The Choreographed US “Outrage” at Israel

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at the AIPAC conference in Washington, DC, 22 March 2010. (Nicholas Kamm/AFP)

Stephen Maher, The Electronic Intifada

The speeches at AIPAC, the pro-Israel lobby group, on Monday by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Netanyahu’s subsequent meeting with US President Barack Obama are widely seen as drawing to a close what Israeli ambassador to the US Michael Oren called the “most severe crisis in US-Israel relations” in decades. This rapprochement comes on the heels of a series of seemingly angry statements top members of the Obama Administration released, after Israel announced construction of 1,600 new illegal housing units in occupied East Jerusalem while US Vice President Joe Biden was in the country.

The lousy Jews have long had the US government under their fat and greasy thumb — if any politician, or anyone for that matter, dares say anything about it, then the Jew-controlled press will just ignore them, or turn them into a pariah in the eyes of a gullible and unaware public, if need be. [INCOG]

In fact, the basis for the Obama Administration’s criticisms of the settlement announcement — as well as the significance of the crisis itself — has been widely misconstrued by both supporters and critics of Israel. AIPAC and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) were “shocked and stunned” that Biden and Clinton called the Israeli announcement “insulting.” AIPAC urged the administration to “take immediate steps to defuse the tension with the Jewish state” and “move away from public demands and unilateral deadlines directed at Israel.” Meanwhile, the ADL mused, “One can only wonder how far the US is prepared go in distancing itself from Israel.”

Voices more critical of Israel, such as Richard Dreyfuss of The Nation, suggested that “this is not just the reaction to an insulting announcement during the visit of Vice President Biden,” but rather “the Obama Administration is beginning to realize that Israeli intransigence … is a major obstacle to US policy in the region.” Dreyfuss predicted that this “might turn into the most significant confrontation between the United States and Israel” since the 1956 Suez War.

Contrary to both of these positions, the Obama Administration merely reacted to a diplomatic affront it was dealt by the Israeli government. Israel’s announcement came on the same day that Biden had arrived in the country to proudly confirm the US’ “absolute, total and unvarnished” commitment to its ally, and commence indirect talks with the Palestinians. Following the announcement, protests and violent clashes broke out in Jerusalem and elsewhere throughout the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Responding to this pressure, the Arab League threatened to cancel its endorsement of the indirect negotiations, with Secretary Amr Moussa even announcing that the Ramallah-based Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas had decided not to participate in the talks. As the endorsement was the only political cover Abbas had to re-enter negotiations, the US administration took careful notice of these events as pressure on Abbas to abandon talks from within the territories mounted. With the Arab world outraged and Biden humiliated due to the degree of US complicity that the timing of the announcement revealed, the Obama Administration was forced to react.

Clinton said the timing of the announcement was “insulting,” while top aide David Axelrod [right] called it an “affront” that “seemed calculated” to undermine the peace talks. The Obama Administration hopes that this PR display will allow the US to fortify its farcical claim to be an “honest broker” in the peace process, provide Abbas the political cover to re-enter negotiations, and send a message to the Israeli government that American leaders are to be treated with respect. As CNN reported, Netanyahu has now set up a team to investigate why the settlement construction announcement was made during Biden’s visit.

Netanyahu may well have been telling the truth when he claimed to be “surprised” by the public criticisms by the US government. The day before, one day after US envoy George Mitchell arrived to broker newly-announced “proximity talks,” the State Department explicitly approved Israel’s construction of 112 new apartments in an illegal settlement outside Bethlehem. The assent came despite Netanyahu’s declaration of a “moratorium” on settlement building, which he has insisted cannot include such illegal construction in Israeli-occupied East Jerusalem, a position the US has accepted.

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has also chastised Israel for its “provocative actions,” including record-high rates of stripping Palestinians from Jerusalem their residency rights and infringements on Palestinian religious sites that are clearly designed to incite a Palestinian response or otherwise make it impossible for Abbas to return to the negotiating table. Yet even when the administration was at its most critical of Israel, following Obama’s speech in Cairo last year, Israel was reassured that the actions taken by the US would be “largely symbolic.” Indeed, Obama unconditionally re-authorized the loan guarantees program and massive US aid — conservatively estimated at $7 million per day — has continued without threat of reduction.

Obviously, the Obama Administration is hardly concerned about Israeli violations of international law, previous agreements it has signed, or the human rights of the Palestinians. The implication throughout is that had the announcement come a week before Biden visited (or even a day before, as the Bethlehem announcement did) there would have been no problem. Indeed, just one week later, after the Israeli government announced construction on an additional 426 East Jerusalem settlement homes, Clinton “bolstered her support for the Jewish state,” according to The Washington Post. The Israeli army then opened fire on peaceful protestors in Gaza twice in two days, and carried out air strikes on targets in Gaza, while Clinton issued another statement saying that the steps offered by the Israeli government to resolve the dispute were “useful and productive.”

The escalating repression continued Sunday, when the Israeli army shot and killed four Palestinian youths in 24 hours in the West Bank, two aged 18 and two 16. Simultaneously, Netanyahu issued a statement proclaiming that Israel would never cease building illegally in East Jerusalem as Ban Ki-moon arrived in Israel. Clearly, recent condemnations of these projects as “illegal” by Ban and the European Union did not stop Obama from welcoming Netanyahu to Washington on Monday with a private meeting, nor Clinton from proudly sharing the stage with him at the AIPAC conference to reaffirm the US commitment to support Israel’s rejection of the international consensus for resolving the conflict. Though she did say the settlements “undermine mutual trust,” she did not acknowledge their illegality and mostly stressed the threat that US support for them poses to its “credibility” as an “honest broker,” thus urging Israel to refrain from such flagrantly provocative behavior while reinforcing that the US-Israel relationship is “rock solid.”

The US hopes that this pretended outrage will lend its role as “honest broker” enough credibility to keep the “peace process” moving, itself merely a PR facade that shields Israeli crimes from public scrutiny. If it does not, the US will undoubtedly pay little mind to the harsh words spoken this week and do as it has done before: blame the Palestinians for its failure and support Israeli repression.

Stephen Maher is an MA candidate at American University School of International Service who has lived in the West Bank, and is currently writing his masters’ thesis, “The New Nakba: Oslo and the End of Palestine,” on the Israel-Palestine conflict. His work has been appeared in Extra!, ZNet and other publications. His blog is


Judas Goat Lindsey Graham Kisses Jew Ass!


Lindsay Graham (R-SC) pandering to AIPAC, urging a war with the Persians, making it obvious the Washington Consensus means to take the nation to war and giving the lie to the absurd notion that Obama represents a change from America’s Israel-centric foreign policy. If we do not attack Iran, Graham says, “tolerance” will suffer a huge a blow and another holocaust will follow. Madness.


Liberal Republican Lindsey Graham spoke to AIPAC a few days ago. AIPAC is the umbrella organization for the massive Israeli foreign lobby. Once again we see Graham pledging his loyalty to another minority interest lobby in Washington. Graham promises to seek war against Iran on behalf of Israel.

Israel has the largest foreign lobby in Washington. AIPAC acts as an umbrella for a network of over 100 smaller pro-Israel PACs. Together they dish out millions a year in campaign funding. AIPAC was a leading advocate of the Gulf War and the Operation Iraqi Freedom. Several members of the Obama administration, including Hillary and Obama himself, are members of AIPAC.

Where in the constitution does it say that America should go to war on behalf of the largest bidder?



Lights, Camera, Distraction!


Print Friendly, PDF & Email


100% White boy born and bred in the USA. Dedicated to awakening Whites to all the crap being done to our decent, fair-minded race and exposing the devious brainwashing rats behind it all. Wake the ef up, White people!
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

274 Responses to The Choreographed US “Outrage” at Israel

  1. American says:

    Here we see Rahm “tinkerbell” Emmanuel wants to disarm Americans, while we’ve all seen videos of Israelis running around in sandals and yarmulkeys, terrorizing defenseless Palestinians. And let’s not forget we also fund their military with cash, and machinery sold as “surplus” by dual citizenship JEWS infesting our government:

  2. gtrman says:

    Thanks Akira. I always think that both Millibands ( and some others ) sound like Blair disciples, similar “coached” vocal mannerisms, “man of the people” glottal stops and the odd dropped “h”.

    In ten or twenty years, with the right moustache, Milliband will be the “Big Brother ” face.

  3. ????? says:

    At the 35th second the host turned to Milicent and asked, “Do you want to answer””. Milicent obviously must have shaken his head or said “no”, because the host then turns back to ask the Paki another question.

    + + +

    Correction. Above, I meant that after Naming the Jew, I went from being called “an Islamophobe and a Homophobe and a Nazi!” to being called “an Islamophobe and a Homophobe and an Antishemite and a Nazi!” In fact, I’m a very kind and gentle soul, with love for every one.

    + + +

    Another classic Jew-Gob-Stopping Moment:

    “Michael Sheuer wipes dumb grin off Bill Maher’s hatchet-face”

  4. Flanders says:

    Is the “European” “little Israel” involved in the Moscow massacre? Nikolai Patrushev of the Russian FSB intends to check whether they are.

    “We have had information that individual members of Georgian special forces support contacts with terrorist organisations in the Russian North Caucasus. We must check this also in relation to the acts of terror in Moscow.”

  5. Flanders says:

    Cops had her arms pinned behind her after she showed her driver’s license, but the negro woman dropping off her kids refused to sign a ticket, which she equated with an admission of guilt.

    “A federal appeals court says three Seattle police officers did not employ excessive force when they repeatedly tasered a visibly pregnant woman for refusing to sign a speeding ticket.”

    Read More

  6. American says:

    Since somebody brought up Adam Austin, here’s a great video for those who serve in the American military. It is the terrorist JEWS that call our returning veterans “potential terrorists”. The REAL citizens here would never do that!:

  7. Flanders says:

    Holy politics, Batman! Nicolas Sarkozy and Barack Obama leap from a White House press conference yesterday

    Read more:

  8. anarchore says:

    Funny that I don’t see the usual suspects saying that J-wish descended Sabrosky is a Talmudic liar… interesting!

    Meet Dr. Alan Sabrosky, a brave man, a USMC Vietnam vet, an American of Jewish ancestry and someone devoted to the security of the United States at any cost. Ask any Jew what it takes to stand up against the most powerful and ruthless group in the world, the Israeli lobby inside the United States.

    • INCOG MAN says:

      Well, sure, some Jews will tell the truth. How many is the question. 10 out of a thousand? Why don’t you argue with God on how many decent people live in Sodom and Gomorrah before he brings down the hammer?

      And that hammer is coming down, JACK!

  9. ????? says:

    Wrong again, Manticore.

    I said that as much as I believe he’s sincere, and like what he says, I have to wonder why he associates with the most anger-mismanaged of the 3 monkeys and his stage-Oirish sidekick.

    Of course, I’m an unusual suspect.

  10. American says:

    Sabrosky isn’t lying, so why would Gentiles accuse him of it?

    He’s nothing like you, ‘analsore’.

  11. ????? says:

    Sabrosky’s line is that the Jew-State drags all Jews down, with its immorality and its genocidal machinations. He says that Jews have many fine things to be proud of, many great achievements. But anyway, he doesn’t much care, because as far as he’s concerned, being Jewish just means enjoying the dubious pleasures of the Ashkenazi cuisine.

    Of course, he’s deluded about these “Jewish achievements”, but nobody’s perfect. At least he has the decency to say that his pledge to defend the constitution overrides any Jewey affiliations he may have been born into. Not bad, for a Jewbo. He’s a credit to his race.

  12. GDL/White Master says:

    Jews are good at one thing…RUNNING THEIR MOUTHS!


  13. Lynda says:

    At present, I think the Western nations are still in a window of opportunity for a ‘hands up – who wants to be an American, an Australian, a Canadian’.
    The time is now for people to come forward and make common cause.

    The Mexican Americans Biker refers to – they have made sacrifices to become naturalised, who obey American laws that are legitimate (constitutional) – they have every every reason to make common cause with the penalized White majority. Ditto for the Jews who want out from under Jewry and the local Beit Din. They don’t want to be a state within a state – they want to be Americans.

    Jewry, of course, will try to bust up these alliances.

    Whites are still the largest demographic in the U.S. and can still reach out to anyone who wants to defend traditional American ideals.

  14. Anonymous says:

    This piece of cabalistic filth on the first link below has the power to ban anyone it likes who it deems as a ‘nazi’. It does so much for it’s holohoax cause but true to form being the parasite it is, CHOOSES to live in England as a “lord” (sic)..

    America may be bad but England certainly went to the dogs a very long time ago…

  15. Bella says:

    Bill Maher is a fool.

  16. Bella says:

    Why can Billary not just retire gracefully? Talk about a phucked out old broad!!! I mean, how desperate for attention can anyone get?

  17. Lewis says:

    What the fuck do you fat ass americans know about Israel?

  18. Bella says:

    Dear Lewis, we all know it is a U.S. funded welfare state which is murdering a lot of Palestinian women & children. Tax dollars down the rathole.

  19. Jen says:

    Jewis said,

    “What the fuck do you fat ass americans know about Israel?”

    We know that the host is getting sick of the parasite.

    Can the parasite survive on its own?

  20. ????? says:

    Jewis: “What the fuck do you fat ass americans know about Israel?”

    You’re right, Jewis.

    Most non-Yid Americans (even the skinny ones) really know nothing about the Zionist Entity in Palestine.

    Therefore, they shouldn’t allow their tax dollars to go to something they don’t understand, right?

  21. lew says:

    “Therefore, they shouldn’t allow their tax dollars to go to something they don’t understand, right?”

    Istead it should go to Akira, who is begging those whites for a kick in the ass to fly him back to his rat hole in Japan, so he can commit ???

  22. Biker says:

    ohhhh LEWIS!!!! what about the Lavon affair, or the USS Liberty asshole?! not to mention Irgun, or all the other terrorist operations/events Israhell is built on. why dont you spin a chicken, kill it, and drink the blood you satanic fuckin JEW piece o shit.

  23. Biker says:

    waiting on a response ya asshole JEW. explain the U.S.S. Liberty, or go FUCK yourself somewhere you chicken spinning KIKE.

  24. ????? says:

    Wrong Jew, I’m not begging. I said that if any person (any person — Yid, Nip, Paleskin, Negro, Paki, Nip, Pom, Paddy, Towelhead, who-or-whatsoever) contributes to the Send Akira Back To Japan/Asia Fund, then I will campaign there o have any Jews, Muslims, Yanks or Brits barred from entry, and for Slavemasons to be suppressed with extreme prejudice.

    And yes, it would be better for Americans to give me at least 3 billion dollars a year, than to give it to the Zionist Entity in Palestine.

    In fact, I might just start a website to promote that very idea.

  25. Geronimo says:

    @Lynda – “At present, I think the Western nations are still in a window of opportunity for a ‘hands up – who wants to be an American, an Australian, a Canadian’.
    The time is now for people to come forward and make common cause.

    The Mexican Americans Biker refers to – they have made sacrifices to become naturalised, who obey American laws that are legitimate (constitutional) – they have every every reason to make common cause with the penalized White majority. Ditto for the Jews who want out from under Jewry and the local Beit Din. They don’t want to be a state within a state – they want to be Americans.

    Jewry, of course, will try to bust up these alliances.

    Whites are still the largest demographic in the U.S. and can still reach out to anyone who wants to defend traditional American ideals.”

    I too share this sentiment. With full recognition of history’s story concerning the conquest of the nation’s land and my descendant’s brave abet ultimately losing fight to keep it I am first and foremost an American and I’ll defend the well of freedom from whatever or whomever wishes to poison it. For proof I have firmly and proudly raised my hand in solemn oath to support and defend The Constitution of the United States against ALL enemies, both foreign AND domestic.

    There are many in positions of power who’ve taken such oaths lightly, or disregard them altogether, because of the fact their thirst for personal gain or ingrained loyalty towards foreign nations and tribes surmounts pledged loyalty to the nation. I spit upon them.

    As a person of mixed European/Apache Indian ancestory I am a product of American expansionism, of Manifest Destiny. I cannot change who I am and do not apologies for it either. All I can state is this; above the narcissitic trappings of wealth and power I value truth, honesty, integrity, and most of all, freedom. I seek the company of the like-minded. I offer my moral and physical support to the fight against evil. There is iron in Incogman’s words of truth. If this is not enough then so be it, and goodbye.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.