Who Started PC in America TO BEGIN WITH?

NEW FRANKFURT SCHOOL MONTAGE XPRTThe ultra-devious Marxist Frankfurt school taught they were two kinds of revolution: Political and Cultural. But because the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia did not immediately spread across the hated Goyim’s Western world, they decided it best to concentrate on the cultural, believing that by first destroying established social order from within — as quietly and imperceptibly as possible — they could bring about political “revolution of the masses” at a later date. Today’s crazy PC BS is the culmination of Jew subversive efforts going back decades. It will get much, much worse. (INCOG)

The Intellectual Roots Of The American Left’s Emerging Totalitarianism

By Paul Gottfried @VDARE

A recent incident in Wallingford, Connecticut, not far from where I grew up, caused VDARE.com Editor Peter Brimelow to comment: “Cultural Marxist totalitarianism is coming to an America near you.” A complaint was lodged with the local police that “hate” merchandise — Nazi and Confederate memorabilia — was being publicly exhibited and sold at a popular flea market. Following a police investigation, an Anti-Defamation League official named Joshua Sayles expressed the Josh-Sayles ADL Quoteview that “It’s unfortunate that under the law people have the right to sell these things; but it doesn’t mean they should sell these things. It’s not a crime but I would call it hate…”[Wallingford police look into complaint about Nazi, Confederate items sold at flea market, by Mary Ellen Godin, Record-Journal, July 10, 2015].

Chillingly, the assistant regional director of the Connecticut ADL thus unmistakably indicated he was deeply disturbed that a “right” to deal in what he considered “hate” was still allowed. Presumably, in a more sensitive world, no one would be allowed to exhibit or sell either Nazi or Confederate memorabilia. Needless to say, no moral distinction was made between Nazi Germany and the Confederate States of America. They both stood, or so the ADL official implied, for pure “hate.”

“Middle-class, churchgoing goyim, even those who professed to like Jews… could not be trusted. Those who did not resolutely break from the existing order slipped easily into such evils as ‘latent anti-Semitism’ and ‘pseudo-democracy.’”

Peter properly suggests if such hate-inspectors get their way, we will be living in a condition of almost Stalinist oppression. We might not be shipped off to gulags (yet), but the control of speech and thought that these professional sensitizers would impose would be reminiscent of the worst examples of Leftist tyranny. I say “Leftist” intentionally—because rightist or non-leftist regimes have never tried to control their subjects’ minds as systematically as the Left.

Even Adolf Hitler’s Nazi regime largely lost interest in mind reconstruction. It closed up universities as an unnecessary expense by the early 1940s, left the economy in private hands except for those businesses it expropriated, and tolerated a surprisingly wide range of intellectual dissenters.(For example, Karl Jaspers, Hans-Georg Gadamer and other dissenters and critics of the Nazi regime were left untouched in their academic positions. (See Die deutsche Universitatsphilosophie In der Weimarer Republik und im Dritten Reich, by Christian Tilitzki.) Of course, this had nothing to do with being nice. It was simply that the Nazis, aggressive thugs as they were, had no interest in the worldwide indoctrination program dreamed of by the universalist, conversionary and egalitarian zealots of the true Left.

In contrast to the Nazis, the Left has regularly used every means at its disposal to reconstruct the human personality in accordance with its world vision. Perhaps even more significantly, for the last seventy years the Left has imagined itself as a brave force of resistance against a supposedly implacable but entirely fictitious and shape-shifting enemy— the great evil of “fascism.” As I document in my forthcoming book, Fascism: Career of a Concept, the Left’s eternal enemy of “fascism” is variously depicted as racism, Christian fanaticism, European nationalism, or even opposition to Israeli foreign policy.

Curiously, the post-war Italian fascist Movimento Sociale Italiano was fervently pro-Israel as well as pro-NATO. But Jewish “antifascists” can’t be bothered by such details.

The popular concept of fascism also identifies all forms of the European-wide fascist movement with Hitler, who was actually influenced far more by Stalinist totalitarianism than Mussolini’s ramshackle, not particularly repressive government. “Fascist” is arbitrarily equated with both Nazi genocide and anything the cultural Left disapproves of at the moment.

This propagandistic sleight of hand is so blatant that, unless one grasps the current political landscape, it is almost impossible to understand how it works every single time. We are looking here at interlocking political, corporate, and cultural elites when we search for who maintains the system. And there is a unifying doctrine, which for want of a better and more up-to-date name we shall have to call “Cultural Marxism.”

Cultural Marxism‘s central teachings go back genealogically to the Institute for Social Research in interwar Germany. Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer and their radical Leftist colleagues attempted to fuse Marxist economics and Freudian psychology into a critique of bourgeois society. The synthesized result had less to do with serious Marxism than with attacking “repressive” and “patriarchal” family life and offering utopian alternatives.

A major aspect of this emerging self-described “Critical Theory,” particularly after the rise of Nazism and the transfer of the Frankfurt School to the US, was describing and combatting “fascism.” This mission became integral to Critical Theory, together with a continuing crusade against anti-Semitism, which, by a certain internal logic, always accompanied the supposed fascist threat. Since the Frankfurt school theorists were mostly Jewish leftists, these facile associations suited them and their followers rather well.

However, in their interpretation, the ominous fascist threat lurked where you least expected it. Middle-class, churchgoing goyim, even those who professed to like Jews and supported women’s rights and labor unions, could not be trusted. Those who did not resolutely break from the existing order slipped easily into such evils as “latent anti-Semitism” and “pseudo-democracy.”

The_Authoritarian_PersonalityThese psychic and social dangers were described by Horkheimer, Adorno, and others in their massive anthology The Authoritarian Personality, commissioned by the American Jewish Committee after the Second World War and published in 1950, as part of a much larger “Studies in Prejudice” project. [American Jewish Committee News, March 15, 1950.] While in the US, Adorno also created the F-Scale (F for “Fascist”) in social psychology testing, supposed to determine someone’s degree of propensity to subscribe to the hated ideology.

It’s important to remember Critical Theory isn’t a weapon of revolution. It’s a weapon of repression. And it was quickly and thoroughly Americanized. It’s ridiculous to treat it as an exotic import: it took root in American society and culture almost immediately after it was introduced.

Critical Theorists not only found a congenial home in the US, but some were even sent back to “reeducate” the Germans, who had been supposedly corrupted by their “authoritarian” families and “pseudo-democratic” experiences.

Although the Critical Theorists were mostly soft on the Communists, Cold War liberals like Seymour Martin Lipset and other contributors to Commentary stressed the usability of the Frankfurt School’s form of analysis for investigating all enemies of “liberal democracy,” including the Soviets.

The Soviet enemy, in this analysis, were defenders of patriarchal repression and “authoritarian personalities” that stood in the way of democratic progress.

Lipset was also concerned about “working class authoritarianism,” a focus very much present in the work of Adorno and Horkheimer [Political Man, by Seymour Martin Lipset, by Andrew Hacker, Commentary, June 1, 2015]. Communists, fascists and all the benighted simpletons toiling in factories potentially opposed American pluralism. Since we were engaged in a struggle to preserve our democratic, pluralist identity, we also had to be sure that young Americans were instilled with the proper attitudes about tolerance and equality.

One can find in the call for war against “un-American” prejudice beginning in the 1950s the tendency toward Leftist totalitarianism. One major change since then: the number and variety of supposed victims of “prejudice” continue to grow, together with the repressive measures that must be taken to intimidate possible dissenters.

There has also been a collapse in effective opposition to the Leftist Social Justice Warriors. Recent events in the South indicate even many descendants of Confederate soldiers are unwilling to defend their ancestral heritage against hysterical detractors.

The cultural Left, and no other political force, can put gigantic, screaming crowds into the streets in any American city on the spur of the moment. The official Right, by contrast, stays home watching Fox News.

In the absence of real opposition, the cultural-social Left is free to bully and lie as much as it wants. Media-empowered anti-anti-Semites, like ADL officials, freely equate the Confederacy with the perpetrators of the Holocaust, treating both as violent haters and sources of hate for later generations.

Our bogus Conservative Establishment happily rallies to Leftist social positions. No one on the Left sounds as unhinged as “conservative” journalists like Max Boot [Furling the Confederate flag is just the start, Commentary, June 22, 2015]. Or for that matter, Jeff Jacoby [The Confederate flag is anti-American, Boston Globe, July 9, 2015]. Republican congressmen and governors have been at least as zealous as their supposedly more Leftist opposition in calling for the obliteration of Confederate symbols and names.

One also discovers from the Beltway Right press that homosexual rights, including homosexual marriage, is a basic Western value and that European leaders like Victor Orban and Vladimir Putin don’t really belong to the West because they don’t welcome gay activists into the political and educational process [The Authentic Right vs. The Neocons, by Ilana Mercer, WND, December 21, 2007].

Even the relatively isolated, belated complaints of Donald Trump about the crime caused by Third World immigration have elicited frenzied attacks on bigotry from such GOP stalwarts as Linda Chavez and Jeb Bush [Trumped Up, Townhall, July 10, 2015]. Chavez, we might note, has taken valuable time out from bashing the Confederate Battle Flag to deal with the anti-immigration bigots on the right [Linda Chavez: No defending the indefensible, Daily Local News, June 28, 2015].

The Cultural Marxist threat isn’t an epidemic coming from outside: It is raging among our make-believe conservatives, who now often sound as radical as the Frankfurt School.

The critical difference, or so I’ve been told, is that our politicians are usually not self-described socialists, whereas the Critical Theorists were. But even that distinction may no longer be important. Our government and that of other Western countries has grown enormously and now interferes in our social and commercial life far more than it did eighty years ago. Moreover, the major thrust of Cultural Marxism has never been toward the nationalization of productive forces and other classical socialist schemes. It has always been cultural—toward the smashing of bourgeois values, Christian families, gender roles, and what was viewed as a repressive political culture. Government control of the economy was merely an instrument for moving toward the social-cultural goal that the Frankfurt School set for us.

And the social goals of Cultural Marxism are portrayed as the only alternative to a dark night of “fascism” that the ADL, the SPLC, and other like organizations are ostensibly protecting us from.

Yet the specter is never banished. The “Far Right” threat always remains. And as an ever greater number of people find themselves marginalized as “haters,” the actual tyranny taking shape in America could indeed be something even worse than the fevered “fascist” nightmares of the Left’s imagination.

Why are people afraid of the facts about Jews?

                                                                            
JUDAISM IS MARXISM

Print Friendly
Download PDF

About INCOG MAN

100% White boy born and bred in the USA. Dedicated to awakening Whites to all the crap being done to our decent, fair-minded race and exposing the devious brainwashing rats behind it all. Wake the ef up, White people!
This entry was posted in Jew Commies and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

81 Responses to Who Started PC in America TO BEGIN WITH?

  1. Banjo_Billy says:

    “Jesus and Hitler Told the Truth about the Jews; the Jews are Devils — Real Ones!”

    Write this slogan on every wall.

  2. John Taurus, Jews started that white privilege BS. I quit university because I was so sick and tired of having that damn crap jammed down my throat. Smitherines , I guess that’s why I don’t write so well anymore, I quit this university I was going to. I hated it!

  3. protocolsRtrue says:

    BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! jew spy johnathon pollard to be paroled in November. So far has to remain in United States for 5 years, but Obama can waive that and let him move to israel. More to come the asspress is still trying to figure out how to word this report.

    Committed exceptionally grave damage to the national security of the united states.

  4. Bailey says:

    5 years is a long time for a rat to hide.

  5. sog says:

    sentencing a judenrat to judenrat usa ..i smell a rat …

  6. sog says:

    sogs losin it again ..delving into the jew shithole for so long has times and people and dates converging in my mind which on a good day is ahellhole alot ..heh heh ..sorry for the embarass ..fuckin rotney king good riddance …furman la copper used the word nigger alot …yaaaawn ,, less than the average stupid nigger i spose but as a white person the word is off limits except that niggers can openly chant and chimp for the murder of all whites etc …mixed it up real good ..sorry …oj fuckin chimpson was found not guilty by reason of insanity (white guilt insanity) …ok at least i can still recognize when i screw the pooch …will try to not be as faded ….its time to proof read and do a relevant on topik comment protocol ….
    and as for double murder on rodney i mistakenly laid the jacket is prbably true to some degree anyway as all african americhimps are guily of serial rape murder and home invasions …seems like good solid reasoning to not have niggers in white neighborhoods ..readin the list of hot news off modernheretix and incogs weblinks one gets the impression that niggers are hunting us now ..so will white altruism really be to blame for our demise or will we parlay righteous self preservation instincts in whites to smash niggers wherever they are caught with their pants down or red handed …if attacked i know what i can do ..and i will do whatever it takes to keep on keepin on when people get in my way ….freedom requires body counts ..

  7. warren says:

    trade pollard for vannunu

  8. sog says:

    can i gat an amen ….

  9. angelo spumoni says:

    Goyim wish Jews were not so intelligent and shrewd so it would be easier to dispose of them. Wealthy Jewish Nazis pacified Hitler by giving him a few hundred thousand poverty stricken yids to work to death. But the wealthy Jews later claimed six million were gassed and got paid billions. One fake Yid got 10 million in compensation by claiming all of his relatives were gassed. The fake Yid was a goy whose relatives came to America on the Mayflower. He returned only half the money and avoided prosecution.

  10. ICU says:

    sog, Amen.

  11. indigoxxx1 says:

    Gang banging has been going on in Africa for over 50 thousand years. The sperm of ten men will almost always result in a pregnancy. Women that have been gangbanged in North America have become pregnant 95% of the time. Africans nerds that do not gangbang have a problem creating a pregnancy. Mother Nature is responsible for the evolving of the “GANGBANGING GENE”. Roaming clusters of horny African lovers have an all year long mating season, no arrests should interfere with the natural order.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *