It is striking how early on in the colonization of the Americas the jews were active. In fact, they were the powerhouse in the slave, sugar and rum trades. They dealt with European authority quite like they did William Howard Taft. They were aloof and unaccountable to all all societies and moral codes; the African and Red Man were nothing but chattel. Juxtapose this with the jewish claim of being relatively new arrivals who identified and had empathy with the plight of the slave and minority. Totally false. The jew was the primary mover in the slave trade.

It is true that most plantation owners were white in America, but not the merchants – the preponderance of them were jews. Where jews did own plantations they typically had a greater proportion of slaves per acre of land held. Then, as now, they are the ones really pulling the nefarious strings of low commerce and conflict, but not the face of it.

It is also interesting that the portugese and spanish had heavy hands in the early slave commerce in the carribean. You would only think it was Anglo-Saxon by what you are told. All the sea-faring powers of the 17th and 18th centuries were traded, but the predominant nation in the trade at any time was the one yielding the greater financial concessions to the international jew influence and money racket. So-called religious concessions were unimportant. These were wrangled whever the jew obtained enough power, which apparently never took that long. The jews really were the slave trade, the nations were their proxies.

All kike swindles are the same, the grand ones are just like the small ones. If we fall for small ones, we fall for larger ones.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=doTln-HDFQo

http://stopwar.org.uk/index.php/video/1078-stop-the-war-protests-against-iran-and-syria-intervention

Avoid World War III — The U.S., Not Israel, Should Attack Iran

By Owen Rust (wonder if this guy is a jew?)

COMMENTARY | According to the Christian Science Monitor, it is likely Israel with launch a preemptive strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities this spring.
While the strike might well be justified, Israel should not be the one to administer the blow. An Israeli-Iranian conflict could easily lead to the decimation of tiny Israel, either through a large-scale Arab retaliation or a massive surge in terrorism encouraged by Iran’s ayatollahs. Additionally, Iran could successfully claim victim status, uniting its citizens in a struggle against its attacker and garnering many supporters who have, so far, been ambiguous or ambivalent about supporting the Islamic Republic.
Iran will gain support at home and abroad and, given the fact many of its suspected nuclear facilities are hardened targets with underground bunkers, maintain much of its current WMD capabilities despite textbook-perfect airstrikes. Israel could hit hard and accomplish little but bringing on a wave of retaliation, perhaps even full-scale war, forcing it to decide whether to use its own suspected nuclear arsenal. The irony would be Israel, in an attempt to prevent itself from being nuked in the future, provokes a war that forces it to become the nuclear aggressor.
If Iran’s nuclear facilities must be destroyed, it is far safer for the world for the U.S. to use its Navy and Air Force to administer the strikes. Iran would have a more difficult time retaliating against an opponent separated by thousands of miles of ocean than it would against a nearby foe like Israel. Similarly, a mass uprising of Iran’s new allies would cause much less harm to the U.S. than it would to Israel.
Iran’s nuclear program is wrecked and World War III, complete with potential nuclear warfare, is prevented. Instead of being able to retaliate against a next-door aggressor, Iran is forced to contend with a larger, more powerful foe on the other side of the globe. It has no justification for trying to annihilate Israel, as it has oft threatened. While crisis might not be averted, it is nevertheless much less likely.
If Iran must be struck to cripple its nuclear ambitions, it should be struck by a foe against that it cannot easily retaliate and thereby begin a wide-ranging war.

http://news.yahoo.com/avoid-world-war-iii-u-not-israel-attack-185500648.html;_ylt=Agi2dmXy0R8aYNvbup.t9hUDW7oF;_ylu=X3oDMTRjN3JzbjRwBGNjb2RlA2N0LmMEbWl0A01vc3RQb3B1bGFyIExpc3RpbmcEcGtnAzZjMTg5YWU1LTE5ZDUtMzA2Ny1hNDdlLWM2MzJhYjA3YmNkZARwb3MDMjMEc2VjA01vc3QgUG9wdWxhcgR2ZXIDYmY3MGI3MTgtNGY2Mi0xMWUxLWJlN2ItMTNjODkxN2I4Zjcz;_ylg=X3oDMTFyNzExZWxyBGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDBHBzdGNhdANwb3B1bGFyBHB0A3NlY3Rpb25zBHRlc3QD;_ylv=3

http://incogman.net/06/2010/summertime-advice-dont-go-in-the-water/

As ever , they didnt let me down :

A book discussion programme , for the first time in its history , they are reviewing a graphic novel…….a shaggy dog story about cats and rats ……

” James Naughtie and readers talk to the American writer and artist Art Spiegelman about his graphic novel Maus.

First published in short frames in his experimental comic RAW in the 1970s, Maus the book has become a publishing phenomenon, selling over two million copies world wide.

It tells the story of his parents, Vladek and Anja Spiegelman, from their first meeting in pre-war Poland to their survival of the death camps at Auschwitz and Dachau and their move to New York after the war.

Part of the success of the book is Art’s portrayal of the characters as animals. The Jews are mice, the Germans cats, the Poles pigs and the Americans dogs. The mouse metaphor, he says, came naturally to him as a comic book writer. He wanted to keep the scale of the book small, and with Maus, all he wanted to do was tell a story, he never wanted to change the world, he’s too pessimistic for that.

The story follows the birth of his elder brother Richieu, who was poisoned by an aunt rather than face capture; how his parents were hidden by generous Poles, and then betrayed to the SS as they paid to be smuggled over the border to safer Hungary.

As well as the force of this story, Art Spiegelman talks about the powerful subplot which shows the difficult relationship between father and son, and what it could be like for the child of Holocaust survivors. In Maus, Art refuses to sentimentalise or sanctify his father the survivor; and in the same way his self-portrait is unflinching in its honesty. ”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01bkym0

Whites have no rights regarding property and our free speech right is hanging on by a thread.

Ohio woman loses appeal on “White Only” pool sign

Thu Jan 12, 2012

(Reuters) – A Cincinnati landlord found to have violated state anti-discrimination laws after she hung a “white only” sign outside her swimming pool lost an appeal with the Ohio Civil Rights Commission on Thursday.

The ruling clears the way for the case to be referred to the state attorney general’s office for possible state civil charges and the possibility of being forced to pay compensatory and punitive damages.

The commission ruled the sign, which read “Public Swimming Pool, White Only,” violated state housing discrimination laws, and dismissed landlord Jamie Hein’s claim that it was simply a decorative antique.

The commission’s ruling followed a complaint by Michael Gunn, a former tenant who brought his 10-year-old biracial daughter to a Memorial Day weekend pool party on Hein’s property attended by about 20 other guests.

Gunn said Hein later questioned him about the “chemicals” his daughter used in her hair and blamed the girl, the only non-Caucasian at the party, for making the pool water “cloudy.”

Gunn told the commission that about a week later he saw the “white only” sign on the gate leading to the pool. He said he and his fiancé decided to move away immediately so “as not to expose my daughter to the sign and humiliation.”

As part of the commission’s investigation, Gunn produced copies of texts he said Hein had sent to his fiancé shortly after the family moved out, blaming “grease” in his daughter’s hair for the cloudy condition of the pool.

After an investigation into the allegations and “informal efforts to resolve the case,” the Civil Rights Commission ruled in September that Hein had violated the law.
Hein requested an appeal after the initial findings but neither she nor her attorney attended the hearing on Thursday.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/12/us-ohio-discrimination-pool-idUSTRE80B24120120112