Media Skypes Now Furiously “Niggerizing” America


By Phillip Marlowe (the INCOG MAN)

Just for the record, I usually don’t write out the word “Nigger” here on my site. I do this only because my father didn’t like his boys using such words (my evil “privileged” White upbringing). However, I don’t censor what my visitors say when it comes to these violent criminals. That being said, I cannot avoid not using the word as a made-up verb in my headline because it’s so perfect for what the hypocrite Jews are doing to us White Americans: “Niggerizing” our lands and our race right in front of our faces!

Man, just turn on the TV for five lousy minutes and you’ll see blacks plastered everywhere. Just think, these blacks even have their own special black network (BET), for crying out loud. And who’s the first to go, should they haven’t room because they want an “empowered” female onscreen? A White male, of course. White guys are now freely crapped on all over the media, too. No one dares say anything because of the “PC” mavens they’ve created within our own race to police each other — or simply nutso Jews gone psycho about Whites turning Nazi on their ass — as we should.

How about that commercial for GMC’s SUV, Acadia, where they have this full-blown orchestra playing a rousing symphony with the voiceover guy going on about precision, confidence, exactness, etc., etc., and then they cut to the symphony conductor, who just so happens to be a black guy. Amazing, since this primitive race only came up with skin-covered drums in their whole entire crappy African jungle culture.

Or how about that futuristic commercial for Hewlett Packard unveiling a new server, where they have a troop of Whites (with a green alien or two in the back ranks) wearing Star Trek uniforms dutifully following a tall smart black leader in an other worldly landscape, while he’s trying to explain the new technology to the White space dullards behind him. Yeah, sure, and I guess we just had soooooo many black super geniuses as part of the computer revolution back in the 70’s and 80’s? Riiiiight.

Anytime a black ever does the least thing good, media puts it up like it's such big news, like this story today of a black kid helping a blind old White man get across the street in Ohio. BFD. Just think of how many elderly White people have been robbed, raped and murdered by this criminal race over the years?

Anytime a black ever does the least thing good these days, the brainwashing media puts it up like it’s such big news, like this story today of a black kid merely helping a blind old White man get across a street in Ohio. BFD. Just think of how many elderly White people have been robbed, raped and viciously murdered by this criminal, brutal race over the years?

Just because these silly apes can use a computer mouse in a point and click computer interface or make calls on a cellphone or take ridiculous selfies in a bathroom mirror while holding stolen White-invented firearms doesn’t make them any kind of big high tech expert, even though they somehow think it does.

It’s amazing how racially stuck-up blacks get, once they master the most rudimentary of technologies. They actually believe their minor individual accomplishments goes to prove what wonderful brainiacs and citizens blacks make, even if their next door neighbor homie might murder them, or one of us Whites the next day.

So where’s all the blacks in control rooms when we’re doing real science in the solar system by programming remote-control space vehicles to comets and planets like Mars, Jupiter and even Pluto? Or how about astrophysics, cosmology, astronomy and theoretical subatomics? Serious science or engineering never has any blacks in the highest echelons because the race is basically semi-retarded over-all — with the smartest only relatively average as compared to Whites.

Blacks never make the grade, unless it’s due to special Affirmative Action programs advancing them over us decent White people who really deserve it. Oh, sure, we now got Neil Degrasse Tyson turned into some kind of science god by the Jew media when all he’s doing is reading off a teleprompter — probably from a script written by a White guy!

And just look at these ape’s faces: They are barely human — they look and act like a proto humanoid ape species from a million years ago. What’s infuriating is they are now making such proto humans the advanced race everywhere in the media.

On PBS’s NOVA this week, they broadcast a documentary called “Great Human Odyssey” where they actually employed a boot-lipped sub-Saharan black as an actor to portray the more advanced Homo Sapiens migrating into Europe, while the cruder, more caveman-looking Neanderthals still had White skin (at this point, they break to a side segment, lying to the audience that amounts of Melanin in the skin are the only difference in modern day humans).

This is BS, as anyone with half a brain can see there are plenty of major differences in races beside skin color.

Much of today's PC corrupted anthropology is due to this freaky looking Jew, Franz Boas.

Much of today’s PC-twisted anthropology is due to this crazy-looking old German Jew, Franz Boas, who started the “race doesn’t exist” BS. Jew intellectuals like this creep and that old Austrian Jew pervert, Sigmund Freud, are constantly touted by Jew media — most Whites don’t realize it’s always been a big Jew head job across the board!

No mention of the possibility of light skinned Homo Sapiens coming in from Eurasia, or anything about the already widely dispersed Homo Erectus populations and that the “punctuated equilibrium” evolutionary theory could easily mean Homo Sapiens evolved elsewhere and much earlier than Africa. Documentaries like this are designed to push the “Out of Africa” theory (part of the multicult dogma to elevate Negrohood). It’s just a theory but they never tell you that, only act as if it’s already established fact.

Jewry infiltrated anthropology long ago since they knew it would be an important component in the NWO racial brainwashing Agenda they had planned to use against the White race. They would have to control “the narrative” on college campuses and within intellectual circles — right along with intimidating any White scientists who dared contradict the artificial elevation of the Negro in our societies, even with solid, verifiable data.

What kills me is that it’s been well-proven blacks have far less IQ (70 in Africa, the slightly better 85 in American blacks versus 115 average for Whites) and even physical cranial capacity (skull size) than White Europeans (approximately 1250 cm in the black versus the White man’s 1430 cm).

They might be able to dance around like entertaining monkeys on stage and shoot hoops but that’s about it. Just think about how the media pushes this primitive race on us Whites all the time. It’s clearly a long-running program to subsume our noble race away.

Jew Media is truly destroying Whites

niggerizing-america-montageThis is just a few examples of the explicit race bias against Whites, instigated by Globalist Jewry and enforced by liberal multicults in the long-running effort to “niggerize” America and the White race. Hell, you can turn on the TV and see examples yourself in just a few minutes. We need to make these dirty rats pay!

jamie-foxx-siloImagine how Jew Hollywood sees no problem putting that super ugly, rat-faced black “actor,” Jamie Foxx (right), in as President hero of the US (“White House Down”). The lousy bastards can’t use Morgan Freeman as President and God all the time, so they had to come up with some other Negro actor, even if it’s Foxx, whom the media people knows openly expresses racist contempt for Whites all the time — especially among other blacks — all just for a little gangsta street cred, which is always so OK since brave blacks need to get down with the brothers once in awhile.

Foxx said during a SNL monologue that acting in “Django Unchained” was so great because he got to kill lots of White people. No one said a word. Foxx also said at a public NAACP awards ceremony blacks are the most talented race on the planet. Now if any White actor dared say something like that about the White race, all hell would break loose. The TV hypocrites would still be screaming bloody murder about the “racist White” actor on “The View” and “The Talk” to this day.

Will Smith is another White-hating, jug-eared arrogant Negro they put in everywhere as a big hero all the time. Seems anytime Jew media can find a black who can speak the least understandable English, the next thing you know, they are throwing mega shekels at him and putting him all over the airwaves. Because of that, the rest of blacks in America now think their race is so great. It’s ridiculous how much effect media BS has on black’s pointy little heads.

And if you analyze it straight up, you can easily see blacks are total racists. See, that’s the thing, blacks have always been inherently racist when it comes to blackness. Stupidly so, considering how moronic and animalistic the race really acts.

Also, the smart ones are only smart because they have some White in them, like Obama, for chrissakes. And the rest can only parrot liberal Jewish bull and pat themselves on the back for being a brilliant Negro. They each think they are shining examples of black superiority, when the reality is the race totally sucks.

Why America is going broke.

Yep, the black race clearly sucks. Big time.

These are murderous, low capacity, ape-like creatures, living fairly decently in the White-created civilization of the West (some have become quite rich due to PC). We need to ship these ugly, stinking, effin’ blacks straight on back to Africa just as soon as possible and wash our hands of this worthless race once and for all. We will indeed be much, much saner and better off without them crapping up our countries and us having to hear them whine about racism 24/7.

And just think how beautiful we can make our cities again!

Oh, yeah, BTW: Let’s ship the Jews to Africa right alongside the homies. Let them enjoy the fruits of their multicult BS!

Maybe they can walk to Israel from there. But we needn’t care what happens to the trouble-making rats. These self-centered devious bastards crapped up their beds in America royally — let them find another place on the planet to trash once again.

PS: I get along great with Asians and Hispanics. Why? Because they fully realize how worthless blacks are and agree completely with me.


Print Friendly
Download PDF


100% White boy born and bred in the USA. Dedicated to awakening Whites to all the crap being done to our decent, fair-minded race and exposing the devious brainwashing rats behind it all. Wake the ef up, White people!
This entry was posted in Jew Media, Negroes and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

31 Responses to Media Skypes Now Furiously “Niggerizing” America

  1. putnamvt says:

    White four-year old kids did more to build America than blacks. ( Niger = Latin for ‘black’.)

  2. Tom says:

    I wrote to RT about their constant praise for poor, oppressed U.S. negrosities aka googles. “You think they’re so great?” I asked, “Whites have thrown trillions at them since 1964 and, as far as I can see, it has been a total waste as they are still worthless. Why not offer them political asylum in Russia? See how YOU like it.” That shut them up for a while.

    As for the female google seein’ no reason to get off “weffare”–why should she? Blacks living in traditional high-welfare areas can stay on welfare indefinitely according to Federal rules. But evil, oppressive whitey (except for women with children under 18) can only stay on welfare for short periods during a 5-year time span UNLESS they live in a jungle bunny zone, which is nigh impossible. (I have done it.)

  3. Recon Ranger says:

    Hey Incog… Another right on the money dissertation…. I was just ranting this past week to my wife about all the niggers you see on commercials every night and I am sure all day as well… I’m watching the old shows on the tube ( Andy Griffith.. when America was great ) and so forth and during the commercial breaks I have to watch the niggers on the cereal commercials, the pizza commercials and on and on… I am sick to my stomach to see the jew media promote these lousy niggers as upstanding types as if they belong to the successful white society, go along with our mores and morals and fit in to the ” all American way of life.” As if they had real jobs and careers, sent the kids to good schools where they actually learned something and the fathers stayed at home with the family as the bread winner…. Real ” Leave it to Beaver types ” Yeah right… The one thing that really pisses me off is how they put these niggers in commercials sitting next to some white bitch as if it was all acceptable to have nigger homies with white bitches… What I can see is that the children of the youngest age like my grandchildren see this ( 4 years and up ) and they grow up to accept this as the norm… We are living in a very dangerous time and what we need is an all out ground war with these stupid and extremely low life animals… they need to be eradicated like the vermin they are… we will never convince them or force them to ship back to the jungle and we could never get the scum jews to follow… when a building has infestation of vermin the only way to eradicate the problem is to trap and kill… In our white situation as the ” new niggers ” the only way possible is to have a war to eradicate…we have too many ” wiggers ” who are sympathizers and they need to go as well… The question for me is only one and that is ” WHEN”… it’s coming whether our boy becomes president or not…. we need to be ready… watch the fucking jews go running when the bullets start flying… the day is near… and by the way since the NSA, and all the other spy agencies are now pushing hard to look at our e-mails along with mossad and all the other jew scum agencies,… my word to all of you is fuck your asses and the horses you rode in on… you’ll all be burning in hell soon….lock and load, shoot move and communicate….. HOO RAA.. AIRBORNE !!! RR

  4. Rosomaha says:

    Richard D.Fuerle ” Erectus Walks Amongst Us” – a great book, explains everything,/ even why Russians fall behind in technology and comfort ( building the roads, cleanness of villages and towns, etc)./
    Unfortunately, the propaganda is working – everyday I see more and more white girls with negro buck shopping, walking, etc, obviously engaged in intimate relationship.
    A few days ago saw a young white woman with three (!) little mongrels.
    I live in US since 1996 and never, never witnessed such niggerization before !
    Also interesting those white women for some reason always choose their mating nigger as ugliest and filthiness and unkept as possible.

  5. Red Pill says:

    Trump-Inspired Pepe The Frog Billboards To Hit Battleground State

    Fans of the alt-right mascot — which critics dub a racist hate symbol — have raised enough money to place a Pepe cartoon in support of Donald Trump on a handful of digital billboards in Pennsylvania, a crowdfunding site claims. Donors on the platform WeSearchr drummed up $5,000 for the ad buy, which the site’s founders say could begin appearing off of highways in the state as early as next wee

  6. Hoff says:

    Rabbi endorse muslims against white people. Blacks, muslims, any darkskinned immigrants are the jews bio-weapons against the white race.

    Rabbi Moses Hess, Karl Marx and Herzl mentor got that figured out in the 1850s. It’s all about race. Herzl did the race part, political zionism. Everything in political zionism is about the jewish race superiority.

    Moses Hess said that class is secund, and he was right. What Karl Marx did was that he focused on class and made it goyim main thinking by writing an updated version of the jews Talmud for goyim consumption. Communism is jew Talmudism that focus on classes.

    Political zionism is all about jews controlling everything and that is the jewish race.

    The jewish fraud communism/Marxism is all about making goyim infighting and focus on anything but the real issue – race.

    Rabbi: Jews are fighting alongside their Muslim brothers against Old Europe –2 min

  7. putnamvt says:

    The simplest explanation that covers the given facts is that jews control the west, they hate whites, and they are trying to genocide them.

  8. Hoff says:

    Sheldon Adelson: The jewish race is the most important thing.


    Sheldon Adelson on Acceptance and Assimilation –One minute

  9. Hoff says:

    The jews plan is to exterminate the white race.

    The first stepping stone is to make the white race a physical minority in their own country. The rest is easy. White people are now very close to be a physical minority in their own country and this is a fact that none can deny.

    Once a minority, see Haiti when the ni66ers took charge and killed all white and mulattos. To this day there is not one single mulatto in all of Haiti. And that is a fact none can deny.

  10. Hoff says:

    I will make a prediction, in ten years (((Jew York Times))) will anounce with smug glee that white people is now a physical minority in America.

    Ten, top 15 years from now.

    If you think the noggers are bad today, just wait until whites is a minority, the jews will unleash their pet ni66ger pitbulls all out on white people.

  11. protocolsRtrue says:

    So my stupid story goes on nuclear missile security guards at 20 below zero the officer in the capsule says the alarm went off on silo 12 sure it’s going to be a dead rabbit when I get there. So me and the other guy no women back then are watching this missile silo why did the maintenance guys leave the gate unlocked and why are the lights on ? So we are in the truck and he says he hates my fucking guts and is about to shoot me with his m16 and I say I hate your fucking guts also and I am locked and loaded also with mine and will drill a new hole in your head in a heartbeat if you even move your arm. My eyes and reflexes were better back then. That’s why they didn’t put women in our trucks just a détente mutual mad destruction two man concept.

  12. bjw says:

    TV is almost 100% propaganda, political correctness, lies, etc.

    during a football game, 1 of the commentators said “the defense is smart and disciplined”. the defense was nothing but negroids. the comment was insanely unrealistic. the negroid race has proven itself to be the exact opposite of”smart and disciplined”.

    in reality, the nordic race is “smart and disciplined”.

    it’s an example of how political correctness is being used to sabotage white countries.

  13. Hoff says:

    That’s close, very very close.

    Crosswind landing results in almost crash / hard touchdown + go around

  14. Israhell on Earth says:

    Red Ice Live – Michael Hoffman on “Denial,” new Movie about “Holocaust Denier” David Irving

    I could listen to Michael Hoffman for hours, despite my atrocious english (writing) skills, i usually understand every word. I have to use the google translator though when reading his articles on

    DENIAL Movie Reviewed by Eric Hunt

    I can’t watch the video here in Austria, but i love Eric Hunt’s work and i’m confident that he hammers more nails in the holocoffin.

  15. protocolsRtrue says:

    Stupid story chapter 22. Why they didn’t allow women in the missile security fields. Can you imagine being stuck in a truck with a woman who is pmsing and it’s 40 degrees below zero guarding this missile silo in the middle of bumbfuck nowhere? And she starts bitching about her husband and bitching about her boyfriend and bitching about she bounced a check at the commissary and her credit card got rejected at jc penny and her high school reunion is coming up what kind of dress should I get do you like my hair color? I would be like would you just shut the fuck up for a minute can’t you see I’m trying to take a nap here? OK I know it’s 40 degrees below zero outside this truck with the wind chill but I have to go take a leak. Then I go out and shoot myself in the head.

  16. protocolsRtrue says:

    Bitch would you shut the fuck up with your bitching and whining and moaning and complaining I’m trying to take a nap here. Wake me up if you see the rabbit that set off this alarm in the first place so I can go shoot it because you know how rabbits are. What’s that supposed to mean? I say well one day you have 2 rabbits and the next day you have twelve rabbits and the next day you have 150 rabbits oh never mind. That’s a sexist racist white Nazi supremacist statement and what kind of irredeemable deplorable person would shoot an innocent little bunny rabbit in the first place? A person like me and I will shoot every fucking one of the rabbits in this county and bambis too if it means I don’t have to come back out here and sit in this truck with you for the next four days.

  17. Karen says:

    The plan is for the top 2% to rule over a low IQ, brutal, materialistic (in the most primal sense- food, sex) horde of easily manipulated slaves. Whites are the only peoples capable of preventing this, which is why they are being eliminated first. Remember, Goy =Cattle and cattle are branded and penned.
    This paleo diet that’s being pushed on the premise that hunter gatherers were healthy until agriculture arrived. Well, it wasn’t agriculture, but sugar, refined grains, processing and gmo’s that did us in. The real reason that this ridiculous diet is being pushed to the sheep is over population and profits. Factory farming is much more profitable (cramped quarters, growth hormones etc.) whereas acres of waving grains utilize agricultural land which can be ‘better’ utilized by knocking up shoddy housing units for the 3rd worlders overtaking our countries, and the many steps in processing grains from field to market is less profitable than factory farms here only 2 steps are involved, slaughterhouse to market. Soon enough they will find a way to convince you that Soylent Green is the best new diet.

  18. Johnny Draco says:

    jewoogle Says Only ‘White People’ Can Be Racist While Confirming That ‘Reverse Racism DOES NOT Exist’

  19. Smitherines says:

    Report: Clinton Mulled Killing Wikileaks’ Julian Assange With A Drone Strike
    Matt Vespa
    Matt Vespa
    Posted: Oct 03, 2016 7:00 PM

    Okay—I want to start by saying that this isn’t verified, but it looks as if Clinton mulled whether to take out Wikileaks’ Julian Assange through a drone strike. Assange’s organization published scores of emails from the Democratic National Committee prior to the party’s convention in Philadelphia, showing that DNC officials discussed ways to torpedo Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) presidential campaign. That led to multiple resignations from the committee’s executive leadership.

    More @ Link below:

  20. Smitherines says:

    Hillary Clinton on Assange “Can’t we just drone this guy”

  21. The opinion of trust says:

    These elections is the last chance for the better future. This election is the last chance to defeat the darkness by electing politicians, and not through bloodshed. Therefore, every white person out there even Aleuts, go and vote. Even if you do not have legs anymore, ask your girlfriend to give you a ride and vote.

    But, if you an idiot how are you going to know whom to vote for?

    Here is a clue: vote for white people. If there are several people and you are unsure whom to vote, here is another clue for you: vote for the white boy. If you still uncertain, then go on, here you will get all the guidance necessary.

    With us here at live is not convoluted, it is straightforward. We are simple people with simple goals here. And we do not make a fun of idiots.

  22. The opinion you trust says:

    It is important to have trust among the participants. Previously I said that I do not care if we trust each other or not, as long as we have a shared vision – the world without negros, niggers, latinos, jews, and african-americans. That was a mistake. On the second thought, trust is clearly important in any group which is determined to achieve the common goals.

  23. The opinion you trust says:

    Message to all idiots out there.

    These elections is the last chance for the better future. This election is the last chance to defeat the darkness by electing politicians, and not through bloodshed. Therefore, every white person out there even Aleuts, go and vote. Even if you do not have legs anymore, ask your girlfriend to give you a ride and vote.

    But, if you an idiot how are you going to know whom to vote for?

    Here is a clue: vote for white people. If there are several people and you are unsure whom to vote, here is another clue for you: vote for the white boy. If you still uncertain, then go on, here you will get all the guidance necessary.

    With us here at live is not convoluted, it is straightforward. We are simple people with simple goals here. And we do not make a fun of idiots.

  24. The opinion you trust says:

    Good olod American General…

    War Is A Racket By Major General Smedley Butler.
    Chapter 1: War Is A Racket.
    Chapter 2: Who Makes The Profits?
    Chapter 3: Who Pays The Bills?
    Chapter 4: How To Smash This Racket!
    Chapter 5: To Hell With War!
    Smedley Darlington Butler
    Born: West Chester, Pa., July 30, 1881 Educated: Haverford School
    Married: Ethel C. Peters, of Philadelphia, June 30, 1905 Awarded two congressional medals of honor:
    capture of Vera Cruz, Mexico, 1914
    capture of Ft. Riviere, Haiti, 1917
    Distinguished service medal, 1919
    Major General – United States Marine Corps Retired Oct. 1, 1931
    On leave of absence to act as director of Dept. of Safety, Philadelphia, 1932 Lecturer — 1930’s;
    Republican Candidate for Senate, 1932;
    Died at Naval Hospital, Philadelphia, June 21, 1940
    For more information about Major General Butler, contact the United States Marine Corps.
    WAR is a racket. It always has been.
    It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.
    A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small “inside” group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many:
    Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.
    In the World War 1 a mere handful garnered the profits of the conflict. At least 21,000 new millionaires and billionaires were made in the United States during the World War 1:
    That many admitted their huge blood gains in their income tax returns;
    How many other war millionaires falsified their tax returns no one knows;
    How many of these war millionaires shouldered a rifle? How many of them parried a bayonet thrust of an enemy? How many of them were wounded or killed in battle?
    Out of war nations acquire additional territory, if they are victorious. They just take it:
    This newly acquired territory promptly is exploited by the few — the selfsame few who wrung dollars out of blood in the war;
    The general public shoulders the bill. And what is this bill?:
    this bill renders a horrible accounting;
    Newly placed gravestones.
    Mangled bodies. Shattered minds. Broken hearts and homes.
    Economic instability. Depression and all its attendant miseries.
    Back-breaking taxation for generations and generations.
    For a great many years, as a soldier, I had a suspicion that war was a racket; not until I retired to civil life did I fully realize it. Now that I see the international war clouds gathering, as they are today, I must face it and speak out. All of them are looking ahead to war. Not the people, not those who fight and pay and die, only those who foment wars and remain safely at home to profit.
    Again they are choosing sides:
    France and Russia met and agreed to stand side by side.
    Italy and Austria hurried to make a similar agreement.
    Poland and Germany cast sheep’s eyes at each other, forgetting for the nonce [one unique occasion], their dispute over the Polish Corridor.
    The assassination of King Alexander of Yugoslavia complicated matters. Yugoslavia and Hungary, long bitter enemies, were almost at each other’s throats.
    Italy was ready to jump in. But France was waiting. So was Czechoslovakia.
    There are 40,000,000 men under arms in the world today, and our statesmen and diplomats have the temerity to say that war is not in the making:
    Hell’s bells! Are these 40,000,000 men being trained to be dancers?
    Not in Italy, to be sure. Premier Mussolini knows what they are being trained for. He, at least, is frank enough to speak out. Only the other day, Duce in “International Conciliation,” the publication of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said: “War alone brings up to its highest tension all human energy and puts the stamp of nobility upon the people who have the courage to meet it.” Undoubtedly Mussolini means exactly what he says. His well-trained army, his great fleet of planes, and even his navy are ready for war — anxious for it, apparently. His recent stand at the side of Hungary in the latter’s dispute with Yugoslavia showed that. And the hurried mobilization of his troops on the Austrian border after the assassination of Dollfuss showed it too.
    Herr Hitler, with his rearming Germany and his constant demands for more and more arms, is an equal if not greater threat to peace.
    France only recently increased the term of military service for its youth from a year to eighteen months.
    There are others in Europe too whose sabre rattling presages war, sooner or later. Yes, all over, nations are camping in their arms. The mad dogs of Europe are on the loose.
    In the Orient the maneuvering is more adroit. Back in 1904:
    when Russia and Japan fought, we kicked out our old friends the Russians and backed Japan. Then our very generous international bankers were financing Japan, but
    now the trend is to position us against the Japanese.
    What does the “open door” policy to China mean to us? Our trade with China is about $90,000,000 a year.
    Or the Philippine Islands? We have spent about $600,000,000 in the Philippines in thirty-five years and we (our bankers and industrialists and speculators) have private investments there of less than $200,000,000.
    Reason to go to war:
    Then, to save that China trade of about $90,000,000, or to protect these private investments of less than $200,000,000 in the Philippines, we would be all stirred up to hate Japan and go to war, a war that might well cost us:
    tens of billions of dollars,
    hundreds of thousands of lives of Americans, and
    many more hundreds of thousands of physically mutilated and mentally unbalanced men.
    Of course, for this loss, there would be a compensating profit – billion dollars fortunes would be made by a few:
    munitions makers,
    ship builders,
    meat packers,
    They would fare well. Yes, they are getting ready for another war. Why shouldn’t they? It pays high dividends, but:
    What does it profit the men who are killed? What does it profit their mothers and sisters, their wives and their sweethearts? What does it profit their children?
    What does it profit anyone except the very few to whom war means huge profits?
    Yes, and what does it profit the nation?
    Take our own case. Until 1898:
    we didn’t own a bit of territory outside the mainland of North America,
    and at that time our national debt was a little more than $1,000,000,000.
    Then we became internationally minded. We forgot, or shunted aside, the advice of the Father of our country, George Washington’s warning about entangling alliances. We went to war. We acquired outside territory. At the end of the World War period, as a direct result of our fiddling in international affairs, our national debt had jumped to over $25,000,000,000.
    Does war it worth it?
    Our total favorable trade balance during the twenty-five-year period was about $24,000,000,000.
    Therefore, on a purely bookkeeping basis, we ran a little behind year for year, and that foreign trade might well have been ours without the wars.
    It would have been far cheaper, not to say safer, for the average American who pays the bills to stay out of foreign entanglements.
    For a very few this war racket, like bootlegging and other underworld rackets, brings fancy profits, but the cost of operations is always transferred to the people — who do not profit.
    Who Makes The Profits?
    The World War, rather our brief participation in it, has cost the United States some $52,000,000,000. Figure it out. That means $400 to every American man, woman, and child. And we haven’t paid the debt yet. We are paying it, our children will pay it, and our children’s children probably still will be paying the cost of that war.
    Profits of a business in the United States are:
    the normal profits are six, eight, ten, and sometimes 12%, but
    war-time profits is another matter, 20%, 60%, 100% and even 800%, the sky is the limit.
    All that traffic will bear. Uncle Sam has the money. Let’s get it. Of course, it isn’t put that crudely in war time. It is dressed into speeches about patriotism, love of country, and “we must all put our shoulders to the wheel,” but the profits jump and leap and skyrocket — and are safely pocketed. Let’s just take a few examples.
    Take our friends the du Ponts, the powder people, didn’t one of them testify before a Senate committee recently that their powder won the war? Or saved the world for democracy? Or something? How did they do in the war? They were a patriotic corporation.
    Well, the average earnings of the du Ponts:
    for the period 1910 to 1914 were $6,000,000 a year. It wasn’t much, but the du Ponts managed to get along on it. Now let’s look at their average yearly profit during the
    war years, 1914 to 1918, $58 million dollars a year profit we find! Nearly ten times that of normal times, and the profits of normal times were pretty good. An increase in profits of more than 950%.
    Take one of our little steel companies that patriotically shunted aside the making of rails and girders and bridges to manufacture war materials. Well, their 1910-1914 yearly earnings averaged $6,000,000. Then came the war. And, like loyal citizens, Bethlehem Steel promptly turned to munitions making. Did their profits jump — or did they let Uncle Sam in for a bargain? Well, their 1914-1918 average was $49,000,000 a year!
    Or, let’s take United States Steel. The normal earnings during the five-year period prior to the war were $105,000,000 a year. Not bad. Then along came the war and up went the profits. The average yearly profit for the period 1914-1918 was $240,000,000. Not bad.
    There you have some of the steel and powder earnings. Let’s look at something else. A little copper, perhaps. That always does well in war times:
    Anaconda, for instance. Average yearly earnings during the pre-war years 1910-1914 of $10,000,000. During the war years 1914-1918 profits leaped to $34,000,000 per year.
    Or Utah Copper. Average of $5,000,000 per year during the 1910-1914 period. Jumped to an average of $21,000,000 yearly profits for the war period.
    Let’s group these five, with three smaller companies. The total yearly average profits of the pre-war period 1910-1914 were $137,480,000. Then along came the war. The average yearly profits for this group skyrocketed to $408,300,000. A little increase in profits of approximately 200 per cent.
    Does war pay? It paid them. But they aren’t the only ones. There are still others:
    Let’s take leather. For the three-year period before the war the total profits of Central Leather Company were $3,500,000. That was approximately $1,167,000 a year. Well, in 1916 Central Leather returned a profit of $15,000,000, a small increase of 1,100 per cent. That’s all.
    The General Chemical Company averaged a profit for the three years before the war of a little over $800,000 a year. Came the war, and the profits jumped to $12,000,000. a leap of 1,400 per cent.]International Nickel Company — and you can’t have a war without nickel — showed an increase in profits from a mere average of $4,000,000 a year to $73,000,000 yearly. Not bad? An increase of more than 1,700 per cent.
    American Sugar Refining Company averaged $2,000,000 a year for the three years before the war. In 1916 a profit of $6,000,000 was recorded.
    Listen to Senate Document No. 259. The Sixty-Fifth Congress, reporting on corporate earnings and government revenues. Considering the profits of 122 meat packers, 153 cotton manufacturers, 299 garment makers, 49 steel plants, and 340 coal producers during the war.
    Profits under 25% were exceptional.
    For instance the coal companies made between 100% and 7,856% on their capital stock during the war.
    The Chicago packers doubled and tripled their earnings.
    And let us not forget the bankers who financed the great war. If anyone had the cream of the profits it was the bankers. Being partnerships rather than incorporated organizations, they do not have to report to stockholders. And their profits were as secret as they were immense. How the bankers made their millions and their billions I do not know, because those little secrets never become public, even before a Senate investigatory body.
    But here’s how some of the other patriotic industrialists and speculators carved their way into war profits.
    Take the shoe people. They like war. It brings business with abnormal profits. They made huge profits on sales abroad to our allies.
    Perhaps, like the munitions manufacturers and armament makers, they also sold to the enemy. For a dollar is a dollar whether it comes from Germany or from France.
    But they did well by Uncle Sam too. For instance, they sold Uncle Sam 35,000,000 pairs of hobnailed service shoes. There were 4,000,000 soldiers. Eight pairs, and more, to a soldier. My regiment during the war had only one pair to a soldier. Some of these shoes probably are still in existence. They were good shoes. But when the war was over Uncle Sam has a matter of 25,000,000 pairs left over. Bought — and paid for. Profits recorded and pocketed.
    There was still lots of leather left. So the leather people sold your Uncle Sam hundreds of thousands of McClellan saddles for the cavalry. But there wasn’t any American cavalry overseas! Somebody had to get rid of this leather, however. Somebody had to make a profit in it — so we had a lot of McClellan saddles. And we probably have those yet.
    Also somebody had a lot of mosquito netting. They sold your Uncle Sam 20,000,000 mosquito nets for the use of the soldiers overseas. I suppose the boys were expected to put it over them as they tried to sleep in muddy trenches — one hand scratching cooties on their backs and the other making passes at scurrying rats. Well, not one of these mosquito nets ever got to France. Anyhow, these thoughtful manufacturers wanted to make sure that no soldier would be without his mosquito net, so 40,000,000 additional yards of mosquito netting were sold to Uncle Sam.
    There were pretty good profits in mosquito netting in those days, even if there were no mosquitoes in France. I suppose, if the war had lasted just a little longer, the enterprising mosquito netting manufacturers would have sold your Uncle Sam a couple of consignments of mosquitoes to plant in France so that more mosquito netting would be in order.
    Airplane and engine manufacturers felt they, too, should get their just profits out of this war. Why not? Everybody else was getting theirs. So $1,000,000,000, count them if you live long enough, was spent by Uncle Sam in building airplane engines that never left the ground! Not one plane, or motor, out of the billion dollars’ worth ordered, ever got into a battle in France. Just the same the manufacturers made their little profit of 30, 100, or perhaps 300%.
    Undershirts for soldiers cost 14¢ [cents] to make and uncle Sam paid 30¢ to 40¢ each for them — a nice little profit for the undershirt manufacturer. And the stocking manufacturer and the uniform manufacturers and the cap manufacturers and the steel helmet manufacturers, all got theirs.
    Why, when the war was over some 4,000,000 sets of equipment — knapsacks and the things that go to fill them — crammed warehouses on this side. Now they are being scrapped because the regulations have changed the contents. But the manufacturers collected their wartime profits on them — and they will do it all over again the next time.
    There were lots of brilliant ideas for profit making during the war.
    One very versatile patriot sold Uncle Sam twelve dozen 48-inch wrenches. Oh, they were very nice wrenches. The only trouble was that there was only one nut ever made that was large enough for these wrenches. That is the one that holds the turbines at Niagara Falls. Well, after Uncle Sam had bought them and the manufacturer had pocketed the profit, the wrenches were put on freight cars and shunted all around the United States in an effort to find a use for them. When the Armistice was signed it was indeed a sad blow to the wrench manufacturer. He was just about to make some nuts to fit the wrenches. Then he planned to sell these, too, to your Uncle Sam.
    Still another had the brilliant idea that colonels shouldn’t ride in automobiles, nor should they even ride on horseback. One has probably seen a picture of Andy Jackson riding in a buckboard. Well, some 6,000 buckboards were sold to Uncle Sam for the use of colonels! Not one of them was used. But the buckboard manufacturer got his war profit.
    The shipbuilders felt they should come in on some of it, too. They built a lot of ships that made a lot of profit. More than $3,000,000,000 worth. Some of the ships were all right. But $635,000,000 worth of them were made of wood and wouldn’t float! The seams opened up, and they sank. We paid for them, though. And somebody pocketed the profits.
    It has been estimated by statisticians and economists and researchers that the war:
    cost your Uncle Sam $52,000,000,000.
    Of this sum, $39,000,000,000 was expended in the actual war itself.
    This expenditure yielded $16,000,000,000 in profits. That is how the 21,000 billionaires and millionaires got that way. This $16,000,000,000 profits is not to be sneezed at. It is quite a tidy sum. And it went to a very few.
    The Senate (Nye) committee probe of the munitions industry and its wartime profits, despite its sensational disclosures:
    hardly has scratched the surface, even so, it
    has had some effect.
    The State Department has been studying “for some time” methods of keeping out of war. The War Department suddenly decides it has a wonderful plan to spring. The Administration names a committee, with the War and Navy Departments ably represented under the chairmanship of a Wall Street speculator, to limit profits in war time. To what extent isn’t suggested. Hmmm. Possibly the profits of 300 and 600 and 1,600% of those who turned blood into gold in the World War would be limited to some smaller figure.
    Apparently, however, the plan does not call for any limitation of losses of those who fight the war. As far as I have been able to ascertain there is nothing in the scheme to limit a soldier to the loss of but one eye, or one arm, or to limit his wounds to one or two or three. Or to limit the loss of life. There is nothing in this scheme, apparently, that says:
    not more than 12% of a regiment shall be wounded in battle, or that
    not more than 7% in a division shall be killed.
    Of course, the committee cannot be bothered with such trifling matters.
    Who Pays The Bills?
    Who provides the profits — these nice little profits of 20, 100, 300, 1,500 and 1,800?
    We all pay them:
    in taxation.
    We paid the bankers their profits when we bought Liberty Bonds at $100.00 and sold them back at $84 or $86 to the bankers. These bankers collected $100 plus. It was a simple manipulation. The bankers control the security marts:
    It was easy for them to depress the price of these bonds. Then all of us, the people, got frightened and sold the bonds at $84 or $86. The bankers bought them.
    Then these same bankers stimulated a boom and government bonds went to par and above. Then the bankers collected their profits.
    But the soldier pays the biggest part of the bill:
    If you don’t believe this, visit the American cemeteries on the battlefields abroad. Or visit any of the veteran’s hospitals in the United States. On a tour of the country, in the midst of which I am at the time of this writing, I have visited eighteen government hospitals for veterans. In them are a total of about 50,000 destroyed men, who were the pick of the nation eighteen years ago. The very able chief surgeon at the government hospital; at Milwaukee, where there are 3,800 of the living dead, told me that mortality among veterans is three times as great as among those who stayed at home. Boys with a normal viewpoint were taken out of the fields and offices and factories and classrooms and put into the ranks. There they were remolded; they were made over; they were made to “about face”; to regard murder as the order of the day. They were put shoulder to shoulder and, through mass psychology, they were entirely changed.
    We used them for a couple of years and trained them to think nothing at all of killing or of being killed.
    Then, suddenly, we discharged them and told them to make another “about face”.
    This time they had to do their own readjustment, sans [without] mass psychology, sans officers’ aid and advice and sans nation-wide propaganda. We didn’t need them anymore. So we scattered them about without any “three-minute” or “Liberty Loan” speeches or parades. Many, too many, of these fine young boys are eventually destroyed mentally, because they could not make that final “about face” alone. In the government hospital in Marion, Indiana, 1,800 of these boys are in pens. Five hundred of them in a barracks with steel bars and wires all around outside the buildings and on the porches. These already have been mentally destroyed. These boys don’t even look like human beings. Oh, the looks on their faces. Physically, they are in good shape; mentally, they are gone. There are thousands and thousands of these cases, and more and more are coming in all the time. The tremendous excitement of the war, the sudden cutting off (Me – that is it – he named it – all these PTSD bullshit is all about that the service is good and exciting like a drug, and then you cut it and that results in mental) of that excitement — the young boys couldn’t stand it.
    That’s a part of the bill. So much for the dead — they have paid their part of the war profits. So much for the mentally and physically wounded — they are paying now their share of the war profits. But the others paid, too — they paid with heartbreaks when they tore themselves away from their families to don the uniform of Uncle Sam — on which a profit had been made.
    They paid another part in the training camps where they were regimented and drilled while others took their jobs and their places in the lives of their communities. The paid for it in the trenches where they shot and were shot; where they were hungry for days at a time; where they slept in the mud and the cold and in the rain — with the moans and shrieks of the dying for a horrible lullaby. But don’t forget — the soldier paid part of the dollars and cents bill too.
    Up to and including the Spanish-American War, we had a prize system, and soldiers and sailors fought for money. During the Civil War they were paid bonuses, in many instances, before they went into service. The government, or states, paid as high as $1,200 for an enlistment. In the Spanish-American War they gave prize money. When we captured any vessels, the soldiers all got their share — at least, they were supposed to.
    Then it was found that we could reduce the cost of wars by taking all the prize money and keeping it, but conscripting [drafting] the soldier anyway. Then soldiers couldn’t bargain for their labor. Everyone else could bargain, but the soldier couldn’t.
    Napoleon once said: “All men are enamored of decorations they positively hunger for them”. So by developing the Napoleonic system, the medal business, the government learned it could get soldiers for less money, because the boys liked to be decorated. Until the Civil War there were no medals. Then the Congressional Medal of Honor was handed out. It made enlistments easier. After the Civil War no new medals were issued until the Spanish-American War.
    In the World War, we used propaganda to make the boys accept conscription. They were made to feel ashamed if they didn’t join the army. So vicious was this war propaganda that even God was brought into it. With few exceptions our clergymen joined in the clamor to kill, kill, kill. To kill the Germans. God is on our side it is His will that the Germans be killed.
    And in Germany, the good pastors called upon the Germans to kill the allies to please the same God. That was a part of the general propaganda, built up to make people war conscious and murder conscious. Beautiful ideals were painted for our boys who were sent out to die:
    This was the war to end all wars.
    This was the war to make the world safe for democracy.
    No one mentioned to them, as they marched away, that their going and their dying would mean huge war profits. No one told these American soldiers that they might be shot down by bullets made by their own brothers here. No one told them that the ships on which they were going to cross might be torpedoed by submarines built with United States patents. They were just told it was to be a glorious adventure.
    Thus, having stuffed patriotism down their throats, it was decided to make them help pay for the war, too. So, we gave them the large salary of $30 a month. All they had to do for this munificent sum was to leave their dear ones behind, give up their jobs, lie in swampy trenches, eat canned willy (when they could get it) and kill and kill and kill and be killed:
    But wait. Half of that wage (just a little more than a riveter in a shipyard or a laborer in a munitions factory safe at home made in a day) was promptly taken from him to support his dependents, so that they would not become a charge upon his community.
    Then we made him pay what amounted to accident insurance — something the employer pays for in an enlightened state — and that cost him $6 a month. He had less than $9 a month left.
    Then, the most crowning insolence of all — he was virtually blackjacked into paying for his own ammunition, clothing, and food by being made to buy Liberty Bonds. Most soldiers got no money at all on pay days.
    We made them buy Liberty Bonds at $100 and then we bought them back — when they came back from the war and couldn’t find work — at $84 and $86. And the soldiers bought about $2,000,000,000 worth of these bonds!
    Yes, the soldier pays the greater part of the bill. His family pays too. They pay it in the same heart-break that he does. As he suffers, they suffer. At nights, as he lay in the trenches and watched shrapnel burst about him, they lay home in their beds and tossed sleeplessly — his father, his mother, his wife, his sisters, his brothers, his sons, and his daughters.
    When he returned home minus an eye, or minus a leg or with his mind broken, they suffered too — as much as and even sometimes more than he. Yes, and they, too, contributed their dollars to the profits of the munitions makers and bankers and shipbuilders and the manufacturers and the speculators made. They, too, bought Liberty Bonds and contributed to the profit of the bankers after the Armistice in the hocus-pocus of manipulated Liberty Bond prices.
    And even now the families of the wounded men and of the mentally broken and those who never were able to readjust themselves are still suffering and still paying.
    How To Smash This Racket?
    WELL, it’s a racket, all right.
    A few profit — and the many pay. But there is a way to stop it. You can’t end it by disarmament conferences. You can’t eliminate it by peace parleys at Geneva. Well-meaning but impractical groups can’t wipe it out by resolutions. It can be smashed effectively only by taking the profit out of war.
    The only way to smash this racket is to conscript capital and industry and labor before the nations manhood can be conscripted. One month before the Government can conscript the young men of the nation, it must conscript capital and industry and labor. Let the officers and the directors and the high-powered executives of our armament factories and our munitions makers and our shipbuilders and our airplane builders and the manufacturers of all the other things that provide profit in war time as well as the bankers and the speculators, be conscripted — to get $30 a month, the same wage as the lads in the trenches get.
    Let the workers in these plants get the same wages — all the workers, all presidents, all executives, all directors, all managers, all bankers — yes, and all generals and all admirals and all officers and all politicians and all government office holders — everyone in the nation be restricted to a total monthly income not to exceed that paid to the soldier in the trenches.
    Let all these kings and tycoons and masters of business and all those workers in industry and all our senators and governors and majors pay:
    pay half of their monthly $30 wage to their families, and
    pay war risk insurance, and
    buy Liberty Bonds.
    Why shouldn’t they?
    They aren’t running any risk of being killed or of having their bodies mangled or their minds shattered. They aren’t sleeping in muddy trenches. They aren’t hungry. The soldiers are!
    Give capital and industry and labor thirty days to think it over and you will find, by that time, there will be no war. That will smash the war racket — that and nothing else.
    Maybe I am a little too optimistic. Capital still has some say. So capital won’t permit the taking of the profit out of war until the people — those who do the suffering and still pay the price – make up their minds who shall do their biddings:
    those they elect to office shall do their bidding, and
    not that of the profiteers.
    Another step necessary in this fight to smash the war racket is the limited referendum to determine whether a war should be declared. A referendum:
    not of all the voters, but
    merely of those who would be called upon to do the fighting and dying.
    There wouldn’t be very much sense in having a:
    76-year-old president of a munitions factory, or the
    flat-footed head of an international banking firm, or the
    cross-eyed manager of a uniform manufacturing plant — all of whom see visions of tremendous profits in the event of war — voting on whether the nation should go to war or not.
    They never would be called upon to shoulder arms — to sleep in a trench and to be shot. Only those who would be called upon to risk their lives for their country should have the privilege of voting to determine whether the nation should go to war.
    There is ample precedent for restricting the voting to those affected. Many of our states have restrictions on those permitted to vote. In most, it is necessary to be able to read and write before you may vote. In some, you must own property. It would be a simple matter each year for the men coming of military age to register in their communities as they did in the draft during the World War and be examined physically. Those who could pass and who would therefore be called upon to bear arms in the event of war would be eligible to vote in a limited plebiscite. They should be the ones to have the power to decide — and not a Congress few of whose members are within the age limit and fewer still of whom are in physical condition to bear arms. Only those who must suffer should have the right to vote.
    A third step in this business of smashing the war racket is to make certain that our military forces are truly forces for defense only. At each session of Congress the question of further naval appropriations comes up. The swivel-chair admirals of Washington (and there are always a lot of them) are very smart and adroit lobbyists:
    They don’t shout that “We need a lot of battleships to war on this nation or that nation.” Oh no.
    First of all, they let it be known that America is menaced by a great naval power. Almost any day, these admirals will tell you, the great fleet of this supposed enemy will strike suddenly and annihilate 125,000,000 people. Just like that.
    Then they begin to cry for a larger navy. For what? To fight the enemy? Oh my, no. Oh, no. For defense purposes only.
    Then, incidentally, they announce maneuvers in the Pacific. For defense. Uh, huh:
    The Pacific is a great big ocean. We have a tremendous coastline on the Pacific.
    Will the maneuvers be off the coast, two or three hundred miles? Oh, no. The maneuvers will be two thousand, yes, perhaps even thirty-five hundred miles, off the coast.
    The Japanese, a proud people, of course will be pleased beyond expression to see the united States fleet so close to Nippon’s shores. Even as pleased as would be the residents of California were they to dimly discern through the morning mist, the Japanese fleet playing at war games off Los Angeles.
    The ships of our navy, it can be seen, should be specifically limited, by law, to within 200 miles of our coastline. Had that been the law in 1898 the Maine would never have gone to Havana Harbor. She never would have been blown up. There would have been no war with Spain with its attendant loss of life. Two hundred miles is ample, in the opinion of experts, for defense purposes. Our nation cannot start an offensive war if its ships can’t go further than 200 miles from the coastline. Planes might be permitted to go as far as 500 miles from the coast for purposes of reconnaissance.
    And the army should never leave the territorial limits of our nation.
    To summarize: Three steps must be taken to smash the war racket:
    We must take the profit out of war.
    We must permit the youth of the land who would bear arms to decide whether or not there should be war.
    We must limit our military forces to home defense purposes.
    To Hell With War!
    I am not a fool as to believe that war is a thing of the past:
    I know the people do not want war, but
    there is no use in saying we cannot be pushed into another war.
    Looking back, Woodrow Wilson was re-elected president in 1916 on a platform that he had “kept us out of war” and on the implied promise that he would “keep us out of war.” Yet, five months later he asked Congress to declare war on Germany.
    In that five-month interval the people had not been asked whether they had changed their minds. The 4,000,000 young men who put on uniforms and marched or sailed away were not asked whether they wanted to go forth to suffer and die.
    Then what caused our government to change its mind so suddenly? Money. An allied commission, it may be recalled, came over shortly before the war declaration and called on the President. The President summoned a group of advisers. The head of the commission spoke. Stripped of its diplomatic language, this is what he told the President and his group:
    “There is no use kidding ourselves any longer. The cause of the allies is lost. We now owe you (American bankers, American munitions makers, American manufacturers, American speculators, American exporters) five or six billion dollars.
    If we lose (and without the help of the United States we must lose) we, England, France and Italy, cannot pay back this money and Germany won’t. So”:
    Had secrecy been outlawed as far as war negotiations were concerned, and
    had the press been invited to be present at that conference, or
    had radio been available to broadcast the proceedings,
    America never would have entered the World War.
    But this conference, like all war discussions, was shrouded in utmost secrecy. When our boys were sent off to war they were told it was a “war to make the world safe for democracy” and a “war to end all wars.”
    Well, eighteen years after, And very little, if anything, has been accomplished to assure us that the World War was really the war to end all wars:
    the world has less of democracy than it had then, besides
    what business is it of ours whether Russia or Germany or England or France or Italy or Austria live under democracies or monarchies? Whether they are Fascists or Communists?
    Our problem is to preserve our own democracy.
    Yes, we have had:
    disarmament conferences, and
    limitations of arms conferences.
    They don’t mean a thing. One has just failed; the results of another have been nullified. We send our professional soldiers and our sailors and our politicians and our diplomats to these conferences. And what happens?
    The professional soldiers and sailors don’t want to disarm. No admiral wants to be without a ship. No general wants to be without a command. Both mean men without jobs. They are not for disarmament. They cannot be for limitations of arms. And at all these conferences, lurking in the background but all-powerful, just the same, are the sinister agents of those who profit by war. They see to it that these conferences do not disarm or seriously limit armaments.
    The chief aim of any power at any of these conferences has not been to achieve disarmament to prevent war but rather to get more armament for itself and less for any potential foe.
    There is only one way to disarm with any semblance of practicability. That is for all nations to get together and scrap every ship, every gun, every rifle, every tank, every war plane. Even this, if it were possible, would not be enough.
    The next war, according to experts, will be fought not with battleships, not by artillery, not with rifles and not with machine guns. It will be fought with deadly chemicals and gases.
    Secretly each nation is studying and perfecting newer and ghastlier means of annihilating its foes wholesale. Yes, ships will continue to be built, for the shipbuilders must make their profits. And guns still will be manufactured and powder and rifles will be made, for the munitions makers must make their huge profits. And the soldiers, of course, must wear uniforms, for the manufacturer must make their war profits too. But victory or defeat will be determined by the skill and ingenuity of our scientists:
    if we put scientists to work making poison gas and more and more fiendish mechanical and explosive instruments of destruction, they will have no time for the constructive job of building greater prosperity for all peoples.
    By putting scientists to this useful job, we can all make more money out of peace than we can out of war — even the munitions makers.
    So…I say, TO HELL WITH WAR!

  25. Johnny Draco says:

    @ The opinion you trust says:
    October 8, 2016 at 9:20 pm
    Good old American General…

    “War Is A Racket By Major General Smedley Butler.”

    I don’t know if you are aware that Butler was a 32 degree freemason/jesuit.
    One does NOT become a “major general” without being in a “secret” society.
    I see him as a controlled opposition.

  26. The opinion you trust says:

    In re to Johnny Draco. October 9, 2016 at 7:38 am

    No I was not aware of the fact that Gen. Butler was a jew. That is outrageous, the jews are everywhere now, I can not even spit without hitting a jew or a nigger.

    However, Johnny Draco, what is written by General Butler worthwhile to read. Whatever we white people can learn from jews must be learned and put to use.

  27. Aitch says:

    There’s a commercial for Lloyds Bank (if I remember rightly) on British TV at the moment. It’s set in a busy city square, and if you look carefully you can see in the background a white man, down on one knee, offering a ring in a little box to his beloved. The ‘beloved’ is an African negro male. At the end of the thing we’re treated to a close-up of the pair throwing their arms round each other in a passionate embrace. The negro is obviously taking the part of the blushing bride. I wonder how our dusky brethren feel about this advert?

  28. Johnny Draco says:

    ***Lane, imprisoned for 190 years, and his fourteen words: We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children

    David Lane

    On Polygamy

    I have had some feedback from a few of our folk who have expressed distress over recent articles on the subject of polygamy. Particularly as one might expect from our few loyal women. But also from established monogamous families who understandably prefer the security of this tradition.

    So please bear with me as I attempt to clear up any misconceptions inadvertently created. And also, again please, recognize that these following concepts are not my egotistical invention. These are the teachings of our indigenous religion based on observance of nature. Be assured that the special romance between one man and one woman, as well as the time tested structure of monogamous marriage are not threatened by the beliefs, practices or history of our Norse, Germanic, European forebears.

    Our wise forefathers, and mothers, did indeed structure their social and religious teachings on nature’s laws. And nature’s laws do indeed declare that superior males should have many mates and many offspring, while inferior males do not deserve the pleasure of either mates or offspring.

    However, our forebears also realized that the needs of a structured society required that certain instincts, as well as the most primitive natural law, had to be tempered with reason and common sense.

    For example, if all men fought to the death over women with very few surviving the carnage, the number remaining could not defend the tribe or race. So laws and rules of conduct were necessary.

    Over eons of time the monogamous family structure proved to be the most beneficial, providing security for women and children, and the basis of an orderly society.

    However, this does defy natural law which declares that the best must breed the most. So what was the answer devised by our ancestors?

    The solution, as always based on observance of natural phenomena, was to divide men into three classifications: Thralls, Karls and Jarls.

    Thralls have always been the slugs of society. Today some examples are government employees, word-twisting preachers, welfare bums and politicians, to name but a few. In a natural world they have no right to the pleasures of a woman, or to reproduce. They should rightfully be enslaved, deported or executed.

    The second classification was the Karls. In times past they were farmers, metalworkers and what we would now call a “Citizens militia.” They are the salt of the earth and the backbone of a civilization. Today they are ranchers, farmers, inventors and craftsmen. They should and must pass on their genetic inheritance with a wife and children. And monogamy is the time-tested best marriage structure for the Karls who make up the largest mass of an Aryan society.

    Although, let me hasten to add, that in a Wotanist society, government does not force structures on the folk. In ancient times if a woman’s sister’s husband was killed, she might well ask her husband to take her sister as a second wife. We might accurately say that what was “good,” was “right.”

    The third classification was the Jarls. Jarls are few and far between. Jarls are superior men who prove their right to rule by demonstrations of tribal (now racial) loyalty, by service to the folk, by courage, perseverance and determination. The survival of the folk depends on the wisdom, courage, altruism and genetic makeup of Jarls. And because they are so rare, their genes must be passed on in abundance. Thus polygamy is nature’s desire for true Jarls.

    Instinctively women know this to be true. Thus we see so-called groupies jumping into the beds of rock stars and sports stars or other celebrities, even though they know they are just one of many in a virtual harem. And even though the celebrities of this age are scum.

    The true Jarl who sacrifices and fights for the life and welfare of the folk deserves a multiplicity of the most beauteous maidens of the folk. Not only so that his genes and their beauty unite in grand offspring, but also because sexual pleasure is the proper reward for a defender of the folk. Again, all our folk instinctively know this as they forgive the sexual peccadilloes of presidents like Kennedy or Clinton. And again, even though our politicians are falsely perceived as Jarls.

    Robert Mathews and George Lincoln Rockwell were Jarls who never received their just rewards in this cycle. Undoubtedly, if our ancestors’ teachings on reincarnation and Valhalla are true, their reward is with the Valkyrie. I like to hope that someday some Valkyrie will be mine, although it appears that age and prison deny that possibility in this cycle.

    Hopefully the above will clear up any misconceptions or misapprehensions about polygamy. The rewards of multiple beautiful maidens must be earned by exceptional service to the folk, before the pleasures are claimed.

    The rewards are necessary in order to inspire our young men to heroic deeds in this desperate age. But this does not endanger the common family structure of our folk overall.

    One last point, however. If this is the time of Ragnarok, then the coming chaos will be such that civilization and its structures will be irrelevant. At that time remember, “What is good is right.” Morality will consist of reproduction and survival and little else.

    David Lane

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *