Scalise “White Supremacist” Story COMPLETE BULL

David-Duke-Steve Scalise REDO
I saw this story reported on ABC’s “World News Tonight with David Muir” (the dinner time news hour for Americans). As the substitute anchor babe that night told viewers “Republican Steve Scalise attended a WHITE SUPREMACIST meeting…” they cut to the above right photo of David Duke in his Klan regalia (taken about a million years ago); while slowly focusing in on Duke’s White face. The message: “Don’t any of you Goy politicians even think about talking to Whites organizing and standing up for White interests, or we’ll turn you into another GD Adolf Hitler!” That’s OK only for peeps of color, fags and other freaks of nature now being pushed on us decent Whites of European and Christian heritage. [INCOG]

From Council of Conservative Citizens

The claim that US Representative Steve Scalise spoke at a 2002 conference organized by David Duke, is a hoax.

The fake story was originally reported on a left-wing blog. It was then picked up by media all over the world, and reported as a factual story.

The debunking of the fake story, however, is a much smaller news story. The media always gives left-wing hoaxes the front page, and then posts the retraction in the back of the paper. Many media outlets even reported that Scalise had admitted to speaking at the David Duke conference.

The SPLC, which has a history of promoting hoaxes, told media outlets that Scalise “gave a speech to a well-known group of white supremacists and neo-Nazis.” SPLC writers falsely accused Scalise of lying about the event, and demanded that he resign from his post. The SPLC has yet to make an apology or retraction.

The media reported the false claim with such fury that both “Scalise” and “David Duke” became trending topics on twitter all over the United States.

Steve Scalise spoke to the Jefferson Heights Civic Association at a hotel in Metairie, LA in 2002. The subject of the meeting was establishing neighborhood watches. A representative of the Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Department spoke. A representative from the Red Cross gave a CPR demonstration.

A couple hours after that meeting was over, a conference organized by David Duke started at the same hotel. Scalise did not speak at, or attend, the David Duke conference. Other people at the conference, have stated that they never saw Steve Scalise, and had no idea he had even been at the same hotel.

The New Orleans Times-Picayune admitted the story was a hoax on December 31st. However, many left-wing pundits and left-wing websites were still hyping the false claim on January 2nd.

In fact, even as we publish this media, outlets and websites are issuing fresh calls for Scalise to resign from his post as Majority Whip, or for the GOP to strip him of his position. Even many so-called “conservatives” are grovelling to the left and calling on Scalise to resign from his post.

Marxist Jews destroying America and their liberal “Shabbos goys” want like hell to keep us White people from the least racial pride and most especially from organizing among ourselves to stand up for our race. Think about all the “PC” BS now going down these days — it fits together like a glove! [INCOG]


Print Friendly
Download PDF


100% White boy born and bred in the USA. Dedicated to awakening Whites to all the crap being done to our decent, fair-minded race and exposing the devious brainwashing rats behind it all. Wake the ef up, White people!
This entry was posted in Jew Media and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

80 Responses to Scalise “White Supremacist” Story COMPLETE BULL

  1. SazzyLilSmartAzz says:


  2. SazzyLilSmartAzz says:


    Robert Allen “Bob” Iger (born February 10, 1951) is an American businessman and the current chairman and chief executive officer of The Walt Disney Company. He was named president of Disney in 2000, and later succeeded Michael Eisner as chief executive in 2005.
    Iger was born to a Jewish family in Long Island, New York.

  3. SazzyLilSmartAzz says:

    “Is it time for explicit talk about White interests in Louisiana?”

    by Kevin MacDonald

    The speech” supposedly” given by Rep. Steve Scalise to David Duke’s group is now a major national news story (see James Edwards’ article). One might think that this could be a teachable moment, but of course the mainstream media is doing everything it can to ensure that it is not. It’s just another opportunity to call Duke and anyone with similar views “White Supremacists” or “Neo-Nazis.” The Washington Post headline is typical: “House Majority Whip Scalise confirms he spoke to White supremacists in 2002.” The New York Times refers to Duke as “the former Klansman and white supremacist who two decades ago was almost elected Louisiana governor.” CNN labels him “a notorious White supremacist.” The video on the CNN page achieves the trifecta: “White supremacist,” “neo-Nazi,” and “former Ku Klux Klan leader” — as well as a statement from Jewish ethnonationalist and pro-Israel fanatic Charles Krauthammer saying that Scalise should resign from his leadership position. The Daily Caller which bills itself as a conservative site, also used the “White supremacist” label.

    The “White supremacist” phrase is particularly galling. This is a very effective term of art invented by the left to pathologize any sense that White people have interests like everyone else. Israel is already a de facto Jewish state, but we never hear about Jewish supremacists in the Western media. No one labels Koreans as Korean supremacists if they oppose displacement-level immigration from Africa because they desire their country to remain Korean.

    That the label is routinely used so effectively in the U.S. media is telling testimony to the power of the anti-White left.

    White conservatives are terrified to be tarred with the label. As a result, policies that in fact would benefit Whites can never be advertised as such — so White politicians necessarily become adept at phrasing their implicitly White policies in terms of abstractions like “big government.” Indeed, the NYTimes article claims that in his 1991 run for governor, Duke avoided explicit talk about White racial interests. He “told voters he regretted being ‘too intolerant’ in his youth and said he would not disown his daughters if they brought home an African-American or Jewish boyfriend. Instead, he focused on anti-big government and anti-tax mantras that preceded the Tea Party movement.” He also advocated implicitly pro-White policies like forcing welfare recipients to take birth control. And after being elected to the state House of Representatives in 1989, Duke proposed “measures implementing stricter guidelines for residents of public housing, repealing affirmative action programs and eliminating minority set-asides” — policies obviously aimed at benefiting the White majority.

    The fact is, however, that Duke’s political positions in the early 1990s are now part of the mainstream and reflect the steadily increasing racialization of American politics resulting from massive non-White immigration — exacerbated in Louisiana by the history of racial politics. As the NYTimes article notes,

    in his 1991 campaign for governor against Edwin W. Edwards, Mr. Duke largely avoided explicitly racial campaigning, appealed to the frustrations and resentments of white voters and won more than 60 percent of the white vote while losing in a runoff election. Two decades later, much of his campaign has merged with the political mainstream here, and rather than a bad memory from the past, Mr. Duke remains a window into some of the murkier currents in the state’s politics where Republicans have sought and eventually won Mr. Duke’s voters, while turning their back on him.

    Throughout the U.S., White people are increasingly voting on the basis of their racial identity rather than their social class, and this trend is even more pronounced in Louisiana than many other areas. The same NYTimes article quotes a Louisiana political analyst noting that in the recent senatorial election the Democrat candidate, Mary Landrieu, carried only 18 percent of the white vote, while the Republican candidate, Bill Cassidy, captured just 5 percent of the black vote. Obviously racial polarization in Louisiana has increased since the 1990s. A similar level of racial polarization throughout the country would result in total Republican domination.

    But, more importantly, it also suggests that, at least in Louisiana, it would not fatally damage a White politician in a district with a clear White majority to make explicit appeals to White identity and White interests. Indeed, it may well be the case that an explicit appeal to White interests would be a good strategy in a primary election against another White Republican who spouted diversity mantras even while appealing to implicit Whiteness on policy issues. Indeed, the NYTimes article notes that Duke’s “decision to run to the right of the field is now a common maneuver in Louisiana’s open primary system.”

    The 82-18 split among White voters is a clear indication that the great majority of Whites are voting on the basis of their racial identity, not their social class or other factors. With a divergence so great, the only Whites voting Democrat are deluded college professors and other readers of the New York Times, social misfits, and low-information Whites who continue to be captivated by media messages emanating from Hollywood.

    I suggest it is very unlikely that the great majority of these Whites are going to be intimidated and guilt-tripped by the deluge of charges of “racism” and “White supremacism” that a campaign phrased in terms of explicit Whiteness would elicit from the mainstream media. Such people are simply not going to vote for the party of Al Sharpton, La Raza, and Elizabeth Warren.

    Duke was clearly ahead of his times in promoting policies that appeal to the White majority of Louisiana, even though he got over 60% of the White vote in the 1991 election despite hostility from the Louisiana media, a deluge of out-of-state money to the opposition, and even threats that factories and jobs would leave Louisiana if he was elected.

    It’s a different atmosphere now than in 1991. I suggest that it’s time for an explicit appeal to White interests in states and congressional districts with lopsided majorities of Whites voting Republican. Metapolitics is all well and good. But with such large White majorities, more direct options should be explored. The election of an explicitly White politician to statewide or federal office would be, to quote Ben Wattenberg out of context, “heartening news of an almost transcendental quality.”

    And if the national Republican party blocks the nomination of explicitly pro-White candidates, it’s definitely time for a third party.

  4. SazzyLilSmartAzz says:

    “Alan Dershowitz says ‘anti-Israeli zealots are loving’ accusations against him”

    LOL!!! Maybe he should hire a good jewish lawyer


    From The Jerusalem Post

    New York – Anti-Semites and anti-Israel “zealots” are having a field day over sexual abuse charges being leveled against Alan Dershowitz, the prominent Jewish American attorney told The Jerusalem Post on Sunday.

    The celebrity advocate, who is well known for his pro-Israel advocacy and high profile clients, stands accused of engaging in sexual activity with a minor employed by former client Jeffrey Epstein.

    Last week Dershowitz was named in a lawsuit charging that federal prosecutors in Florida broke the law by granting Epstein a plea deal to avoid federal prosecution.
    According to a court filing quoted by the website Politico, Epstein forced the woman, referred to as Jane Doe #3, to have sex with Dershowitz, British Prince Andrew and other prominent figures.

    Doe alleged that she had sex on private airplanes and in multiple locations in the United States with Dershowitz and that Epstein made her have sex with the Duke of York in London, New York and on a private Caribbean island, as part of “an orgy with numerous other under-aged girls.”

    Her accusations came as part of an ongoing civil case brought against the US government by several women who say they were abused by Epstein, who served jail time on state child sex charges but was not prosecuted in federal court as part of a plea agreement.

    Doe’s aim was to show that Epstein’s plea deal was invalid by showing that his attorneys were involved in sexual activities, Dershowitz told the Post, adding that the allegations against him were “completely fabricated and made up out of whole cloth.”

    “I don’t know this woman. I’ve never been with this woman. I’ve never been in the places and times they say I was. I can prove all that,” he said.

    Beyond the damage to his reputation, Dershowitz also bemoaned the fact that he was “beginning to get all kinds of emails [from] anti-Israel and anti-Semitic groups, the most recent one saying ‘see Jews have always been in charge of the sex trade.’”

    “The anti-Semites are crawling out from under their rocks, they are loving this. And the anti-Israel zealots are loving this” as well, he said. “I’m not only defending myself here but I am defending other values as well. I am defending the values that I have represented and stood for, for so many years.”

    Dershowitz stated that he will not rest until the world knows that the charges against him were fabricated and in pursuit of this goal he will be filing disbarment proceedings against Doe’s legal team for “filing a false statement in court” as well as initiating a defamation action.

    “I am seeking to enter an appearance in the case in order to be able to challenge them in court. I am filing a sworn affidavit which subjects me to perjury prosecution if I am lying and I am waving the statute of limitations on any criminal charges and challenging the woman to file criminal charges against me because if she does, she’s committed a crime by filing the false charge,” he said.

    Dershowitz also encouraged Doe to “speak out” and provide details of her allegations to the media so that he could sue her and refute her point by point.

    “There is an irony to it in that she has said I am trying to silence her. To the contrary I am trying to make her speak so she repeats these statements,” he said.

  5. RED PILL says:

    Jewish dance
    Jewish dance refers to dance associated with Jews and Judaism. Dance has long been used by Jews as a medium for the expression of joy and other communal emotions. Dancing was a favorite pastime and played a role in religious observance.

    Gentile dance
    Gentile dance refers to dance associated with gentiles and White racial pride. Dance has long been used by Gentiles as a medium for the expression of joy and other communal emotions. especially when jews are caught with there pants down.

    do you know how to the dance the “Dershowitz”

  6. hens are liars says:

    So what exactly did Steve Scalise do that pissed off the jews to the point that they attacked him? Did he vote against them? Did he inform them that he would no longer kiss their asses? What was their motive?

    Over the years I have seen enough that I easily recognize a smear job when I see it, and this one sticks out like a sore thumb, especially since they stayed after it even though it was proven to be false.

  7. SazzyLilSmartAzz says:

    hens are liars – I believe this is a Democratic smear against the Republican party in general from what I’ve been reading. Lots of Republicans are White.

  8. Frank Fredenburg says:
  9. Hoff says:

    hens are liars says:

    January 4, 2015 at 6:46 pm

    So what exactly did Steve Scalise do that pissed off the jews to the point that they attacked him?

    Exactly, that is the key question.

  10. Sababu A. Sanyika says:

    White supremacy is a rebellious Jew invention based in an evil, false and blasphemous Biblical interpretation of Noah wherein it was taught that Ham and Canaan were cursed to be black skinned and to be slaves for perpetuity – the infamous “Curse of Ham” scheme to divide and rule over earth by chosen Jews – The only real human beings, with Gentiles as not fully human permanent slave servants to Jews by Divine Command.

    Color racism using color terms to identify people originated with this Babylonian Talmud influence that Rabbis used to concoct the lie. With deliberate deception, these evil Rabbis use opposite color to institutionalize conflict base on skin tone, while they gain material and political benefit and dominance over both Caucasians, Africans and other people of color.

    Starting about 2nd century, this interpretation was taught to innocent, unaware, and mostly illiterate European people for centuries, giving them a mindset of color based supremacy. Jews than manipulated brainwashed Europeans to be an enslaved work force for material and political conquest in orgy of colonial aggression that enriched Jews immensely, empowering them to rule over the conflict.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *