogroms, that 6,000,000 Jews in the Ukraine and Poland are on the verge of being exterminated in pogroms.  In 1921 the New York Times once again asserts that 6,000,000 Jews were being exterminated in Russia.  These claims persisted well into the 1930’s and of course hastened during WWII (See my detailed time-line for dozens more examples) No historian today contends that any of these alleged “holocausts” of Jews occurred. It was all just hysterical propaganda designed to whip up support for Jewish charitable causes and, in my view, to conceal real Jewish-perpetrated atrocities — such as the massacres carried on by Jewish Bolshevik revolutionists in Russia and Eastern Europe. Is it just coincidental that this old, recycled atrocity propaganda later became the official story of “The Holocaust™” after the Second World War? I hardly think so.
Moreover, the oft-repeated cabalistic 6,000,000 figure was discredited some 20 years ago (Professor Hall doesn’t know this because the Jewish media didn’t give any attention to it and that’s where he gets all his information about WWII). It was originally claimed that 4,000,000 people died at Auschwitz, and this figure was supposedly “proved” at the grotesquely fraudulent Stalinist show trial known as the “Nuremberg Trials.” However, in 1989 the Auschwitz State Museum officially revised that figure down to 1 million or perhaps 1.5 million (both Jews and Non-Jews)–they aren’t quite sure themselves because they’re just making it up as they go along.  Regardless, that’s at least 2,500,000 people erased from the official death toll overnight! Where did all these people go? Well, they never existed! They were a total fabrication by the “virtuous Allies.” Despite this we still hear the raucous Zionist cries of “never forget the six million!”
Since we now know they grossly lied about the original 4,000,000 dead at Auschwitz figure, who’s to say the new “revised” figure of 1 million isn’t also wildly inaccurate? Holocaust Revisionists conclude just that. Most serious Revisionists conclude that somewhere between 69,000 and 150,000 people died at Auschwitz from all causes, mostly disease and starvation brought on by the obliteration of German supply lines in Allied bombing raids. This is based on the Auschwitz death books released to the Soviet Archives in 1989 , the reports of the International Red Cross who inspected the camps, and other evidence. Aerial reconnaissance photographs taken over Auschwitz-Birkenau by American pilots on random days in 1944–during the height of the alleged “extermination” period there–show nothing out of the ordinary (no smoking crematory chimney’s, no piles of corpses, no masses of Jews lined up awaiting death), therefore discrediting extermination claims. 
The death toll at Auschwitz was not the only one that was later officially revised by a substantial amount. In the 1963 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica it was stated, “At Mauthausen, one of the extermination camps in Austria, close to 2000000 people, mostly Jews, were exterminated between 1941 and 1945.”  Today Mauthausen is no longer considered an ‘extermination camp’ and the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum website now reads : “An estimated 197,464 prisoners passed through the Mauthausen camp system between August 1938 and May 1945. At least 95,000 died there. More than 14,000 were Jewish.” [emphasis added] So it is now alleged that only 95,000 people (14,000 of whom were Jews) perished in that camp from disease and starvation. An exaggeration of 1,905,000!
The original Nuremberg Trial indictment charged the Nazis with murdering 1,500,000 people at Majdanek, a camp in Poland.  This absurd figure was conjured by a Zionist propagandist named Saul Hayes who was on the payroll of the Canadian Jewish Congress.  It has now been officially revised to 79,000.  An exaggeration of 1,421,000! Revisionists arrive at an even lower figure of between 42,500 to 50,000.
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum website claims that “the Germans murdered at least 3 million Jewish citizens of Poland.” On August 29, 1943, it was reported in the Sunday Morning Star that “one million eight hundred thousand Jews were saved by evacuation into the interior of the Soviet Union.” Therefore it is physically impossible that anywhere near 3,000,000 Polish Jews were murdered considering nearly two third’s of them had been evacuated into Russia and were thus beyond the reach of the German invaders. Likewise, the World Jewish Congress published a book about themselves in 1948 called Unity In Dispersion: A History of the World Jewish Congress within which they admit that most of Germany’s 600,000 Jews had emigrated out of Germany before hostilities broke out in 1939. And there were still Jews alive in Germany after the war claiming to be “holocaust survivors.” The familiar claims of 6,000,000 Jewish victims cannot be reconciled in light of these facts.
It has now been acknowledged that the “gas chamber” shown to tourists in Auschwitz I main camp is a fake that was concocted three years after the war by the Communists for propaganda purposes.  For decades the Auschwitz camp tour guides had misled visitors by telling them it was in “original state.” (See Jewish revisionist David Cole’s film on Auschwitz lies).
A glaring truth that flies in the face of the traditional interpretation that Auschwitz was an “extermination camp” were the facilities contained within the camp. Unknown to most people is the undeniable fact that Auschwitz had a swimming pool located in the inmates side of the camp. Prisoners held swimming races as well as water polo matches.  Auschwitz also had a cinema where inmates got to watch films from time to time. It had a post office with twice weekly pick ups and deliveries, a library, a maternity ward where female inmates actually gave birth, state-of-the-art kitchen facilities, religious facilities, a brothel, an artist’s studio and a hospital where surgeries were administered on injured or ailing inmates. There were camp dentists who ensured the dental health of the inmates. There was a theater where actor inmates performed skits, plays and organized musical ensembles. There was also a soccer field where inmates happily enjoyed soccer matches and, according to testimony from former inmates, were even joined by SS officers in some games.  Camp money existed and inmates could buy things like cigarettes at a shop. The camp even had a sauna. These camps were run like small towns or cities.  Ask yourself: what’s more likely, that the Nazis built all of these vast facilities to “disguise” an extermination center or that it was simply what it appeared to be–a labor camp to house workers for the nearby factory which produced synthetic rubber, medical and armament supplies where the inmates are known to have worked? The sign on the front of the camp read “Arbeit Macht Frei” which means “Work Makes You Free.”
Another interesting fact that cannot be reconciled with the traditional holocaust story is the fact that several Nazi SS camp officials were punished by their SS superiors for mistreating inmates. Konrad Morgen was a Nazi SS judge and investigator who prosecuted German camp administrators and guards. One of his more notable investigations was that of Buchenwald camp. After an eight month long investigation into allegations of abuse and corruption by SS officials running the camp, it was determined that 3-4 inmates had been killed by the SS commandant years previous. For that Morgen sentenced the Buchenwald camp commandant, Karl Koch, and his top deputy, to death. Morgen described his investigations in his own words at the Nuremberg trials, he said: “I investigated about 800 cases, that is, about 800 documents, and one document would affect several cases. About 200 were tried during my activity. Five concentration camp commanders were arrested by me personally. Two were shot after being tried.”  And these Nazi camp officials were executed by their own government not for having killed hundreds or thousands of inmates, but just three or four!
Atrocity propaganda is utilized by governments to whip up support for wars. Anti-German atrocity propaganda was rampant throughout WWII. Atrocity lies that had been used by the British and American governments during WWI were resurrected and used again in WWII.  During WWI British Newspapers accused the Germans of a series of obscene crimes: gouging out the eyes of civilians, cutting off the hands of teenage boys, raping and sexually mutilating women, giving children hand grenades to play with, bayoneting babies and the crucifixion of captured soldiers. They also claimed that the Germans used the cadavers of their own fallen soldiers to produce soap. All of these lies were discredited after the war. Similarly during WWII it was authoritatively claimed that the Nazis used the fat of dead Jews to make soap, and their skin to make lampshades, also known as the “soap and lampshades” story. This was allegedly “proved” at the Nuremberg Trials. The Soviets literally submitted into evidence a bar of soap claiming it to be made of Jewish fat. In 1990 the soap story was officially declared to be false and exposed as a total lie. After the war a Jewish-dominated US military PSYOPS team set up a display table at Buchenwald (pictured below) supposedly showcasing a lampshade made from human skin, shrunken heads, and other items said to be made from human body parts. It was all a big hoax, part of a larger Allied/Jewish propaganda campaign to “denazify” the German populace by demonizing their Nazi leaders. (Watch: Buchenwald A Dumb Dumb Portrayal of Evil).
Many extermination claims that were once widely accepted have been quietly abandoned over the years. For years it was claimed that Jews were killed in “gas chambers” at Buchenwald, Dachau and other camps in Germany proper. That part of the story was dropped decades ago. Even the famed “Nazi hunter” and pathological liar, Simon Wiesenthal, admitted “there were no extermination camps on German soil.”
During the war years the Allies claimed that 22 German camps were “death camps.” After the camps were liberated that figure was reduced to just six camps, only the ones located in Poland. As revisionist Mark Weber put it, “Prominent Holocaust historians now claim that large numbers of Jews were gassed at just six camps in what is now Poland: Auschwitz, Majdanek, Treblinka, Sobibor, Chelmno and Belzec. However, the evidence presented for gassings at these six camps is not qualitatively different than the now-discredited “evidence” for alleged “gassings” at camps in Germany proper.”  [emphasis added]
Other absurd claims that were at one time seriously held to be true asserted that Jews were killed in the camps by steam and electricity. US officials at Nuremberg charged that the Germans had killed Jews at Treblinka, not in gas chambers, as is now claimed, but by steaming them to death in “steam chambers.”  Boris Polevoi, a Russian-Jewish writer and Pravda correspondent, propagated the story that Jews were murdered at Auschwitz by means of electrocution. Polevoi’s early report of what allegedly went on in Auschwitz published in the Soviet press asserted: “the traces of electric conveyor belt, on which hundreds of people were simultaneously electrocuted, their bodies falling onto the slow moving conveyor belt which carried them to the blast furnace where they fell in … their bones converted to meal in the rolling mills, and then sent to the surrounding fields.”  A Hungarian Jew named Stefan Szende published a book in Sweden in 1944 called The Promise Hitler Kept which alleged that millions of Jews had been killed at Belzec, a camp in Poland, not by gas, but by electrocution. This allegation was repeated by the Soviet prosecutors at the Nuremberg Trials and repeated in other Jewish publications. That part of the story has been completely dropped; it is now universally claimed that the killing method used in the so-called “holocaust” was “gassing.” 
A lot of these fraudulent and false stories were cooked up by two Jewish Communist propagandists Ilya Ehrenburg (who had announced that 6,000,000 Jews had been killed months before the war even ended) and Vassily Grossman. They, along with the Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee and organized American Jewry, put together “The Black Book,” a work of pure fiction inundated with all the familiar crap about skin lampshades, human soap, steam chambers, electrocution conveyor belts, gas chambers, jew bone powder used for construction and more.  The Nuremberg Show Trials gave credence to many of these evil lies. The Allied governments actually claimed to have “proven” many of these now-discredited stories at Nuremberg. They even blamed the massacre of over 20,000 captured Polish military officers in the Katyn forest on the Nazis at this complete joke of a “trial.”  The Russian government acknowledged in 1990 that the Katyn massacre had been the handiwork of Stalin’s NKVD.
The kangaroo court at Nuremberg was tantamount to an ancient Jewish Sanhedrin court. U.S. Senator Thomas Dodd who was executive trial councilor at Nuremberg was quoted as saying, “this staff [at Nuremberg] is about seventy-five percent Jewish.”  The utter farcical nature of the trial was supremely illustrated by the fact that the presiding Soviet judge was Iona Nikitchenko who had presided over some of Stalin’s most notorious show trials during the Great Purges of 1936-1938, such as those of Kamenev and Zinoviev.  One of the charges brought against several German officials included conspiracy to commit aggression against Poland in 1939. The secret protocols of the German-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact of August 23, 1939, proposed the partition of Poland between Germany and the USSR (which was subsequently carried out in September of 1939 when the Germans and Soviets both invaded Poland). However, Soviet leaders were not tried for being part of the same conspiracy. Instead, the Tribunal falsely proclaimed that the Secret Protocols of the German-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact to be a forgery! Moreover, Allied Powers Britain and the Soviet Union were not tried for preparing the Anglo-Soviet invasion of Iran or the Winter War (Soviet attack on Finland in 1939). Nahum Goldmann, long time president of the World Jewish Congress, admitted in his book The Jewish Paradox that the Nuremberg Tribunal and German reparations payments had been cooked up by two Lithuanian Jewish jurists years before the end of the war. They intended the reparations to finance Jewish settlement in Palestine after the war.
Crucially, the six camps in Poland that are still alleged to have been “extermination camps” had come under Soviet control at the end of the war. Are you honestly going to trust the Communist butchers to provide an accurate, non-partisan account of what went on in the German camps they captured? These are the same people who had already murdered tens of millions of people in death camps (Gulags) of their own going back to 1917. The Reds refused to allow inspections of these six camps for many years after the war, and continued to run many of these camps as Soviet concentration camps where tens of thousands of Germans were imprisoned and were murdered. In addition to running many formerly German camps as Soviet camps Stalin built an additional 1,255 concentration camps where tens of thousands of German civilians and POWs were slaughtered. It is attested in the book An Eye For An Eye by John Sack  (who is Jewish) that Stalin specifically placed Jews in charge of these camps because he knew they would have no mercy on their German subjects. Jewish Commandants brutally murdered and tortured tens of thousands of Germans in these camps. One such Jewish murderer was Saloman Morel, a Communist camp commandant in Poland who exterminated 1500 Germans; women and babies were among his victims. Upon the release of John Sack’s book the Polish government was going to charge Morel with war crimes, but he had already fled the country to Israel. The Israelis protected him and refused to extradite him back to Poland to face trial. 
Overshadowed and drowned out by the monolithic voice of the Holocaust Industry is the fact that every country involved in WWII interned people in concentration camps. Ethnic Germans, Italians, Japanese, Ukrainians and others whose country of origin was aligned with the Axis Powers, were stripped of their homes, belongings, businesses, separated from their families, and interned in concentration camps in the United States, Canada, England, France, Russia, Australia and so on. Not only did Allied countries erect concentration camps on their own soil, but they set up and ran camps on foreign soil during and after the war. A book titled Clinching the Victory published in 1943 spoke of a “Final Solution” to the “Japanese-Canadian problem.”  Likewise, “the final solution to the Jewish question” is a direct quote from the 1897 Zionist Manifesto.  People mistakenly believe the Nazis invented that phrase when, in reality, the Zionists did.
Canadian writer James Baque’s two books Crimes and Mercies and Other Losses uncover the monstrous atrocities inflicted upon German people after WWII. Bacque’s courageous works calculate that as many as 10 million Germans needlessly perished after the war in a largely deliberate Allied policy of extermination between 1945-1950.  On the post-war Allied Holocaust of Germans revisionist scholar Michael Hoffman commented, “this was worse than any ‘holocaust’ caused by the Nazis in wartime, for this was post-war genocide after total surrender, against a completely prostrate people.”  The arch-villain of the post-war holocaust of Germans was the influential Jewish-American politician Henry Morgenthau Jr., who spearheaded the effort to starve out the Germans through his demonic “Morgenthau Plan.”  During the war terroristic American and British pilots firebombed whole German civilian cities; one blatant example being the firebombing of Dresden where over 100,000 Germans were incinerated in a fiery holocaust in one night. After the war, U.S. General Dwight Eisenhower deliberately starved to death over one million German POWs in an open air concentration camp.  From 1944-1950 14 million ethnic Germans were forcibly expelled from Eastern Europe, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Austria as well as from the German territories stripped away from Germany and given to Poland and the Soviet Union after the war.  Millions of them died in the process. Allied troops massacred German POWs and civilians for fun. Up to 5,000,000 German POWs were forced to become slave laborers in Stalin’s Gulags in the years after the war where they perished. Germans were used as slave laborers not only in the USSR but the United States, Britain, France and Eastern Europe. British and American troops collaborated with the evil Soviet NKVD. They jointly ran concentration camps for many years after the war. They hunted down and machine gunned men, women and children.  Another amazing fact that has been swept under the rug and completely forgotten is that Britain, under the leadership of genocidal maniac Winston Churchill, orchestrated a man-made famine which, according to most authoritative sources, took the lives of between 5 to 7 million Indians in Bengal during the war! 
On the other hand, the evidence shows that the Germans were the most humane participants in the war. From Michael Walsh’s excellent study on Allied war crimes :
“By contrast the German armed forces behaved impeccably towards their prisoners-of-war. “The most amazing thing about the atrocities in this war is that there have been so few of them. I have come up against few instances where the Germans have not treated prisoners according to the rules, and respected the Red Cross” reported respected newspaper The Progressive February, 4th 1945.Allan Wood, London Correspondent of the London Express agreed. “The Germans even in their greatest moments of despair obeyed the Convention in most respects. True it is that there were front line atrocities – passions run high up there – but they were incidents, not practices, and misadministration of their American prison camps was very uncommon.” Lieutenant Newton L. Marguiles echoed his words.US Assistant Judge Advocate, Jefferson Barracks, April 27th1945. “It is true that the Reich exacted forced labour from foreign workers, but it is also true that, they were for the most part paid and fed well.”“I think some of the persons found themselves better off than at any time in their lives before.” added Dr.James K.Pollack, Allied Military Government.“What did the Germans do to get efficient production from forced labour that we were not able to do with Germans working down the mines? They fed their help and fed them well.” Said Max H. Forester, Chief of AMG’s Coal and Mining Division in July 1946.”
Carefully consider the evidence presented herein, which is by no means all of the evidence. One can decidedly disprove the official story of the holocaust and show it to be nothing more than a tissue of lies, distortions and propaganda. This evidence has been readily available to any competent investigator, and has been championed by tenacious Revisionists for decades. Which makes it all the more puzzling why a “Professor” and supposed “truth seeker” like Anthony J. Hall is so completely oblivious to its existence. Or perhaps he is fully aware of it but a confirmation bias has motivated him to ignore it in favor of an untenable fairy tale — that being the official dogma of Holocaustianity.
Joshua Blakeney Supports Zionist Line on the Protocols
As internet writer Banjo_Billy so eloquently elucidated in his superbly written essay –which handily refutes the Zionist-trumpeted conspiracy theory that the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion were a forgery by conspiring “antisemites”– the Jews ironically exemplified and utilized all of the sinister stratagems and treacherous tactics outlined within the Protocols in their ceaseless campaign to discredit the Protocols. The author commented: “The Jews of the world proclaimed the Protocols to be a forgery. But rather than prove them to be so by the honest methods of logic and legal reasoning, they resorted to murder, bribery, blackmail, liable, slander, deceit, perjury, swindles and lies in their efforts to disprove them — not at all the methods of honest and innocent defendants but certainly the methods of criminals trying to evade their guilt.” [emphasis added]
In Kevin Barrett’s June 8th 2011 No Lies Radio broadcast , Joshua Blakeney confessed: “I’ve never read that book [The Protocols of Zion] in my whole life.” A little over a month later, on July 13th, Blakeney published an article within which he hastily and ignorantly endorsed the official Jewish narrative, stating as fact that the Protocols Of Zion are “fraudulent and false.”  Wow, going from not having read the Protocols to declaring them “fraudulent and false” a month later. Was this astonishing epiphany a month later the result of an in-depth study of the origins of the Protocols or lack-thereof? No objective truth seeker would rush to a definitive conclusion that quickly on a disputed issue like the authenticity of the Protocols Of Zion. He certainly didn’t reach his conclusions about what really happened on 9/11 within a month’s time-frame.
Blakeney clearly has a bias in favor of the Jews on the issue of the Protocols which led him to rashly dismiss the authenticity of the Protocols in favor of an unproven conspiracy theory advanced by criminal Zionist Jews. What Blakeney, the Jews, and all those who insist the Protocols are fake cannot explain, is how the Protocols accurately predicted the great depression, the Russian Revolution, the first world war and the rise of liberalism; perhaps the ‘Russian agent’ was Nostradamus? At the sixth Zionist Congress meeting in 1903 Jewish-Zionist leader Max Nordau predicted that there would be a “world war” and that “a free and Jewish Palestine” would be created with England’s assistance. In 1914 World War I began as Nordau had predicted. In 1917 the British government decreed the “Balfour Declaration” promising the Jews a homeland in Palestine, as Nordau predicted they would. In 1911, twenty-two years before Hitler came to power and three years before World War I began, Nordau made another prediction: 6,000,000 Jews would be annihilated (a prophecy other Zionists had been advancing as well). In 1979, Isser Harel, the founder and creator of the Israeli Mossad terrorist organization, predicted the 9/11 attacks. Harel told a Christian Zionist evangelist who was visiting him in Israel that “terrorists” would soon strike New York City’s “tallest building” because it was a “phallic symbol.” What’s more likely: Zionist Jews are psychic clairvoyants or that they simply make all of these these predictions happen? Zionist terrorist leader Vladimir Jabotinsky gave us some insight into that question; Jabotinsky, exulting in the power of his race, stated “There is only one power which really counts. The power of political pressure. We Jews are the most powerful people on earth, because we have this power, and we know how to apply it.”
In the case of the holocaust the Zionists simply made the propaganda fit the prophecy. There assuredly was no holocaust of “6,000,000 Jews”–not in 1906, 1919, 1921 or in the 1940’s either.
Maybe Blakeney’s staunch endorsement of the Jewish line on the Protocols is a compromise of sorts that he has made in order to get the Zionists off his back a little since he is (to his credit) an outspoken anti-Zionist; albeit a leftist one. If that is indeed the case, then that doesn’t say much about his dedication to the truth when he is willing to endorse a fraudulent narrative because it’s politically expedient or politically correct to do so.
Blakeney A Communist
Joshua Blakeney has, on a number of occasions, proudly proclaimed himself to be an “avid Marxist” and a Communist. In one of Kevin Barrett’s previous radio broadcasts in March , Blakeney praised Jewish Communist mass murderers as “the smartest Jews” because they were, Blakeney said, “assimilationists.” He iterated: “I always say, I think the smartest Jews were the Communists because they were the most ultra-assimilationists … Jewish people who wanted to work with non-Jewish people to emancipate themselves and rid themselves of class-rule, cuz obviously whenever you have a ruling class they need to divide and rule the working class based on ethnic and religious lines … by ending a system that requires divide and rule, requires ethnicity to be emphasized, doing away with that system would be very good for everybody.” This interpretation of Jewish Communist motivations is downright false. Firstly, Jews in Communist Russia and Communist Eastern Europe did not fully assimilate and were thus not “ultra-assimilationists” as Blakeney asserts. Kevin MacDonald, a courageous professor of psychology at the California State University-Longbeach, accurately discerned that Jews maintained a strong secular Jewish identity and constituted a “hostile elite” in the Soviet Union and in other Communist countries. Stanley Hornbeck’s review of Kevin MacDonald’s excellent book Culture of Critique noted:
“Prof. MacDonald emphasizes that although Jewish Communists preached both atheism and the solidarity of the world’s working people, they took pains to preserve a distinct, secular Jewish identity. He reports that Lenin himself (who had one Jewish grandparent) approved the continuation of an explicitly Jewish identity under Communism, and in 1946 the Communist Party of the United States voted a resolution also supporting Jewish peoplehood in Communist countries. Thus, although Communism was supposed to be without borders or religion, Jews were confident that it would make a place for their own group identity. He writes that despite the official view that all men were to be brothers, ‘very few Jews lost their Jewish identity during the entire soviet era.'”
Secondly, Blakeney has been deceived, like so many naive Gentiles before him, about the real intentions of the Marxist Jews who preached a doctrine of moral universalism. As Kevin MacDonald has conclusively shown in his comprehensive book on Jewish group evolutionary strategy, Culture of Critique, Jews always package their subversive political ideologies in a universalist cloak as a way of appealing to and attracting Non-Jews to join their cause; a method whereby Jews induct Gentiles into the service of International Jewry. They do this in such a way as to disguise and conceal the ethnic Jewish agenda behind political and social movements (such as Marxism, Communism, Neo-Conservatism and Egalitarianism) by outwardly portraying it as “good for everybody” when it is in reality only good for the Jews.  Marxism and Communism were undeniably a Jewish-led effort to overthrow Christendom, annihilate the “best of the Gentiles,” erase the concepts of race, nationality, religion and family from the Gentile psyche as well as crush Gentile resistance to Jewish domination: what Jewish propagandists label “antisemitism.”
Blakeney is (rightly) a big critic of the policy of Western capitalist governments today but he naively sees the Capitalist West as something opposed to Communism via the fraudulent hoax called the Cold War. He ought to realize that Western pseudo-democratic “capitalist” countries, such as Great Britain, France, the United States and Canada, worked surreptitiously to cover up and hide Communist atrocities. They all enthusiastically colluded with the Soviet-Communist butchers to destroy the Nazis and other anti-Communists. When the Jewish Bolsheviks seized power in Russia in 1917 and promptly began rounding up and mass executing millions of Russian Patriots, millions more starved to death in a man-made famine engineered by Lenin and Trotsky, the entire West stood idly by and watched as this bloody nightmare unfolded. The Western press was, for the most part, silent — not a crumb was written about the horrid Bolshevik repressions in American or British newspapers. The Jewish-influenced press was, in fact, supportive of what was going on in Russia. In 1932 when Jewish Bolsheviks Lazar Kaganovich, Genrikh Yagoda, and their Jewish-dominated Cheka (Communist Secret Police)  engineered a man-made famine in the Ukraine, annihilating between 20 to 25 percent of the Ukrainian population , Western governments and Western Mainstream Press were basically mute. In fact, Jewish-owned publications like the New York Times enthusiastically published Walter Duranty’s Pro-Stalinist tripe which denied that anything sinister was going on in the Ukraine. 
When the Soviets invaded and annexed eastern Poland in September of 1939 the Western Press and Western Governments did not utter a word of criticism, but universally condemned Germany for the same act in the West of Poland. Moreover, when the Soviets attacked Finland a few months later, and then the Baltic states in 1940, no Western governments or newspapers condemned these illegal acts of Soviet aggression. When Britain and the United States found out that the Soviets had massacred 22,000 captured Polish military officers in the Katyn forest shortly after they had occupied Poland, not only did the US and Britain not condemn this act of genocide but they studiously worked to cover it up demanding that not one word be printed about the travesty in the papers. At one point they even tried to blame the atrocity on the Germans as the Soviets had done! As this PBS article noted, “Neither the British nor the American governments wanted to know too much about the graves. If their ally, Joseph Stalin, had ordered the murders, they preferred to keep it quiet. When a British diplomat in London wrote a report suggesting that the Soviet Union had been responsible for the massacre, Prime Minister Winston Churchill addressed the issue in a confidential note, stating: “there is no use prowling morbidly round the three year old graves of Smolensk.”” Another example of this capitalist-communist collusion was in 1944 when an astonishing letter, written by the British Ministry of Information, was sent to the BBC and higher members of the clergy instructing them to hide Communist Red Army atrocities by inventing propaganda against the Germans.
Communism is just another system of Jewish control, a scam for Jewish hegemony. Who could doubt it when it’s two principal architects were Jews of Rabbinic descent — Moses Hess and Karl Marx. Hess converted both Marx and Engels to Communism. Marx referred to Hess as the “Red Rabbi.” In 1935 Rabbi Stephen Wise, who we met earlier in this article, stated “Some call it Marxism, I call it Judaism.” 
The September 10, 1920, edition of American Hebrew Magazine bragged:
“The Bolshevist revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction, and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental and physical forces, become a reality all over the world.”
In 1920 Winston Churchill (who later, as PM of England, became one of Jewry’s most loyal servants) wrote a revealing article entitled, Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People, in which he keenly expressed the view that Communism was a “worldwide revolutionary conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization” and that this conspiracy was led by, Churchill wrote, “atheistic, International Jews.” 
The 1905 Jewish Encyclopedia states, “While in Germany socialism has attracted individual Jews, in Russia it has become a movement of the Jewish masses.” 
Robert Wilton, a long time Russia correspondent for the London Times, said in his book The Last Days of the Romanovs: “According to the data furnished by the Soviet press, out of 556 important functionaries of the Bolshevik State there were in 1918-1919: 17 Russians, 2 Ukrainians, 11 Armenians, 35 Lets, 15 Germans, 1 Hungarian, 10 Georgians, 2 Poles, 2 Finns, 1 Karaim, 457 Jews.” 
A similar thing was alleged in a report of the American Expeditionary forces to Siberia, March 1, 1919. Captain Montgomery Schyler, speaking of events following the decline of the First Provisional Government, says:
“These hopes were frustrated by the gradual gains in power of the more irresponsible and socialistic elements of the population, guided by the Jews and other anti-Russian races. A table made in April 1918 by Robert Wilton, the correspondent of the London Times in Russia, shows that at that time there were 384 “commissars” including 2 Negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen, 22 Armenians and more than 300 Jews. Of the latter number, 264 had come to Russia from the United States since the downfall of the Imperial government.” 
The Encyclopedia Judaica’s article on Communism substantiates much of what so-called anti-Semites have been saying about Jewish domination of the Communist movement. It states, “The Communist movement and ideology played an important part in Jewish life, particularly in the 1920s, 1930s, and during and after World War II.” Individual Jews, the Encyclopedia Judaica writes, “played an important role in the early stages of Bolshevism and the Soviet Regime.” The article continues: “In some countries Jews became the leading element in the legal and illegal Communist parties and in some cases were even instructed by the Communist International to change their Jewish-sounding names and pose as non-Jews, in order not to confirm right wing propaganda that presented Communism as an alien, Jewish conspiracy.” The article then goes on to name quite a few top Jewish Bolshevik functionaries, “The Bolshevik faction contained a number of Jews mainly in the field of organization and propaganda … They included such people as Maxim Litvinov (Wallach), M. Liadov (Mandelshtam), Grigory Shklovsky, A. Soltz, S. Guzev (Drabkin), Grigory Zinoviev (Radomyslsky), Lev Kamenev (Rosenfeld), Rozaliya Zemliachka (Zalkind), Helena Rosmirovich, Yemeli Yaroslavsky (Gubelman), Serafimer Gopner, G. Sokolnikov, I. Platnitsky, Jacob Sverdlov, M. Vladimirov, P. Zalutsky, A. Lozovsky, Y. Yaklovlev (Epstein), Lazar Kaganovich, D. Shvartzman, Simon Dimanstein … Trotsky [Bronstein], M. Uritsky, M. Volodarsky, J. Sleklov, Adolf Joffee, David Riazanov (Goldenbach), Yuri Larin and Karl Radek (Sobelsohn). “
Jews Declare Anti-Communism = Anti-Semitism
Lenin himself declared capital punishment for any Russian who criticized Jews or identified Jewish leaders with Russian names as Jewish:
“Anti-Semitism was branded as being counterrevolutionary in nature, and persons participating in pogroms or instigating them were outlawed (by a special decree issued by the Council of Commissars in July 1918, signed and personally amended by Lenin to sharpen its tone). A statement against Anti-Semitism made by Lenin in March 1918 was put on a phonograph record, to be used in a mass campaign against the counterrevolutionary incitement against the Jews.” 
If anti-Semitism was “counterrevolutionary” that must mean all the revolutionaries were Jewish.
In 1931 Soviet Dictator Josef Stalin told the Jewish News Agency in the United States that “Under USSR law active anti-Semites are liable to the death penalty!” 
In 1941, New York Publication “Jewish Life,” and “Jewish Voice,” told their readers that Anti-Communism is Anti-Semitism. The New York publication “Jewish Voice,” July and August of 1941, page 23, states as follows: “Anti-Communism is anti-Semitism.” Another quote, this from the Jewish publication “Jewish Life,” also New York, “Scratch a professional anti-Communist and you’ll find an anti-Semite.”  If it’s anti-Semitic to oppose Communism that must mean Communism is Jewish and serves Jewish interests.
At the Yalta conference in 1945 Stalin declared: “I am a Zionist.” 
Jewish Wall Street Bankers Financed the Reds
This fact blows away the myth that Communism was a “working class” movement; it was not. Communism was, for all intents and purposes, an elitist Jewish movement. Not only were Jews the lead actors on the ground in fomenting the Bloody Bolshevik Revolution in Russia and other attempted revolutions, but they were funded to power by Jewish bankers on Wall Street, particularly Jacob Schiff, the Rothschild emissary in New York who headed Kuhn, Loeb & Co., bank. Schiff is reported to have “sank about $20,000,000 for the final triumph of Bolshevism in Russia.” 
Schiff reportedly gave this vast sum of money to the Jewish Marxist agitator Leon Trotzky (aka Leiba Bronstein) who Schiff had brought to New York to recruit Russian Jewish immigrants from the Lower East Side of the city for the Bolshevik revolution.
Trotzky trained Russian Jewish emigrants as revolutionaries and brought them back with him to Russia with the expressed purpose of overthrowing Czar Nicholas II, whom the Jews hated, implementing brutal Communism, exterminating the “best of the Gentiles,” and establishing a Jewish empire — a central organization with which to foment global revolution and the eventual Jewish takeover of the entire planet. According to Juri Lina’s book Under the Sign of the Scorpion, it was Jacob Schiff, not Lenin, who ordered the murder of the Russian Royal family. 
The ritual murder of the Russian imperial family was carried out by a cabal of Jewish assassins led by the Jews Jacob Sverdlov and Yankel Yurovsky.  One of the Jewish butchers of the Romanov family etched in Hebrew the words adapted from a poem by German-Jewish poet Heinrich Heine on the wall of the Ipatiev House, where the Romanov’s were shot and bayoneted. The poetic line inscribed on the wall next to the bloodied corpses of the Romanovs alluded to the death of a Gentile ruler in ancient Babylon who had “wronged the God of Israel.” A clear display that another Gentile king, the Czar, had been killed as an act of Jewish retribution. 
An article published in the New York Times on May 17, 1917, reported on a celebratory dinner held by the “American Jewish Friends of a Free Russia.” The article disclosed that Jacob Schiff was introduced at the gathering as a “Russian Revolutionist”; Schiff said the Russian Jew had been liberated; Schiff said the first act of the new government was to invite home all the exiles (i.e. Jews from the Pale of Settlement) who would completely grab hold of Russia. The Jewish Bolsheviks took power five months later, in October. At another meeting a week earlier Schiff announced that thanks were due to the Jew (his words) that the revolution in Russia had succeeded. 
A Jewish writer for Ynetnews.com, Sever Plocker, confirms much of what so-called anti-Semites have been saying about the Jewishness of Communism in an article entitled, “Stalin’s Jews.” He rightly reminds us that “some of the greatest mass murderers of modern times were Jewish.”  I couldn’t agree more.
None of the leading Bolshevik Revolutionists were even working class people. They were all relatively well off and vastly increased their wealth under the Communist system. Only a fool and dupe would fall for this unfeasible “workers paradise,” “socialist utopia” nonsense. That’s simply a Jewish marketing ploy to agitate the workers to revolt and install the Jewish leaders of the movement into power whereby they can conduct their agenda of theft, mass destruction and genocide.
Communist atrocities and mass murder have been trivialized, downplayed and downright soft-peddled in Western media, film, television and academia. It’s hardly even mentioned in high school or college history classes. A BBC article, which explores the West’s shameful glorification and trivialization of bloody Communism, intelligently noted, “He had the blood of millions on his hands, yet Joseph Stalin has escaped Hitler-style demonisation, and even become a trendy pin-up. Why has history been so kind to this murderous leader…”  Why indeed? Blakeney should ponder this question.
Despite over 100,000,000 people being systematically murdered or otherwise dying unnatural deaths under Communist regimes globally, the ideology of Communism doesn’t seem to have the same sting or negative connotation associated with it that Fascism and Nazism (National Socialism) do — despite the latter having killed far fewer people than the Communists and no more (perhaps less) than Western so-called democracies like the United States and Britain. Why is Communist totalitarianism so soft-peddled in the West when the Communists have murdered, tortured, brutalized, enslaved, imprisoned, raped and oppressed more human beings than any other political system in human history? The reason is simple: Jews dominate and control the Western press (mass media, television, publishing houses & Hollywood) and Jews supported, or, as Frank L. Britton hypothesized, were behind Communism. 
Of course, from the perspective of the Jews, dredging up the memory of the bloody Communist Holocaust of 40 million Gentiles in the USSR might attract some unwanted attention upon the decisive Jewish role in that genocide. They simply don’t want people looking into these things. Jews are all about sweeping their genocidal crimes under the rug while falsely accusing their enemies of committing crimes against them.
If Michael Shermer Supports The Holocaust Story, Then Why Do They?
If the U.S. government came out and hypothesized that flying unicorns attacked the Twin Towers on 9/11 Michael Shermer (pictured) would come out in defense of that position. Shermer is the publisher of Skeptic Magazine and is a well known defender of all government-disseminated conspiracy theories (official stories) and for his opposition to alternative theories about 9/11 and other major historical events.
In this video posted to Youtube Anthony J. Hall and Joshua Blakeney confront Shermer about his deceitful tactics at a speech he was giving at their university. They are rightly critical of Shermer’s pseudo-skepticism and have realized that Shermer simply supports the official government version of every event. Yet hypocritically, Hall and Blakeney generally agree with Shermer on the issue of the holocaust.
Michael Shermer has dedicated a lot of his time as a pseudo “debunker” trying to combat Holocaust Revisionists and even wrote a paltry book of porous research attempting to refute Revisionists called, “Denying History: Who Said the Holocaust Never Happened and Why Do They Say It?” (Here is an essay refuting Shermer’s feeble anti-revisionist writings) Why is Michael Shermer so supportive of the holocaust story? And why, if Hall and Blakeney know Shermer is a fraud and a liar, would they believe Shermer’s position on the holocaust is any more credible than his position on 9/11? Hall and Blakeney are clearly lacking consistency in their skepticism. I hypothesize that one reason for their support of holocaustianity could be because they are communists and the holocaust story trivializes and distracts from Communism’s bloody past.
Michael Shermer actually engaged in a debate with Holocaust Revisionist Mark Weber back in the 90’s. Unsurprisingly, in the nearly two hour debate Weber cleaned Shermer’s clock on the holocaust issue, making Shermer look like an amateur and a fool. Shermer conceded so many points to the Revisionists that it almost sounded like he had become a Revisionist by the time the debate was finished. This was a major victory for Historical Revisionism and has brought much embarrassment to Shermer and dealt a major blow to the Holocaust Industry. Watch the Weber-Shermer Holocaust debate below:
Conclusion – Hall and Blakeney Are Dishonest Frauds
In closing, the evidence presented herein incontrovertibly demonstrates that Professor Anthony J. Hall and Joshua Blakeney are not sincere in their skepticism. Their support of the conspicuous fraud of Holocaustianity and dismissal of the Protocols of Zion are clear examples of dishonesty. Blakeney’s vivacious support of evil Communism proves that he is not really opposed to Jewish domination, despite proclaiming to be anti-Zionist. It is apparent that Professor Hall and Josh Blakeney are not genuine skeptics, and have undertaken a limited hang-out or politically correct approach to seeking the truth. I advise readers to beware the disinformation of these type of phony truth seekers and activists, they are no friends of the truth.
Sources (click images to enlarge)
3) Hall, Anthony J. “Prof. Anthony Hall on the Lesley Hughes Affair.” 911Blogger.com. <http://911blogger.com/node/17968>
4) Hoffman, Michael. “Truth About the Talmud: Judaism’s Holiest Book.” Revisionist History: beyond the Gatekeepers. <http://www.revisionisthistory.org/talmudtruth.html>
5) Kaufman, N. Theodore, Germany Must Perish!, Argyle Press, Newark, New Jersey, (1941) <http://www.historiography-project.org/books/19410000germany_perish.html>
7) Ilya Ehrenberg – The Man Who Invented The ‘Six Million’ Jeff Rense Program. <http://www.rense.com/general75/ehr.htm>
8] Strom, Kevin Alfred. “The Greatest Mass Rape in History.” Racial Nationalist Library. <http://library.flawlesslogic.com/massrape.htm>
9) Bryant, John. “History & Scriptural Origin of the Six Million Number.” The Birdman. <http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Jews/Jews-History&ScripturalOriginOfThe6MillionNumber.html>
10) “ZIONISTS MASS MEETING.” New York Times. 11 June 1900. <http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9E01E7D61F3CE433A25752C1A9609C946197D6CF>
Make sure to visit The Six Million myth by Zion Crime Factory